Nominations come from the community unless otherwise noted in the description. The TSC will then votes on the nominees.
Nominations open through:
TSC Voting Closes:
Presented to the individual whose exemplary behavior, spirit and contributions during this release cycle have played a pivotal role in:
Nominated Candidate | Reason for Nomination |
---|---|
OOM team: Andreas and Fiachra | All the efforts related to implementation of service mesh in ONAP. |
Presented to the individual who has provided the highest level of personal assistance in the form of leadership, education, mentorship, testing/development/debugging, document creation/review or similar direct and indirect support activities for the ONAP community across multiple projects, committees or initiatives.
Nominated Candidate | Reason for Nomination |
---|---|
N.K. Shankaranarayanan | All efforts related to ONAP and OSC communication. |
Magnus Buhrgard | All efforts related to streamlining ONAP. |
Presented to the project which has made the most significant progress improving their own project's stability, security, scalability and performance deliverables, serving as a model for other ONAP projects to follow in this area.
Nominated Candidate | Reason for Nomination |
---|---|
Lee Anjella Macabuhay | All efforts for providing 5Y security questionaire and improving CPS project security awareness. |
NOTE: Opt-in contest open to any ONAP community members. Entries Must Be Submitted Here. The TSC will then select up to 3 of their favorite demos from those submitted to receive an award
NOTE: Hand chosen by TSC members- Presented based on the TSC's evaluation and assessment of the impact an individual's contributions has had upon ONAP testing and test automation efforts.
NOTE: Derived exclusively from LFX Insights Data -Automatically awarded to the Top-3 contributors of merged code as measured between M1 and the Sign-off dates.
Dan Timoney |
Liam Fallon |
Thomas Kulik |