The page is intended to summarize all the requirements for Frankfurt Release.

These requirements have been prioritized by the TSC to realistically fit within the Frankfurt Release Timeline.

The Release Scope should be finalized during the M1 Release Planning milestone on November 7th, 2019

TSC Prioritization (Ranking)

Scorecard Key

Release 6 (Frankfurt) proposed use cases and functional requirements

M1 Scorecard:

Other Milestones:

Architecture:




(star) T-Shirt Size: Ballpark estimation for assessing the development/testing activities performed by the project team; not the integration team

Use Case

JIRA link (REQ)

One issue per requirement.

Instructions

Owner(s)TSC Ranking

M1

Scorecard

TSC M1 Approval Recommendation

M2/M3

Scorecard

 

 TSC M2/M3

Approval

M4 Scorecard  TSC M4 ApprovalRC0 ScorecardTSC RC0 Approval Link(s) to HLD/LLD if anyDependency (from/to) another project(s)

T-Shirt Size (star)

Project's Impact: Test Only (TO), Code (C)

Committed (C)/ Partially Committed (P) or not (N) per impacted project


If Partially or not committed, what are the project gaps (FTE, reqs, etc)Integration Lead(s)Company EngagementNotes
Third Party Operational Domain Manager

REQ-17 - Third Party Operational Domain Manager In Progress

RANK #0

GREEN

YES

GREEN

YES

GREEN

YESGREEN

GO

Tracked as #45 on 2: Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status



Third-party Operational Domain Manager
S

SDC (C)

SO (TO)

AAI (TO)

Changes being done in local setup

SDC: Committed based on Telstra contribution

[TSC]: What does it mean? No SDC contribution to the ONAP Community.

[Atif]:Changes were temporarily done locally, when the ElAlto branch wasn't cut and we couldn't commit to master

Will commit after review discussion with SDC PTL


[TSC]:What's the status? PTL OK?

[Atif] PTL is OK. Code commit started.

TelstraComplete company commitment for delivery of Frankfurt Scope for this use case
Service Resolver Features

rene.robert@orange.comRANK #4

NO





Service Resolver

SDC (C), SO (C), AAI (TO)No SO decisionMISSING INFOMISSING INFOOrange
CMPv2 CA Plugin for AAF

RANK #3

Confirmed by AAF PTL


YES

Update 1/24:

The new approved committers resolved the risk for not getting the code committed into the project. The approval of a new targeted solution from ‘ArchCom’ results in no dependency on AAF CertMan, thus our previous major risks for delay has been resolved.

This new design has resulted in a larger contribution than intially planned, which introduces a new risk of delay due to not sufficient time.


YES


M4 Exception request. Full functionality postponed to RC0 due to late M2/M3 milestone achievement in relation to AAF issues.

Main parts of functionality delivered. First E2E test successfully done.


Exception agreed with Integration PTL (Morgan)

Pending agreement with AAF team (John, Jonathan) 



YES

16.04.2020 && 09.04.2020 update:

OOM integration still not finalized. OOM experts (Sylvain and Krzysztof) are working with Nokia and E/// to finalize OOM contribution. Contribution which left can also be considered as integration effort as only OOM repo is going to be updated. AAF part is over.


02.04.2020 update:

OOM integration is almost over.  First manual installation on Nokia lab was ok with some workarounds in different charts, but there is a problem in other charts that blocks success verification on Orange lab.


26.03.2020 update:

Still one week is required to finalize this requirement.

E2E (client↔server↔CMPv2 server) functionality delivered.

Two tasks left - AAF's new microservice-OOM integration (AAF-1083) and secure communication between CertService's client and CertService (AAF-1084).


GO

April 9:

Damian Nowak says that code is complete.  Will update integration test status

April 15:

Tracked as #43 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status (same item as for REQ-76)



XL -

AAF (C)

Integration (C)

AAF: (C)

Integration:(C)

See notes

AT&T

Ericsson

Nokia


Note: Nokia and Ericsson volunteered to work this. As PTL, I approved the path forward (create Client, build plugin, etc) but was unable to create actual REQ. Please consider this working item until them.

(update : created, at the moment we do not expect multiple release impacts but it has to be further checked)

ALSO... This MAY be a multi-release effort, which will not affect normal Operations in anyway, if CMPv2 isn't completed within Frankfurt.

CCVPN:

E-LINE Service over OTN NNI

LIN MENG

RANK #2


YES

Note:

Functional impacts and API changes in the related modules have been  reported and documented.

To be more specific :

API changes in A&AI and SDN-C are committed and merged.

OOF: Swagger API document  is provided; coding has be started by last week.

U-UI has no API change, resource are in the coding phase now;


YES

Note:

  • Code in impacted modules has been merged.


  • Documentation has been submitted.


  • Ready for integration test.
YES

For AAI, UUI & OOF  integration test are completed using snapshot version and waiting for released version of UUI and OOF for testing with Frankfurt version.

SDN-C testing hasn't been finished yet.

GO

Tracked as #12.1, 12.2 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

E-LINE over OTN Inter-Domain Links - Proposal

XL 

(Multiple releases)

TO: SO;

C: U-UI, A&AI, OOF, SDN-C

U-UI committed by ChinaMobile;

A&AI committed by Huawei;

OOF committed by Huawei;

SDN-C committed by Huawei


China Mobile, Huawei

End to End Layer 1 Service Management. Modeling the Optical Service

RANK #3

CCSDK PTL has confirmed he can deliver it

YES


Functional requirements & corresponding APIs have been documented across:

A&AI, SDNC, CCSDK - merge in progress

SO - coding phase

UUI - coding phase

YES

Code has been merged for following modules: A&AI, SDNC, UUI

Documentation has been merged

SO code changes are currently under discussion & might require design change causing delay or reducing scope of use-case. (Risk identified under Frankfurt risks)

3/11 update:

SO changes have been resubmitted & is under review. Have preliminary agreement from PTL (seshu). All other impacted modules has been merged.

3/18 update:

Previous resubmission has been merged. Some small fixes are submitted and ready for merge. 

3/25 update:

Ready for integration test.



YES



Integration test cases have been executed across SO, SDNC, A&AI, UUI components based on available version

Waiting on official F release version for verification 

GO

Tracked as #12.1 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

Multi-domain Optical Network ServicesCCVPN use-case alignmentXL (Multiple releases)

TO: SDC, ExtAPI

C: UUI, SO, A&AI, SDN-C, CCSDK

SO - C

A&AI - C

SDN-C - C

UUI - C

CCSDK-C

SDC - TO

ExtAPI - TO

Code will be committed by Fujitsu


Have gained PTL agreement & JIRA epics have been created under UUI, SO, SDNC, A&AI, CCSDKXin Miao

AT&T

Orange

Fujitsu

Working with CCVPN team to align towards common modelling for OTN

Deploying Distributed External functions


RANK #0



YES

YES





Depends on development progress of Multi-Cloud K8S work.

(K8S based Cloud region support (Continue from R4))

XL 

(Multiple releases)

TO: Multi-Cloud

Intel will contribute to this.

There is no code development and it is for testing the work being done in MC project.


Intel, Aarna, TM






Requirements

M1 Scorecard:


Architecture:





Requirement

JIRA link (REQ)

One issue per requirement.

Instructions

OwnerTSC RankingM1 Scorecard

TSC M1 Approval

Recommendations

M2/M3 Scorecard M2/M3 TSC Approval M4 ScorecardM4 TSC ApprovalRC0 Scorecard RC0 TSC approval Link(s) to HLD/LLD if anyDependency (from/to) another project(s)T-Shirt Size (XS, S, M, L, XL) (star)Project's Impact: Test Only (TO), Code (C), Documentation Only (DO)Committed (C)/Partially Committed (P) or not (N) per Impacted projectsIf Partially or not Committed, what are gaps/ project (people/FTEs; HLD/LLD; etc)Integration LeadCompany EngagementNotes

All Control Loop Policy Models should be TOSCA Compliant

Operational, Guard Policies

RANK #2

YES

YES

YES


GO

Track as #39 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

TOSCA Compliant Policy TypesSDCM

CLAMP - C

POLICY - C

CLAMP - C

POLICY - C

committed by AT&T & Ericsson


AT&T

Ericsson


Policy Update Notifications

RANK #2

YES

YES

YES


GO

Track as #40 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

Policy Update Notifications
S

DCAE - C

POLICY - C

DCAE - C

POLICY - C

committed by AT&T


AT&T

Wipro

DCAE: Commitment based on Wipro
CLAMP Deployment of Policies to PDP Groups

RANK #3

YES

YES

YES


GO

Track as #41 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

CLAMP Deployment of Policies to PDP Groups
M

CLAMP - C

POLICY- C

CLAMP - C

POLICY - C

committed by AT&T


Project Pairwise Testing

Gervais-Martial Ngueko

Pamela Dragosh


AT&T

Ericsson


Integration of CDS as Actor in Control Loops

RANK #3

YES

YES

YES

GO

Track as #42 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

CDS actor support in Policy

L

CLAMP - C

POLICY - C

CDS - C

Integration - C

CLAMP - C

POLICY - C

CDS - C

Integration - C

Partial commitment from Bell Canada to support Policy+CDS integration.


Partial commitment from Huawei to support 
CDS+CLAMP integration.


undefined undefined

Bruno Sakoto

Adil Mir

Vidyashree Rama

Gaurav Agrawal

AT&T

Bell Canada

Ericsson 

Huawei

Orange


Control Loop Tutorial Documentation


RANK #3

YES



YES

Only Documentation

No resources for Integration

YES

Limited resources

Synchro with Sel-Serve Control-Loop

De-scoped, based on feedback from Eric Debeau

CLAMP, DCAE, POLICYM

Documentation  - DO


DOC - C (Orange)

POLICY - C (AT&T)

DCAE - C (AT&T)

CLAMP - C (AT&T)


No integration tests

Bell Canada,

AT&T,

Orange


Component Upgrades to new Policy Lifecycle API

RANK #2



YES

YES

YES


GO

Track as #42 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status



M

SDNC - C

OOF - C

POLICY - C

POLICY - C (AT&T & Intel)

OOF - C (Intel)

SDNC - C (AT&T)




AT&T, Intel
Modeling: Enhanced Nested and Shared Service Information Model - 5G / E2E Network Slicing modeling

Swaminathan Seetharaman

Shankaranarayanan Puzhavakath Narayanan

TSC: Replaced by new E2E Network Slicing Scope

No commitment to cover ExtAPI









NETWORK SLICING PoC in R6 Frankfurt (Obsolete)

 SDC

Possibly dependent on 

 L

SDC-C

AAI-C

External API

Company commitment per component

SDC - C (Amdocs)

AAI - C (Amdocs)


*Note: Not sure integration lead is needed for modeling

Borislav Glozman

Swaminathan Seetharaman

LIN MENG

CMCC

Amdocs

AT&T

Wiprc

Huawei


5G / OOF SON Enhancement

RANK #3



CCSDK is not required

YES

YES

YES

GO

Track as #9 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

OOF (SON) in R5 El Alto, OOF (SON) in R6 Frankfurt

Runtime DB

Possibly dependent on 

(see Notes)

L

POLICY - C

OOF - C

DCAE - C

SDN-C - C

Integration (Demo VNFs) - C


(See Notes)


POLICY - C

OOF - C

DCAE - C

SDN-C - C

                                               

Integration (Demo VNFs) - C

DCAE, Integration: -      Wipro commits

OOF, Policy: - AT&T commits

SDN-C:    IBM commits


AT&T

Wipro

IBM

RAN-Simulator submitted as part of simulators repo.

Originally Runtime DB was also indicated as a potentially impacted component, however, it is not a part of Frankfurt release. So the necessary functionality for this use case (for Frankfurt) is continued to be realized using ConfigDB.

5G / Run-time Data Persistency (RunTime Config DB) and VES Model relations, VES CM model (CM Notify).

RANK #3

PTL has confirmed he can deliver  CCSDK, SDN-C

YES

YES

(see Project Wiki). Agreed to functionality in CC-SDK has been code-submitted.

Reduced scope: No CM Notify VES event; No CIM/Yang.

YES

GO

Tracked as item 46: Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status


CONFIGURATION & PERSISTENCY SERVICECM Notify VES Event (defined by Harmonized U/C) this U/C will actually use the CMNotify VES event and DCAE development to use the Event.L

A&AI - TO

SDC - TO

Controller - C

RunTime DB (new component) - C

DCAE - C

A&AI - C

SDC - C

Controller - C

RunTime DB (new component) - C

DCAE - C

Controller, RunTimeDB,  - IBM commits

SDC (TO) - AmDocs will commit

DCAE -  Nokia commits

A&AI Testing - IBM will do testing.


Sandeep Shah

Nokia

AT&T

Will be a new component, presented at Architecture S/C.
Modeling: GeoLocation Model (and standards harmonization)Modeling work onlyRANK #0

YES

YES



PNF PLUG and PLAY in R6 FrankfurtAAIMN/AN/A
N/A

Ericsson

Nokia


PNF / PNF Software Upgrade using direct Netconf/Yang interface with PNF

RANK #2

SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting.

YES

YES

YELLOW

Main function is merged. PNF upgrade procedure is working.

  • No VID GUI, but upgrade work flow still can be triggered by CLI (via SO API).
  • Custom upgrade workflow is not completed. But PNF upgrade still be done using SO hardcode workflow.
YES

GO

Track as #23 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

PNF software upgrade in R6 Frankfurt
XL

SDC: C

SO: C

CDS: C

VID: C

Integration: C/DO

VNFRQTS: DO

SDC: (C)

SO: (C)

CDS: (C)

VID: (C)

Integration: (C)

Integration, SDC, SO, VID, CDS, and VNFRQTS are committed by Ericsson. SO is committed by Huawei


Eric Moore

Ericsson

Huawei


PNF / Enable PNF software version at onboarding

RANK #2

Clarification: No impact on SO or VNF-SDK in R6.

YES

YES

YES

Recommend GO

Track as #24 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status



M

SDC: C

Integration: C

VNFRQTS: DO

SDC: C

Integration: C

SDC, Integration and VNFRQTS are committed by Ericsson


Ericsson
LCM API Evolution

TSC: Please merge with REQ-84

Oskar: Done, REQ-84 contains the R6 user stories related to this requirement.









https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/50202249/2019-07-02%20ONAP_R6_Controller_Evolution_LCM_APIs.pptx?api=v2
N/A

Development in R6 will be part of REQ-84

N/A
N/AEricsson

Main goals:

  • Support use of CDS for LCM actions
  • Improved PNF LCM support
PNF / Enhancement on PNF Software Upgrade with EM with Ansible


RANK #2

SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting.

YES

YES


YES

GO

Track as #16 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

PNF software upgrade in R6 FrankfurtLCM API EvolutionM

SO: C

CCSDK: C

Integration:C

SO: C

CCSDK: C

Integration:C

Huawei commitment to SO,CCSDK,Integration


Enbo Wang


Huawei


PNF / PNF Software Upgrade with EM with Netconf

yaoguang wang

RANK #2

SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting.

YES

YES

03/11: Good progress so far. Based on good achievements of  REQ-84 in SO and CDS, minor changes have been done. Test Status: Completed (see notes).

YES

GO

Track as #37 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

PNF software upgrade in R6 Frankfurt

Notes: Test procedures and test results will be record soon in: PNF software upgrade with Netconf/Yang interface with EM

PNF Software Upgrade using direct Netconf/Yang interface with PNFM

SO: C

CDS: C

Integration:C

SO: C

CDS: C

Integration:C

Huawei commitment to SO, CDS, Integration


Enbo WangHuawei
5G / ORAN & 3GPP Standards Harmonization

Modeling Only for Frankfurt

RANK #0


YES

green for A1 part (code merged)

O1 enhancements moved to G release

YES

YES

GO

Track as #22 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

MOBILITY STANDARDS HARMONIZATION WITH ONAP
M

SDNC: C

DCAE: C

SDN-C: C

DCAE: C

SDN-C (A1 adaptor) committed by Ericsson & IBM

DCAE committed by Nokia


Sandeep Shah (A1, O1)

AT&T

Nokia

Ericsson

DCAE: Impact for adopting new VES domain; Committed based on Nokia support.

A1 Adapter implementation has been tested against A1 Mediator (1.0.0)

5G / License Management

RANK #0


ANSWER: There is no S/W development in R6. Company Commitment is commitment to work on Modeling & Architecture work for R6. Most of this U/C will be modeling development.


YES

No API, No S/W

YES

YES

GO


LICENSING MANAGEMENTSDCM

Modeling: DO

VNFRQTS, after UCs agreed: DO


SDC(*)

( *) No code or test impact expected in R6 as an outcome of the proposed UCs

Nokia and Ericsson commit to:
Modeling: C
VNFRQTS: C


N/A

AT&T

Nokia

Ericsson

Orange

No development.

Activity driven by Nokia and Ericsson is Use Case development.

The UCs and modeling are done in synch.

5G / Bulk PM / PM Control

RANK #2

SO impact clarified and agreed in SO weekly meeting.

YES

SO impact changed from C to TO. Instead added dependency to REQ-134 for SO PNF workflow enhancements. Also added REQ-25 as new dependency.

Added AAI, CLAMP, Policy, SDNC and CCSDK as TO.

YES

Main parts of use case delivered.

A few user stories related to undeploying micro-service have been postponed.

CLAMP cannot be used currently due to following bug that will not be fixed by M4 date:

---

Mar 06 clarification:

Proposing M4 with reduced scope rather than extension request:

  • In R6, use of DCAE GUIs for micro-service deployment and configuration rather than CLAMP
YES

GO

Track as #6 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

5G Bulk PM in Frankfurt/R6

REQ-25

REQ-33

REQ-134

XL

DCAE: C

Integration: C

SO: TO

AAI: TO

CLAMP: TO

Policy: TO

SDNC: TO

CCSDK: TO

All code and test committed by Ericsson for the listed projects.
user-3784d        EricssonDCAE: Committed based on Ericsson support
5G / Bulk PM / Secure Communication between xNFs and ONAP

Pawel BaniewskiRANK #2

YES

Currently marked yellow due to dependency to REQ-140.

02/03 - Pawel recommends de-scoping



5G Bulk PM in Frankfurt/R6AAF (REQ-140)S

DCAE: C

DCAE: C

Nokia Commits to DCAE: C Development


NokiaDCAE: Committed based on Nokia support
5G / PM dictionary

RANK #2

YES

VES spec updated, reviewed and approved.  

Reconfiguration of SDC is in progress (JSON file change)


YES

YES

No integration testing required for this requirement.

Testing is only required at SC level

GO


FM META DATA & PM DICTIONARY in R6 Frankfurt
S

SDC: Update GAB Config File (no S/W update)

DCAE: DOC

DCAE: VES Event Reg Spec

SDC - C

DCAE - C

Nokia Commits to SDC, DCAE - C


Damian Nowak

AT&T

Ericsson

Nokia

DCAE: No code impact on VES reg yaml updates
5G / 5G NRM Network Resource Model (Configuration Mgmt)

yaoguang wangRANK #3

No commitment from SO lack of design, resource, etc

Confirmation from yaoguang wang that the feature can be delivered even without SO.

YES

SO: requirements reviewed and approved. No additional API impacts.

CDS: requirements approved. Parts of executor codes merged.

YES

YES

GO

Track as #38 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

5G Network Resource Model (NRM) Configuration in R6 Frankfurt
M

SO: C

CDS: C

Modeling: DOC

Integration: C

SO: C

CDS: C

Modeling: P

Integration: C

Huawei commitment to SO, CDS, Integration


yaoguang wangHuawei
5G / 5G Service Modeling: Modeling (exploratory) work for creating a 5G ServiceModeling Work Only (No REQ)

RANK #0


ANSWER: It is just modeling in R6. AT&T and Nokia commits to working with Modeling S/C work.


YES

YES

YES

GO 5G RAN SERVICE MODELING & DEFINITION in R6 Frankfurt
N/AModeling: CModeling: C
N/A (No integration or testing impact)

Nokia

AT&T

Modeling work only
PNF / Plug and Play


Benjamin Cheung

RANK #2

Committed by SO PTL during the TSC call on 11/21

YES


02/03 - scope reduced by removing external cert work

YES

Mar 05

M4 on Reduced scope (see Wiki)

YES

missing a release of SDNC component in version 1.8.1+

GO

Track as #5 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

PNF PLUG and PLAY in R6 FrankfurtAAF (REQ-140)M

DCAE: C

SO: C

VID: C

DCAE: C

SO: C

VID: C

NOKIA Committed to DCAE, SO and VID Development


Nokia

DCAE: SDK Dmaap lib refactor; committed based on Nokia support

16.04:

Currently released image for SO-BPMN (1.6.0 form27'th of March) is not working.

Image from today 16.04 is sufficient and works. v2/onap/so/bpmn-infra/manifests/1.6.0-20200416T0645 
→ There will be need to release new SO images


PNF / Configuration with NETCONF/ Secure Communication between xNFs and ONAP

RANK #3

YES


YES

M4 Exception request: Full functionality postponed to RC0 due to  late M2/M3 milestone achievement in relation to AAF issues.

Exception discussed and agreed with SDNC and Integration PTLs.

SO removed from test scope.

YES

April 15 update:

Updated integration item number

April 9 update:

OOM integration is still ongoing. Working with OOM experts and Nokia to finalize the contribution.

See also RC0 update for REQ-140 (dependency).

Mar 26 update:

Estimating that one more week is needed to complete this feature.

See SDNC-926 and REQ-140 for AAF dependency.

Discussions with Integration and SDNC PTLs are ongoing.


GO

Track as #43 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

Configuration with NETCONF in Frankfurt/R6

Dependency on AAF (REQ-140)
 


M

SDNC: C

Integration: C


SDNC: C

Integration: C

SDNC and Integration committed by Ericsson


Mariusz SobuckiEricsson


PNF / PNF pre-onboarding onboarding

RANK #2


YES

YES

Mar 05

Reduced scope. See Wiki

YES

GO

Track as #8 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

PNF/VNF PREONBOARDING / ONBOARDING in R6 Frankfurt
S

VNFSDK: C

Integration: TO

VNFSDK: C

Integration: C

Nokia Commits to VNFSDK and Integration - C


Nokia

Ericsson

16.04:

New image has been released /onap/vnfsdk/refrepo:1.5.1 

  • package integrity rules are present (SOL004 option 1) - need to have prepared  automated test cases
  • PNF SW update validation rules are present need to have prepared  automated test cases
  • Full integration  automation of pre-onboarding and onboarding tests is ongoing
Modeling: Runtime instance model based on A&AI reverse engineering

Modeling Work Only

RANK #0


YES

YES

YES

GO Reverse-engineering AAI data model to Papyrus information modelAAIS

AAI: No code changes, updating missing fields in schema

Modeling only. No new implementation requirements

AT&T commits to the bug fix
N/A, producing a model file only, not a use case

AT&T

Ericsson

Huawei

Orange


Modeling: documentation of policy resource modelModeling Work OnlyAndy MayerRANK#0

YES

Policy resource model No-Go for Frankfurt R6.







PolicyMModeling only. No new implementation requirements


AT&T
Modeling: documentation of allotted resource modelModeling Work OnlyAndy MayerRANK #0


YES

 

YES

YES

GO

SDC

MModeling only. No new implementation requirements


AT&T
Scaling Extensions

RANK #2


YES

YES

YES

GO

Track as #11 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

Scaling Use Case (Frankfurt)

APPC

CCSDK/CDS

SO

 S-M

APPC - C

CCSDK - TO

SO - C

APPC - C

CCSDK - C

SO -C (Actor selection of CDS and APPC)

APPC - Nokia Shanghai

CCSDK - Tech Mahindra

SO - Tech Mahindra



Marco Platania

AT&T

Nokia/Shanghai

Nokia/Poland

Tech Mahindra

Orange


APPC Ansible automation with VNF-C LCM support / CHM

RANK #2

YES

YES

YES

GO

Track as #15 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

Change Management Frankfurt Extensions

APPC

Integration

S

APPC: C

Integration: C

APPC and Integration Commited by Orange
@Lukasz Rajewski

Orange

AT&T

Implementation completed. Integration tests TBD on WindRivier lab jointly with 

vFW Traffic Distribution with Software Upgrade / CHM

RANK #2

YES

YES

YES

GO

Track as #15 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

Change Management Frankfurt ExtensionsIntegrationXSIntegration: CIntegration Commited by Orange
@Lukasz Rajewski

Orange

AT&T

Implementation completed. Documentation still to be updated. Integration tests TBD on WindRivier lab jointly with 

Portal Security Enhancements

RANK #1

Confirmation from

Manoop Talasila

that the feature can be delivered even without Policy.

YES

YES

OJSI-190 waived.  Portal team to publish vulnerability in Frankfurt release notes (PORTAL-863)





MUSICL

Policy: C

VID: C

SDC: C

Portal partially committed by AT&T, IBM

SDC: C

Partially committed by Samsung (to support OJSI tickets)

Dominik Mizyn (for OJSI tickets)

AT&T

Samsung

IBM


Portal Technology Stack Upgrade and New reporting features

Manoop TalasilaRANK #3

Confirmation from

Manoop Talasila

that the feature can be delivered even without Policy.

YES

YES

YES

GO

Portal is ready with docker tag 3.2.0-STAGING-latest, however on-top of working to release the dockers as "3.2.0" final tag.

Angular Upgrade to latest version

Performance and Optimization


XL

Policy: C

VID: C


Portal committed by AT&T, IBM


Partially committed by Samsung (to support Springboot upgrade on "portal" repo)

Partially committed by IBM for test automation

GAPS: No resources to support portal/sdk repo for Springboot upgrade.

Sireesh Chintamani (Overall Integration Lead)

Sunder Tattavarada  (for Angular upgrade)

Dominik Mizyn (for Springboot upgrade on "portal" repo)

Leimeng Shi (for reporting feature)

AT&T

Samsung

IBM

Implementation completed. Documentation still to be updated.

Very close to release first version of docker images in staging to start the pairwise testing.

ETSI Alignment Support

RANK #2

SDC No more required

YES

YES

YES

GO

Track as #26 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

ETSI Alignment Support
XL

SO: C

SOL003 Adapter: C

SOL005 Adapter: C

ETSI Catalog Mgr: C

SOL002 Adapter: C

SO (C): committed by Ericsson and others with scale back scope

ETSI Catalog Mgr (C): committed by CMCC

SOL003 Adapter (C): committed by Ericsson with scale back scope 

SOL005 Adapter (C): committed by Verizon with scale back scope

SOL002 Adapter (C): committed by Samsung with scale back scope






Andrew Fenner

Ericsson

Verizon

CMCC

Samsung

Intel


Architecture - Modelling Alignment

Stephen TerrillTSC: Remove from the Frankfurt tracking. Ongoing discussions









L

SDC

Modelling






Vertical Industry Oriented On-demand 5G Slice Service (this is merged with Network Slicing use case, and has become E2E Network Slicing)

LIN MENG

TSC: This requirement is now merged with Network Slicing. No more individual tracking












Modeling, U-UI, SO, DCAENA

China Mobile,

Tencent,

Huawei

Merged with E2E Network Slicing use case

E2E Network Slicing

There are two parts:

  •  CSMF, NSMF in ONAP with external (core) NSSMF with a plug-in to SO is ArchCom approved.
    That is SO and External API impacts.
  • External CSMF with NSMF in ONAP with SO plug-in for core NSSM is Arch com approved
  • Arch clarification:
  • no NSSMF (potentially PoC only) in ONAP
  • There are impacts to OOF; It will be based on the HAS functionality, but modifying the constrints
  • AAI -> new schema (no code change).
  • SDC -> test only
  • Policy -> test only.
  • UUI has the CSMF portal and NSMF portal.
  • SO has new workflows to reprent the CSMF and NSMF and "NSSMF adapter"
  • External API exposes the NSMF NB APIs and shares the API definition with UUI.
  • For a example E2E slice. There is a NSI (E2E) - (1:1) - NSSI (E2E) – (NSSI (core) + NSSI (RAN).; howver for frankfurt, we assume that the NSSMF is outside ONAP, hence the "core NSSI handling" is "e2e".

The above is a clarification consistent with previous archcom decisions, but detailing it more and is considered architecturally consistent given the scope (NSSMF outside ONAP).

The following is not approved:

  • How the NSSMF is in ONAP
  • Slice across two domains (i.e. core and ran)..



RANK #3

TSC:

  • For the network slicing.  The following is a Go from architecture
    • SO plug-in to an External NSSMF (for core).
    • CSMF and NSMF representation in ONAP, and also allowing CSMF external.
    • What is not approved is NSSMF in ONAP; nor connecting two subslices together as that requires the NSSMF and that still needs quite some more discussion.

This should limit the impacts to SO and External API for Frankfurt 

Based on revisited scope i.e. SO and ExtAPI, OOF and UUI




----------------


Lin Meng's comment  (21st Nov):


a) 15th &18th Nov: LinMeng's Mail sent to TSC explaining the "exception".

b) 19th Nov: Steve's clarification of Arc decision in the first column.

c) 20th Nov: Swami's Mail sent to TSC requesting OOF and UUI inclusion in scope (resource commitments and PTL agreements available)

d) 21st Nov: LinMeng updated the columns for impacted modules, commitments based on the request sent to TSC ,  for TSC reference when in discussion


Please help change the status to Green

YES considering

#1 SO, ExtAPI  UUI scope only

#2 NSSMF is outside ONAP

#3 OOF is exceptionally added and will be reviewed at M2

--------------------


Lin Meng (21st Nov)

Confirmation:

1)Yes, we can deliver this feature for Frankfurt even without ExtAPI.

2) The impact in EXT-API for Frankfurt is only minimal impact, the resource has been identified and will be commited.


Please help change the status to YES


(See Notes)

YES

(See Notes)

YES

Integration test is in progress.

GO

Track as #10 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

E2E Network Slicing Use Case in R6 FrankfurtSDCXL

SO : C

EXT-API : C 

POLICY : TO

SDC : TO

A&AI : TO

U-UI : C

OOF : C

LinMeng updated on 21st Nov based on the request sent to TSC for including U-UI and OOF into scope, for TSC reference when in discussion

EXT-API : C (Huawei, Wipro)


SO : C (Wipro, China Mobile, Huawei)

POLICY : C (Wipro)

SDC: C (China Mobile, Amdocs)

A&AI : C (Huawei, Amdocs)


U-UI : C (China Mobile)

OOF : C (AT&T, Wipro)


LinMeng updated on 21st Nov:

Reply to TSC Concern:

1)Yes, we can deliver this feature for Frankfurt even without ExtAPI.

2) The impact in EXT-API for Frankfurt is only minimal impact, the resource has been identified and will be committed.



Wipro, 

Amdocs,

China Mobile, Huawei, Tencent,

AT&T,

Verizon

 Mar 4th, 2020:

  • Code in all impacted modules has been submitted.
  • Documentation has been submitted.
  • Ready for integration test.








Jan 15, 2020: SO, EXT-API, UUI and OOF are on track for the agreed scope, with respect to all aspects - APIs, functionality implementation, as well as resource commitments.

Remove Python2 dependencies

David McBrideRANK #1

See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki except Stretch goals for SDC, VNFSDK to complete all in R6.

Logging not committed for R6.

YES


Exceptions:

  • Uncommitted projects
  • DCAEGEN Cloudify
  • SDC
YES

All projects committed for the Frankfurt are OK except SDC and Multicloud Azure

YES

All projects committed for the Frankfurt are OK except SDC and Multicloud Azure

GO



MALL projects using Python




K8s CDS Support

RANK #3

MultiCloud commitment confirmed



YES


YES

YES

Integration with CDS

Change Management Frankfurt Extensions


S-M

MULTICLOUD: C

CDS: C

Integration: C

SO: TO

SDC: TO

CDS commited by Orange and Samsung

MULTICLOUD commited by Samsung, Orange and Intel

Integration commited by Samsung, Orange and Intel 


Orange

Samsung

Intel

Implementation inside ONAP components completed. Documentation and demonstration scripts still must be improved. First tests completed on integration lab of Samsung
K8s HPA Support

RANK #3

YES

YES

Move to R7




Extending HPA for K8S

Multicloud K8s

S

MULTICLOUD: C

OOF:TO

Policy:TO

AAI/ESR:TO

SO: TO

SDC: TO

Intel commits to coding in Multicloud and testing in OOF, Policy, AAI, SO, SDC

Intel

Moving this to POC - may not be done by R6 timeframe. 



 K8s Security and traffic  controller

 

RANK #3

commitment from MultiCloud confirmed

YES

YES





 Multicloud K8sS - MMULTICLOUD: C

Intel commits to coding/testing in Multicloud




 Intel
VSP Compliance and Validation Check within SDC  - Phase 2


RANK #2

YES

YES

YES

GO

Track as #19 on Frankfurt Release Integration Testing Status

VSP Compliance and Validation Check within SDC

SDC: C

([Prabhu]: SDC PTL reviewed the design and Vodafone  already committed the code in SDC and code review is in progress)


Prabhu BalanVodafone
OVP Testing and Certification Support Within SDC

RANK #3

YES

the feature cannot be delivered in Frankfurt because of lack of resources in 2020 to complete integration testing






OVP Testing and Certification Support Within SDC (Frankfurt)

SDC - C

VTP - C

SDC-iconectiv

VTP-iconectiv



iconectiv


SECCOM Code coverage

RANK #3

See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki

YES

Waiting for a feedback from PTLs - Jira tickets were opened to all projects. Preliminary feedback is on track.

Track

131/155 repos above 50% code coverage. Discrepancies in coverage between Sonar and SonarCloud. Expect coverage to improve by RC0.

YES due to agreement that this req to be completed by RC0

Projects with waivers

  • AAF (aaf-authz, Sidecar fproxy, Sidecar rproxy)
  • Policy (policy-engine)
  • Multicloud (multicloud-azure)
  • OOF (optf-cmso)

GO





All projects




SECCOM Containers configured per secure recommendation

RANK #3

YES

Continuing to follow up with PTLs.  Will be gated by health check.  Recommend approval.

Track

Following up with PTLs. Some questions about the requirements in Chap.5 of the CIS Docker Benchmarks.

YES

GO


All projects using containers




SECCOM Java 11 migration from v8

RANK #3

See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki.

YES

YELLOWWaiting for a feedback from some PTLs - Jira tickets were opened to all projects. Preliminary feedback is on track.

See REQ-219 for project status

Discuss on PTL call

YELLOW

Although majority of project plans to upgrade java in Guilin release, some of them already migrated in Frankfurt.

YES

Although majority of project plans to upgrade java in Guilin release, some of them already migrated in Frankfurt.

GO


All projects using java




SECCOM CII badging – meet targeted Silver and Gold requirements

RANK #3

YES

There has been no movement by the projects on the CII requirements for Frankfurt.

Discuss on PTL call

YES

Some projects have moved their CII answers to "Met" for the CII questions being focused on. More have indicated that they will do so in Guilin.

De-scoped by TSC on 5/28/20

Create new req for Guilin

Deferred to RC2

Documentation only. No dependencies.

Descoping requirement Frankfurt and moving to Guilin based on new SECCOM work effort.




All projects




SECCOM Complete the OJSI backlog

RANK #3

excluding Logging

Logging has open OJSI tickets but has been descoped from the release.

Some of the tickets may not be closed easily but most of the most severe tickets is being worked on.

YES

Not all of the tickets can be easily resolved due to AAF integration issues (i.e. in SO) but apart from that most of severe ticketes should be resolved till end of the release

YES

Not all projects completed their OJSI backlog yet. All the details can be found in the Jira ticket (see open tickets that are blocking this requirement)

See notes in March 12 TSC meeting agenda on compromise

YES


All OJSI tickets apart from 3 has been completed. SECCOM recommends to grant a waiver for 3 left OJSI tickets

GO


All relevant projects having an entry in OJSI




SECCOM HTTPS communication vs. HTTP

RANK #1

except for Music (partial) and Holmes/Logging - no part of the release.

See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki.

YES

Some projects tends to have issues with AAF integration to provide certificate but seems to be doable if issues in AAF are resolved

YES

17 HTTP ports still open. Detailed list can be provided by Morgan Richomme as he has the results that are updated every day

YES

Only

30476
(music-tomcat)
left


Recommend approval


All relevant projects still using http communication instead of https




SECCOM Password removal from OOM HELM charts

RANK #1



YES

The amount of work is increasing as we discovered encrypted passwords and other cases where change in the components is required and we don't have the competency to make all of them (java script). We ask for help in some of the projects (only on the code part, OOM changes can be done on time)

YES

Scope limited to mariadb-galera and components using mariadb-galera common chart or common instance. Most components ready/in-review components left:

so - WIP

policy - WIP

CDS - merged

YES

All related patches merged. No more "secretpassword" for mariadb-galera.

GO


All relevant projects




SECCOM Communication Matrix

RANK #3

DCAE will be the 'prototype' project/pilot with this release. Lesson Learnt will be shared to other projects.

YES - DCAE only

AS agreed first focus on external communication.

YES

Data collection for an external communication with scripts and support from DCAE. We propose to close it for Frankfurt with a note to continue the work in Guilin release.

YES

GO


All relevant projects




SECCOM Containers and Kubernetes secure configuration recommendation

RANK #3

YES

Waiting for feedback from the Integration team

YES

Waiting for Integration team blocking K8S test results.

YES

GO


All projects




SECCOM Coverity integration by end of Frankfurt

RANK #3

YES

Waiting for an update from fd.io on their experience as Artem is not available  for this task.

Move to Guilin release.








All projects using containers




SECCOM Ingress controller

RANK #3


YES

Ingress is already configured for most of the components. Not all may be working properli (UI) but they all will be available through ingress

YES

All components accessible through ingress (nginx).

YES

GO


All projects




SECCOM Secure communication for 5G – AAF contribution – CMPv2 protocol trial usage 

Hampus Tjäder

RANK #3

Please remove this requirement, it is a duplicate of

Need to understand why it is yellow








AAF + TBC




SECCOM Perform Software Composition Analysis - Vulnerability tables

RANK #1

except for Holmes/CLI and Logging - not part of R6 release

See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki.

YES

Waiting for a feedback from PTLs.

Script to automatically generate tickets is working.

Track

OBE - de-scope








All projects




Document current upgrade component strategy
David McBrideRANK #1

except for Holmes/ Logging - not part of R6 release

See feedbeck from PTL on the wiki.

YES

YES

This item should be completed by RC2. The following projects have not yet started this activity: APPC, CLAMP, Portal, Music, SO, VNFSDK, SDC

YES

De-scoped by TSC on 5/28/20

Will be done by contractor during 2H20

GO















(star) T-Shirt Size: Ballpark estimation for assessing the development/testing activities performed by the project team; not the integration team


POC / Experimentation

POC definition



SECCOM ISTIO POC – limited ONAP deployment scope​

TypeRequirementOwnerLink(s) to HLD/LLD if anyDependency (from/to) another project(s)T-Shirt Size (XS, S, M, L, XL) (star)Project's Impact: Test Only (TO), Code (C)Company EngagementNotesM4 Status




POC

SECCOM ISTIO POC – limited ONAP deployment scope












POCAcumos - DCAE Integration

MDCAE - C

AT&T

Orange (Integration/UC support)

Met withEric Debeau/Orange team on 10/25 and they commited to support.






POCSelf Service Control Loops


XL

CLAMP - C

DCAE - C

Policy - C

AT&T







POCMulticloud K8s Support (Continuation from R4) 





































(star)T-Shirt Size: Ballpark estimation for assessing the development/testing activities performed by the project team; not the integration team