Description

5G RAN physical/logical topology information (SDN-R) Core & RAN elements. 5G Configuration, provisioning of a 5G Network. SDN-R should contain the 5G Network Topology. CM Audit. CM Mediation. CM run-time storage / data persistency (MariaDB)

- it was decided that the RunTime Config DB will be part of CCSDK in R6. The new project proposal as RunTime Config DB will be for R7, but it is being worked on in the R6 timeframe.

TopicWiki Link
PROJECT PROPOSAL

Configuration Persistence Service Project

Target for R7 Guilin

(All Project Proposals)New Project Proposals
COMPONENT DESCRIPTIONARC RunTime DB Component Description - R6 Frankfurt
ARCHITECTURE FLOWSARCHCOM: InfoFlow - RunTime Config DB Information Flow

BUSINESS DRIVER

This section describes Business Drivers needs.

Executive Summary - 5G RAN physical/logical topology information (SDN-R) Core & RAN elements. 5G Configuration, provisioning of a 5G Network. SDN-R should contain the 5G Network Topology. CM Audit. CM Mediation. CM run-time storage / data persistency (MariaDB). Configuration Management is a major LCM/OAM function with many operations. This use case will be a multi-release effort.

Business Impact - The ability to configure a RAN network (CU/DU) PNF and VNF with ONAP is a critical business function because configuration management is a core LCM/OAM operation.

Business Markets - This use case applies to any domain (wireless, transport, optical, wireline) that ONAP will manage. It is not a market specific function.

Funding/Financial Impacts - This use case represents a large potential OPEX savings for operators because of the ability to configure networks saving time and expenses.

Organization Mgmt, Sales Strategies - There is no additional organizational management or sales strategies for this use case outside of a service providers "normal" ONAP deployment and its attendant organizational resources from a service provider.


Other CM Topics (future releases)

DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS

The REQ (requirements) epic for this Use Case is 

NOTE: 1. Collect Configuration data via Netconf with VES CM notify notification.descoped from R6

2. Support all vendor specific Configuration Information Model ( CIM/Yang) descoped from R6

PROJECTPTLUser Story / EpicRequirement
A&AIEpic #1: Base RunTime DB Development

E1: A&AI Provides initial physical inventory info to ConfigDB


AAF

APPC


CLAMP

CC-SDK (Controller)
Epic #1: Base RunTime DB DevelopmentE1a. Provide RunTime DB yang model to RunTime DB.
DCAEEpic #1: Base RunTime DB Development

E1a. VES/DCAE pathway to provide configuration notification RunTime DB

E1b. VES Event Listener Document to be updated.

E1c. New VES Event domain (CM Notify) to be introduced (DCAE VES Listener)

DMaaPEpic #1: Base RunTime DB DevelopmentE1a. VES/DCAE pathway to provide configuration notification RunTime DB
External API

MODELINGEpic #1: Base RunTime DB DevelopmentE1a. Design-Time modeling; Platform ONAP Model for RunTime DB to build initial structure. Use of onboarded Yang model (in vendor PNF package).

Multi-VIM /

Cloud



OOFShankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan

POLICY



PORTAL

ControllerEpic #1: Base RunTime DB Development

SDN-R and Controller Impact

E1a. Provide RunTime DB yang model to RunTime DB.

E1a. SO + Controller pathway BACK to the PNF through Netconf to update RunTime DB.

SDC

SO

VID


VNFRQTS

VNF-SDK

CDS

List of PTLs:Approved Projects


ARCHITECTURE DISCUSSION

The architecture discussion held on Sept 10, 2019 and Sept 3, 2019 centered around the discussion about where the RunTime DB should architecturally live.

some choices are: (1) have RunTime DB as a platform component (2) have it was a part of a controller (3) have it as part of the common services (4) have it as part of CC-SDK (as part of common services).

See the supporting files which has the slides & discussion notes

The WIKI page for ARC RunTime DB Component is at:

ARC RunTime DB Component Description - R6 Frankfurt

MEETINGS

 - 

DATEMeetingWiki Page

 

RunTime Config DB discussion2019-10-18 Meeting notes

 

RunTime Config DB team meeting Project ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Oct 25, 2019

 

RunTime Config DB team meeting Project ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Nov 1, 2019

 

RunTime Config DB team meeting Project ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Nov 8, 2019

 

RunTime Config DB team meeting Project ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Nov 15, 2019

 

RunTime config DB team meeting project proposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Dec 13, 2019

 

RunTime Config DB team meetingRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Jan 10, 2019

 

RunTime Config DB team meetingRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Jan 24, 2019

 

RunTime Config DB team meetingRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Jan 31, 2019

 

RunTime Config DB team meetingRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Feb 7, 2019

 

Project ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Feb 14, 2019

 

Project ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Feb 21, 2019

 


RunTime Config DB Meeting notes Feb 28, 2019

 

R7 ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Mar 6, 2020

 

R7 ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Mar 13, 2020

 

R7 ProposalRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Mar 20, 2020

 

TSC

Peer Review

Name Discussion

RunTime Config DB Meeting notes Mar 27, 2020

 

Name DiscussionRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Apr 3, 2020

 

Proposal Review from TSC / IssuesRunTime Config DB Meeting notes Apr 10, 2020

 

Read the Docs

R6 RC0 status

RunTime Config DB Meeting notes Apr 17, 2020

 

sample-landingpage Project Home Pagehttps://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/2020+April+Technical+Event+Schedule

 

DiscussionConfiguration & Persistency Service Meeting notes Apr 24, 2020

 

TSC Q&A answersConfiguration & Persistency Service Meeting notes Apr 29, 2020



TBDJoint Discussion with Harmonization Team
TBD

Joint Discussion with Network Slicing Team


TBDJoint Discussion with OOF/SON/PCI team






SUPPORTING FILES:

DocumentFiles
Run Time DB Overview and presentation

Run Time DB Architecture Presentation (Made to Arch S/C) with discussion


ANSWERS TO TSC (May 13 2020)

ConfigurationPersistencySvc_13My2020v5.pptx

Data Persistency Service


INTEGRATION & TESTING

This section discusses the Testing & Integration for R6 PnP

  1. WHO IS TESTING - what company, team, and people will be doing the testing & responsibilities for testing.
  2. TEST ENVIRONMENT - which does the lab & test environment.
  3. RESOURCES NEEDED - what resources are needed.
  4. WHO IS CONTRIBUTING RESOURCES - what resources will be provided and by whom/what company.
  5. NETWORK CONNECTIVITY - Network connectivity
  6. TEST/INTEGRATION LEADERSandeep Shah , Dongho Kim
  7. INTEGRATION LEAD DEFINITION - ONAP "Use Case/Requirement" Integration Lead

RunTime Config DB Integration Test Cases. These can be navigated to from the Integration team page hierarchy.