DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.

Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki.
Use the Wiki to document the release plan. Don't provide PowerPoint.
Use as much diagrams and flow charts as you need, directly in the wiki, to convey your message.


Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Multi VIM/CloudBeijing
Project Lifecycle StateCore
Participating Company Amdocs, AT&T, ChinaMobile, Huawei, Intel, Lumina Networks, Microsoft, Mirantis, VMware, WindRiver, ZTE

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Describe the problem being solved by this release

Provide a Cloud Mediation Layer supporting multiple Clouds.

1. Project framework alignment with ONAP R2 S3P goals

2. Transforming towards Model driven

3. Function enhancement as Multi VIM/Cloud mediation layer

Use Cases

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer use case).

All use cases approved for R2

Minimum Viable Product

Describe the MVP for this release.

1 Event/Alert/Metrics federation (S3p)

2 Elastic API exposure (Towards model-driven)

3 Parallelism improvement of Multi Cloud Services (S3p)

4 Logging Enablement  (S3p)

5 Standardized Infrastructure Resource Information Model (Towards model-driven)

6 FCAPS modeling (Towards model-driven)

7 Image service (Function enhancement)

8 Clustering service interfaces for query and placement of a group of resources (Function enhancement)

9 HPA resource discovery and representation for HPA awareness orchestration (Function enhancement)

10 TOSCA-based orchestration to deploy workload on multiple clouds

11 MultiCloud Plugin for K8S (Function enhancement)

12 MultiCloud support for Azure (Function enhancement)

Functionalities

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Functionality Name

In or Out

Priority

Stretch

Clustering placement/query

IN

H

Query capacity and status for a group of resources

Message bus pub/sub

IN and OUT

H

Publish and subscribe events/notification

Resource Hierarchy graph

IN

H

Traverse resource Hierarchy in given Cloud

Image upload/download

IN

M

Support upload and download images

Integration with other project

Functionality Name

In or Out

Priority

Stretch

Logging IntegrationInMIntegrate with Logging

A&AI -Image Manager Integration

In

M

Integrate with A&AI- Image Manager

OOFInHIntegrate with OOF
VFCInHIntegrate with VFC on VM status part
APPCInHIntegrate with APPC on VM status part
SOInHIntegrate with SO on parser adapter

Epics

Stories


Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

This release we targeted to implement MVP features and finish regression of all existing use cases. The longer goal is to intergate with different dependent modules to consume the advanced features.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable Name

Deliverable Description

Source CodeSource code for all Multi VIM/Cloud components
Docker ContainersDocker container  associated componets
DocumentationDeveloper and user documentations


Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Please refer to below graph for a high level project scope architecture.

Please refer to below chart for the even-driven framework.


Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance01show basic performance profiling data in log
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability01show long run result in log
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency12add Multi VIM service and recovery capability
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security01add CII badge passing tests
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability11depends on gepgraphic scaling
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability01enable single logging output
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability22No UI and tutorial documentation need more work
  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation


List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)

Clustering placement/query

Query capacity and status for a group of resources




Message bus pub/sub

Publish and subscribe events/notification




Resource Hierarchy graph

Traverse resource Hierarchy in given Cloud




Container operation

Operate containers




API this project is delivering to other projects.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
To fill outHigh level description of the APIDate for which the API is reviewed and agreedTo fill outLink toward the detailed API description

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion
SO Parser AdapterTranslate Tosca template into VIM function description

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
To fill outTo fill out

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
APPC event integrationkeep the existing waywork together on vm polling part of code
VFC event integrationkeep the existing waywork together on vm polling part of code
DCAE integrationkeep the existing wayidentify examples of alert/metrics

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out

The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset.


Other Information

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.


Charter Compliance

The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.