Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Request from yan yan (CVC Committee) - Anuket Assured Re-Launch Release Plan to provide a go/no-go on their requirements / testing input to the badge launch.
  • CVC received the following feedback about ONAP CNF compliance - Is it correct?
    • H Release – ONAP CNF compliance requirements will be delivered by modeling subcommittee
    • I Release – ONAP CNF compliance tests implementation will be delivered by VTP (under VNFSDK)
  • Seshu Kumar Mudiganti  - Updates or requests from the XGVela project
    • Considering integration with 5G core slicing use case in ONAP.
    • Observability - Looking at VES and Prometheus.
    • In the process of finalizing the use case. More details to come soon.
    • XGVela does no plan to introduce new requirements to ONAP, at least not for Istanbul.
    • XGVela - CNF based
    • Requirements are driven by Anuket community

May 6th, 2021 at 1pm UTC

...

Action Items (In Progress)

  •  Catherine LefevreFollow-up with the Modeling Subcommittee about yan yanrequest Kenny Paul - Reach out to FB to meet us on May 12th, 2021 (ONAP For Enterprise Task Force) - request made to LF PM - just checked no name yet.
  •  Byung-Woo Jun: Bring the discussions to the ONAP Architecture Subcommittee about SO/SDNC role etc (see notes from 4/29)
  •  Byung-Woo Jun / Marian Darula - Provide the Ericsson packaging proposal.
  •  (Modeling/Requirements): Need to determine what ETSI CNF package solution we want to move forward (Fernando OliveiraByung-Woo Jun vs Thinh Nguyenphu)
  •  (Thinh Nguyenphu): Share an alternative (Common CNF Packaging) to what was proposed by Fernando Oliveira , Byung-Woo Jun
  •  (Olivier): Check with CNCF if any cross-meeting with ONAP could be scheduled 
  •  (All): Collect feedback about our current CNF onboarding capabilities from 3rd party vendors
  •  Kamel Idir - Will repeat onboarding with Honolulu (once he has the lab resources) and will report back

...

  •  (All) Try to identify where we are on the CNCF Trail Journey - Needs clarification to comment, need to dig into the details of the actual ask.
  •  (All): Build an ONAP proposition value to collaborate with XGVela Community
  •  (Timo): Ask the Nokia team to present preview material on 1/26
  •  (Catherine): Contact Policy/DCAE/AAI/SO PTLs to attend January 26th CNF Task Force call to review Satoshi FujiiCNF Closed Loop proposal
  •  (Catherine): Send Calendar invite - every Tuesday @2pm UTC
  •  (Catherine): Reconnect with the CNF sub-Task force: Modeling/AAI (Andy Mayer) and ETSI (Byung-Woo Jun and Fernando Oliveira ) to understand their 2021 goals on January 19th 
  •  (Kenny): Follow up with EUAG in order to determine if any particular CNF reqs (or 2021 ONAP requirements including an update to the ONAP TSC)
  •  (Seshu/Lukasz): Invite EMCO representatives
  •  (Olivier): Organise a call with Trevor Lovettand any interested CNF team members to determine how ONAP could contribute to the OVP 2021 activities
  •  (Ranny): Post the topic for the event
  •  (Catherine) Check with Olivier Smithif we can postpone OVP/ONAP discussion to another week so CNF PDN Gateway discussions can be scheduled on  March 2nd, 2021
  •  (Victor MoralesRanny Haiby): Setup additional follow-ups about CNF PDN Gateway
  •  (Timo/Catherine): Promote 2021 goals from OVP program and collect any particular requirement through ONAP Requirement and TSC meetings
  •  (Kenny): Contact EUAG about any CNF badging requirement (OVP)
  •  (Seshu): Check if user-67d6f , Lei Huang , Yan Yang can join March 9th, 2021 to discuss about OVP/ONAP & VNFSDK
  •  (Thinh): Share the ETSI event link when it will be available
  •  (Seshu): Questions for XGVela

It would be great to highlight more clearly the purpose of XGVela as a platform to build CNFs and get feedback from 3rd party vendors, who are today already creating CNFS for carriers, to assess the value proposition

After the CNF is created via XGVela – can we then deploy the CNF on any Cloud environment without using XGVela at run-time?

If we need XGVela then have we performed an analysis to demonstrate the value proposition vs K8S and its ecosystem?

Build a slide to highlight how XGVela (i.e. create  CNF) is complementary to ONAP (onboard CNF/orchestrate CNF, etc.) and how it will fit to the CNCF Landscape