Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance11

This file shows basic performance benchmarks performed for MUSIC on a 10 node cluster.

  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability11As shown in this file, our experimental runs were all over 1 hour.
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency

12

2

Within each container we have scripts that will detect failure of MUSIC and restart it. However, if the entire container fails, we will need OOM to bring it up.

  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security

2

2

  • SSL Communication’s between Cassandra Cluster Nodes.
  • REST over HTTPS with AAF for Authentication.
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability

01

1

Among the MUSIC components [tomcat, zookeeper, cassandra], new MUSIC nodes with the tomcat and cassandra can be added seamlessly to scale the cluster (MUSIC itself is state-less). However, our current version of Zookeeper (3.4.0) does not support dynamic reconfiguration. Will move to Zookeeper 3.5.0 that supports dynamic reconfiguration and test MUSIC sclability. We will also need to work with OOM support to spin new containers on demand for the scalability needsZookeeper nodes ideally should not be scaled since there are major performance implications. However, this can be done with reconfiguration.


  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability

1

1

Using EELF with logback as the logging provider.

  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability

1

1

Use SWAGGER for the REST API and Installation Docs. Will need to enhance and update the documentation.

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation

...