09:26:00	 From Chandan  to  Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) (Privately) : okk
09:26:07	 From Chandan  to  Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) (Privately) : thik hain 
09:26:13	 From Chandan  to  Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) (Privately) : kuch nehi hain
09:26:22	 From Chandan  to  Jimmy Forsyth (AT&T) (Privately) : kal bolega woh helm chats k bare main 
09:29:30	 From Keong Lim k00759777 : which part of https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/BBS+Modeling are you referring to?
09:31:57	 From Keong Lim k00759777 : https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/AAI-BBS+Proposals+for+Dublin+Release
09:43:58	 From Keong Lim k00759777 : https://groups.io/g/onap-bbs/message/135
09:43:59	 From Keong Lim k00759777 : Hi Chandra,

we just discussed in the BBS team call about the different options we have to store the information on the attachmentPoint of a given PNF. 
The proposed solution using l-interface may create confusion as, in BBS case, the logical-interface of the ONT would be referring to an interface that belongs to a different network element, the OLT.
We still prefer to use a new string field in the PNF resource model named ‘attachmentPoint’.

Would it be ok to add this field in Dublin from the modeling team perspective?

Thank you,
David
09:48:51	 From Keong Lim k00759777 : https://jira.onap.org/browse/AAI-2151
09:57:05	 From Keong Lim k00759777 : number 5 on https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/AAI+Schema+Producer-Consumer+Pairings