...
| Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidence - Comment | How to? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Management | Are all provisional APIs interface (stub) been defined (at beta-quality level)? | Yes | ||
| Is there a final list of externally consumable APIs available? | ||||
For all completed Sprints, have Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | SO Jira Link | Difference between a Product and Sprint Backlog | |
Are all tasks associated with the completed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | Yes | SO Backlog | ||
| If applicable to your project, has your team been able to clear the project' blockers? If not provide status on the plan to close the blocker(s). | Yes | No Blockers for M2 | Link to blockers. | |
| Release Management | Have all source code files been updated with License Apache 2 header? | Yes | Yes | Specific rules and instruction are available in ONAP wiki. |
| Has the year format in copyright header of all source code files been updated? (Rules for new files created in 2017 and existing files modified in 2017 are different) | Yes | Discussed within team and agreed upon. "Ecomp" in the code is to be removed (if required). | Guidance on year format | |
| In case source code can't be edited, has a "License.txt" file been placed at the root directory for which the license is applicable? | Yes | Guidance for source code file that can't be edited | ||
| Has the project FOSS Table been updated with latest third party code? | Yes | Provide link to evidence | Your project FOSS table is located under Project FOSS master page | |
| Do you have a plan to address any issue raised by Fossology? | Yes | |||
Have all API projects dependencies been captured? | Yes | Provide link to the "API Incoming Dependency" section within your project M1 Release Planning deliverable. | The source of information for the API dependency is the "API Incoming Dependency" of the M1 Release Planning deliverable. Please update the source accordingly, and let The Release Manager aware of the changes. | |
| Development | For new projects approved for this release, have all defined repositories source code been placed into Gerrit? | Yes | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | |
| Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | Yes | Goal: 30-50% for Incubation project | ||
| Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | No | Need to re-check again | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | |
| Could you ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, company name, etc. have been removed? All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols. | Yes | Discussed within team and agreed upon | ||
| Is there any pending commit request older than 36 business hours in Gerrit? | No | |||
| Have all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (Merge-Jobs)? | Yes | Provide link as evidence to Jenkins project tab | ||
| Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus? | Yes (Under Ecomp) No | Provide link to evidence in Nexus project folder | To be ported to the ONAP lib | |
| Integration and Testing | Have functional test cases been documented in wiki? | Yes | SO Functional test cases | |
| Have you implemented in Jenkins at least 1 functional test case for each of the project repository? | NoYes | Found issue and checking with Integration tem. Captured this as a story in JIRA | As an example (provided by Integration Team) | |
| Has the project code successfully passed the Build process? | Yes | Goal is to ensure your project latest commits have not broken the build. | ||
| Documentation | Has the team identified and outlined the set of documentations to be delivered in this Release? | Yes | SO Doumentation Epic |