...
ONAP Modeling session in September 2017 during F2F deverloper event
20171214 Minutes of ONAP Modeling workshop
1 Service IM: back to service(customer facing service)/service component(resource facing service, e.g. network service)/resource/resource component layering class diagram, not using composite/decorative pattern for Beijing, translate into papyrus format based on agreed clean version.
2 Resource IM: For design time model, agreed to work on a subset of IFA011 for Beijing (i.e. remove internalCP as show in the discussion page), agreed to add hierarchy for CP inheritance, agreed to work on the latest version of IFA011 (v2.3.1). For run time model, agreed to refactor some of the attributes (e.g., ip addresses).
3 Design time DM: Agreed on Service and Resource hierarchy, while both service and resource can leverage substitution mapping mechanism to realize self-recursion aggregation or composition relations if needed by the IM.
4 Runtime DM A&AI will update NFV related API? in order to align with Information model, and notify the related project accordingly
5 Agreed to work on a concrete example to show how ONAP IM maps to ONAP DM.
6 R2 will be based on TOSCA simple profile 1.1 other than 1.2, but may need to consider some special feature of 1.2 if needed by the use case
7 Each DF should be described in a single TOSCA Service template (VNFD) and considered as a single VNF, in Beijing release, one VNF package will only contain one VNFD
8 R2+ Modeling spec naming convention will use the low camel for attribute names, will consider to add naming convention check during M1/M4
9 WiKi will be used for Modeling spec intermediate version, Readthedoc will be used for published version
10 Michela volunteer to start to work on the common terminologies for ONAP modeling
11 Modeling spec will be migrate to Papyrus asap, needs to decide version number and setup the timeline to proceed it
12 Use Jira/backlog to track the work asap
20171213 Deployment Flavor Meeting Minutes
...