Agenda

• JIRA board https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=41&view=planning&selectedIssue=OOM-63&epics=visible
• Seshu Kumar Mudiganti from SO - last PTL meeting - would like to discuss scaling and resources - JIRA
• Reviews https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/q/status:open+oom
• OOM-460 configuration work - 
• Helm version 2.3 to 2.8? test 2.7 to 2.8 - fully test this - JIRA 
• 1.6.10, 1.8.6k, 2.3x, 1.12d - 1.6.14, 1.8.6, 2.8.(s/c), 1.12d  Michael O'Brien will test clouds
  
  
  • Borislav Glozman working on it. 
• (borislav 2.6.2 testest on R 1.6.14 - vnc-portal testing
• Amsterdam Release notes - OOM still in "experimental mode" for Amsterdam. 
  • When ready, OOM shall create it's own internal release and let the community know. Target EOW.
• OOM Roadmap Roger Maitland
  • Persistent volumes: Need to identify which components do not have a good strategy for data persistence and add to OOM backlog, i.e. support restart without loss of data.
    • Please read: Did You Know? and OOM for Production-Grade Deployments for Beijing scope details for OOM.
    • Borislav Glozman will provide the analysis of the current state of component consistency. David Sauvageau to add to backlog.
    • Identify special requirements/constraints such as "multiple instances of mariadb shall not share the same inode". The OOM team should drive this. 
      
      • Create a wiki page to identify this, Jerome Doucerain to create initial list.
• Proposal for Scaling of ONAP components. Milind Jalwadi
  • Milind Jalwadi bringing the idea of centralizing ONAP component scaling parameters.
  • Current design proposing helm dependency injection for all configuration management / parameters including scaling
  • OOM should start gathering requirements for each component so that we show how that can be done in OOM. 
    • Create a structure in the wiki, advertise in mailing list.
    • OOM team members should join all component project teams and describe the work required to support scaling in OOM.
  • Are we focused on dynamic scaling, manual scaling or both?
    • Make sure we refine the target for Beijing vs Casablanca.
    • Which tool is used for threshold setting? 
      • For manual scaling, probably in helm
      • For auto-scaling, need to involve the component teams to figure out how K8S can be used to scale each of the components,
        • teams are looking for guidance, 
        • Split the work across many team members here. 
• Update on config management Mike Elliott
  
  •  Some parameters should maybe populated at run time, e.g. openstack configurations (there will be multiple openstack configs). 
    • This is an SO + AAI requirement more than an OOM requirement. Should be brought to the ARCH sub-committee. Yury Novitsky to bring the issue to the discuss list.
• Pavan Gupta faced issues installing ONAP Amsterdam from OOM. Recommendation: use Master, was tested on CI/CD to be working. Michael O'Brien - (deprecated as of 20170508) - use obrienlabs and Alexis de Talhouët to support if required
• Question / Technical issue: Should MSB discover services automatically? 
  • In Amsterdam, need to manually provide the Token. On master this is done automatically. 
  • OOM defect will be opened and discuss list conversation will be started. Hong Guan and Jun Hu
• Consul health checks
  • Some components are not providing standard ways to provide health checks. 
• OOM Backlog sanity
• Anything of interest...

Michael O'Brien to update the new sprint JIRA board

Notes

• TODO: put cd.sh into the oom repo - https://github.com/obrienlabs/onap-root/blob/master/cd.sh