Overview
| Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
|---|---|
| Target Release Name | Beijing |
| Project Lifecycle State | incubation |
| Participating Company | Huawei, AT&T |
As a user/operator, i should be able to perform the ONAP operations from OCC/Linux console, required for Beijing release.
Minimum Viable Product
Provide OCC to to operate ONAP environment from Portal & OOM.
Provides required commands for SO, SDC, MSB and AAI for performing Beijing use case (change mgmt, scaling) from command line.
Functionalities
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
As CLI is critical in devops environment, in future, CLI will be extended to use in VNF boot scripts and Integration projects to make the ONAP integration point smoother and easier.
| Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
|---|---|
| CLI Nexus zip archive | ZIP archive used to install the CLI manually |
| CLI docker container | Docker container to run the ONAP command and will integrate into demo environment |
| Documentation | Developer guide User guide Release notes Architecture open-cli-schema-1.0 specification |
NIL
Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.
| Area | Actual Level | Targeted Level for current Release | How, Evidences | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 0 | 1 |
NOTE: Performance test is not performed in amsterdam though it performent, which is best observed during the usage. so current level is marked 0. In this release, we will add bennchmarking test cases to show the level 1 | |
| Stability | 0 | 1 |
NOTE: Test cases are not added to test the sabiltity and bechmark it. so current level is marked 0. Otherwise, its very stable at level 1 or more. will address the test cases in this release. | |
| Resiliency | 1 | 2 |
| |
| Security | 0 | 1 |
| |
| Scalability | 1 | 1 |
| |
| Manageability | 1 | 1 |
| |
| Usability | 1 | 2 |
|
•Open Command – Models the most of the requirements of CLI and it’s the CLI schema engine, understands the OPEN-CLI 1.0 schema and make it as Command
–Command Plug-in : Provides extensibility support to implement any commands which are depends on java api
–HTTP Command : An special command plug-in provided by framework to implement the Command on top of REST API without writing any java code. (only YAML template is sufficient)
•Command Discoverer – Discovers the available CLI templates (YAML file created by using OPEN-CLI 1.0 schema) placed under OPEN_CLI_HOME directory or its sub-directories and register them into Command Registrar.
•Command Registrar – Maintains the map of command name vs actual command executable
•Main – Provides the interactive/direct command mode to run the commands from Linux OS console
Following sample YAML shows the YAML file used to create the microservice in Open-O using CLI
open_cli_schema_version: 1.0
name: microservice-create
description: Register microservice into Open-O
service:
name: msb
version: v1
parameters:
- name: service-name
description: Open-O service name
type: string
short_option: x
long_option: service-name
is_optional: false
- name: service-version
description: Open-O service version
type: string
short_option: y
long_option: service-version
is_optional: false
- name: service-url
description: Open-O service base url
type: url
short_option: r
long_option: service-url
is_optional: false
- name: node-ip
description: Open-O service running node IP
type: string
- name: node-port
description: Open-O service running node port
type: string
- name: create-or-update
description: Open-O service create or update
type: bool
default_value: true
results:
direction: portrait
attributes:
- name: name
description: Open-O service name
scope: short
type: string
- name: version
description: Open-O service version
scope: short
type: string
- name: url
description: Open-O service base url
scope: short
type: url
- name: status
description: Open-O service status
scope: short
type: long
- name: nodes
description: Open-O service running nodes
scope: long
type: string
- name: location
description: Open-O service location
scope: long
type: url
http:
request:
uri: /services
method: POST
body: '{"serviceName":"${service-name}","version":"${service-version}","url":"${service-url}","protocol":"REST","visualRange":"1","lb_policy":"hash","nodes":[{"ip":"${node-ip}","port":"${node-port}","ttl":0}]}'
headers:
queries:
createOrUpdate: ${create-or-update}
success_codes:
- 201
- 200
result_map:
name: $b{$.serviceName}
version: $b{$.version}
url: $b{$.url}
status: $b{$.status}
nodes: $b{$.nodes[*].ip}:$b{$.nodes[*].port}
location: $h{Location}
|
To provide the required commands for each of the ONAP services, this project will depends on the REST API provided by every other services such as SO, AAI, etc
NOTE: This project delivers CLI and not API
| Name | Description | Version |
|---|---|---|
| Docker | Docker container for CLI | Aligned with existing Docker version of ONAP |
| Ubuntu | For running CLI manually | 14.04 / 16.04 32-bit/64-bit |
| Open JDK | For Java RTE | 1.8 |
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
| Gaps identified | Impact |
|---|---|
| NIL | NIL |
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
| Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
|---|---|---|
| NONE | - |
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
| Date | Project | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| NIL | NIL | NIL |
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset. |
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.