Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

The Policy POLICY is a subsystem of ONAP that maintains, distributes, and operates on the set of rules that underlie ONAP’s control, orchestration, and management functions. 

POLICY Policy provides a logically centralized environment for the creation and management of easily-updatable policies, including conditional rules. It enables users to   This provides the capability to create and validate policies and /rules, identify and overlaps, resolve overlaps and conflicts, and derive additional policies where as needed.  Policies are used to control, influence, and help ensure compliance with goals.  Policies can support infrastructure, products and services, operation automation, and security. Users, who can be a variety of stakeholders such as   Users, including network and service designers, operations engineers, and security experts, can easily create, change, and manage policy rules from the  Policy the POLICY Manager in the ONAP Portal..

The figure below represents the target POLICY Architecture.


Image Added


The figure below represents the current POLICY Architecture.

Image Added

A policy is defined Policies are used to control, to influence, and to help ensure compliance with goals. A policy can be defined at a high level to create a condition, requirement, constraint, decision, or a need that must be provided, evaluated, maintained, and/or enforced. A policy can also be defined at a lower or functional level, such as a machine-readable rule or software condition/assertion which enables actions to be taken based on a trigger or request, specific to particular selected conditions in effect at that time.  Some examples of types of policies are

  • VNF placement — rules governing where VNFs should be placed, including affinity rules
  • Data and feed management — what data to collect and when, retention periods, and when to send alarms about issues
  • Access control — who (or what) can have access to which data
  • Trigger conditions and actions — what conditions are actionable, and what to do under those conditions
  • Interactions — how interactions between change management and fault/performance management are handled (for example, should closed loops be disabled during maintenance?)

ONAP supports XACML policies and Drools rules.  Several configuration and operational policies are pre-loaded.

...

  The policy is validated and corrected for any conflicts,

...

and then placed in

...

the appropriate repository, and

...

made available

...

for use by other subsystems and components

...

Figure 1 depicts the Policy architecture.

Image Removed

...

.  Alternately, some policies are directly distributed to policy decision engines such as Drools or XACML.   In this manner, the constraints, decisions and actions to be taken are distributed.

System Architecture

ONAP Policy POLICY is composed of several subcomponents: the Policy Administration Point (PAP), which offers interfaces for policy creation, and two types of Policy Decision Point (PDP), each based on a specific rules technology.  PDP-X is based on XACML technology  and and PDP-D is based on Drools technology.  PDP-X is stateless and can be implemented using deployed as a resource pool of PDP-X servers.  The number of servers can be grown to increase both capacity (horizontal scalability) and to increase availability.  The PDP-D is stateful, as it utilizes Drools in its native, stateful way and transactions persist so long as the PDP-D is active.  Persistent Drools sessions, state management, local and geo-redundancy have been deactivated for the initial release of ONAP Policy POLICY and will can be turned on in a future release.  Additional instances of XACML/Drools engines and assigned roles/purposes may also be added in the future to provide a flexible, expandable policy capability.

As illustrated in the Figure 2below, the Policy POLICY components are supported by a number of interfaces and subsystems.  The ONAP Portal provides a human interface for the creation, management and deployment of policies.  It is a web-based system that utilizes internal POLICY APIs in provided by the PAP.

Image Removed

Figure 2. Policy subsystem system architecture 

Image Added


The PAP provides interfaces and for the management of policy definitionspolicies.  It utilizes the XACML database to store policy definitionspolicies, which are then distributed to the PDPs.

The XACML and Drools databases are hosted in a MariaDB cluster.  The XACML database is used to persist policies and policy definitions dictionaries and provide a point for PDPs to retrieve policy definitionspolicies.  The XACML database also has tables used for node state management, detection of node failure and failover. As indicated above, the state management tables will only include entries for the PAP and PDP-X as the testing is not yet complete for the PDP-D.

...

When the PDP-D is notified a new policy has been deployed, it downloads it from the Maven repository and assigns it to an internal controller.  This controller provides the external Closed Loop interfaces to the DMaaP message bus over which events and messages are exchanged with external systems.  As events or messages arrive at the PDP-D, they are assigned to the appropriate controller and a Drools session is either created or retrieved from memory.  The events, messages or facts are passed to the Drools session and the corresponding rule engine is fired,  resulting resulting in a change of internal session state and possibly actions taken in response to the rule processing. Response messages and requests are passed by the controller back over the DMaaP message bus to the appropriate system.  The Drools session can also have timers and autonomous events. In a future release the PDP-D will can enable the node state management and session persistence in the Drools DB. 

Policy Creation

The Policy Creation component of the Policy subsystem enables creation of new policies and modification of existing polices, both online and offline.during the design phase and during runtime.  Policy Creation is targeted to be integrated to a unified Service Design and Creation (SDC) environment.

A policy can be defined at a high level to create a condition, requirement, constraint, decision or a need that must be provided, evaluated, maintained, and/or enforced. A policy can also be defined at a lower or functional level, such as a machine-readable rule or software condition/assertion which enables actions to be taken based on a trigger or request, specific to particular selected conditions in effect at that time. 

Some examples of types of policies are:

  • VNF placement — rules governing where VNFs should be placed, including affinity rules
  • Data and feed management — what data to collect and when, retention periods, and when to send alarms about issues
  • Access control — who (or what) can have access to which data
  • Trigger conditions and actions — what conditions are actionable, and what to do under those conditions
  • Interactions — how interactions between change management and fault/performance management are handled (for example, should closed loops be disabled during maintenance?)


Policy Distribution

After a policy has been initially created or an existing policy has been modified, the Policy Distribution Framework sends the policy from the repository to its points of use, known as which include Policy Distribution Points, before it is actually neededDecision Points (PDPs) and Policy enforcement points (DCAE, Controllers, etc), before the policy is actually needed.

The decisions and actions taken by the policy are distributed.  Policies are distributed either in conjunction with installation packages (for example, related to service instantiation) or independently, if unrelated to a particular service.  Some policies can be configured (e.g., configuring policy parameters within microservices), while other polices are delivered to policy engines such as XAMCL and Drools.  With this methodology, policies will already be available when needed by a component, minimizing real-time requests to a central policy engine or PDP (Policy Decision Point). This improves scalability and reduces latency.

Separate notifications or events communicate the link or URL for a policy to the components that need it.  Then, when a component needs the policy, it uses the link to fetch it. Components in some cases might also publish events indicating that they need new policies, eliciting a response with updated links or URLs. Also, in some cases, policies can indicate to components that they should subscribe to one or more policies, so that they receive automatic updates to those policies as they become available.

Policy Decision and Enforcement

Run-time policy enforcement is performed by ONAP subsystems that are called from the policy. For policy-enabled or can respond to commands from a policy-enabled element such as a PDP.  For example, policy rules for data collection are enforced by the data collection functionality of DCAE. Analytic policy rules, identification of anomalous or abnormal conditions, and publication of events signaling detection of such conditions are enforced by DCAE analytic applications. Policy  Policy rules for associated remedial actions, or for further diagnostics, are enforced by the correct component in a control loop such as the MSO, a Controller, or DCAE.  Policy engines such as XACML and Drools also enforce policies and can trigger other components as a result (for example, causing a controller to take specific actions specified by the policy).  Additionally, some policies (“Guard Policies”) may enforce checks against decided actions.


Policy Unification and Organization

Because the policy POLICY framework is expandable and multipurpose, it might is likely to contain many types of policies , which users might want to organize which require organization according to some useful dimensions.  Users can define attributes that specify the scope of policies, and these attributes can be extended to the policy-enabled functions and components. Useful policy organizing dimensions might include:

  • Policy type or category (taxonomical)
  • Policy life cycle
  • Policy ownership or administrative domain
  • Geographic area or location, 
  • Technology type  
  • Policy language and version 
  • Security level or other security-related values, specifiers, or limiters

Attributes can be specified for each dimension. In addition to being defined for individual policies themselves, these attributes can be used to define the scope of these additional additional policy-related functions:

  • Policy events or requests/triggers 
  • Policy decision, enforcement, or other functions 
  • Virtual functions of any type type

Policy - writers can define attributes so that policy events or requests self-indicate their scope. The scope is then examined by a suitable function and subsequently acted upon accordingly. Policy decisions and enforcement functions can self-indicate their scope of decision-making, enforcement, or other capabilities. Virtual functions can be automatically attached to the appropriate Policy POLICY Framework and distribution mechanisms.