Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Raw Material (Presentations)

ONE-Summit_Cloud_Native_Service_Orchestration_ONAP v0.4.pptx

2021-06-08 - ONAP TSC Taskforce: Cloud Native (Demos)

2021-06-09 - ONAP TSC Taskforce: Cloud Native (Roadmap)

2021-06-10 - ONAP TSC Task Force: Cloud Native (Ask Us Anything)

Table of contents:

Table of Contents

...

Recording from June 2021 DDF


5. FAQ

Link to raw material - 2021-06-DD - ONAP TSC Task Force: Cloud Native (Ask Us Anything)

...

Q: What is the value-add of ONAP for CNF orchestration (CNFO)? What does it provide on top of K8S?

A:

  • hybrid config and data operations can work on both K8s and PNFs 
  • Can manage helm charts
  • Handling multi-cluster deployment on top of K8S
  • ONAP works in the service level, not just the resource level 
  • Still need to address coordination across different clusters and SW upgrades

Q: What can end users do with ONAP Honolulu? What operations are supported (service design? Deployment? Day-0 configuration? Day 1/2 configuration? LCM?), and what will be supported in Istanbul?

A:

  • For the "native helm" path - on-boarding, Helm enrichment with CDS, meaning modifying values in Helm templates.
  • Day 2 operation config-assign/config-deploy - add/modify resources after the initial deployment, which may be used for upgrade.
  • CNF status checking is supported in Honolulu, will be enhanced in Istanbul.
  • SO merged the "native helm" and "ETSI" paths for a more 'Plug&Play'

Q: What is the format of CNF packaging? Is it based on Helm? Does it follow ETSI-NFV specifications?

A: 

  • packaging - SOL04 may need a bit of work still. Descriptors are still being discussed in ETSI about containerized models. Lots of discussion but no consensus yet.  Orchestration meetings on Mondays 8am Eastern
  • Packaging is based on the CSAR format (for both the 'helm native' and 'ETSI' Format
  • CNF Descriptor Proposal page:  https://wiki.onap.org/x/VwsqBg 
  • Magma CNF onboarding is following similar path than what we have implemented for CNF vFW

Q: Where is the documentation for CNF on-boarding and deployment? 

A:

Q: How should end users report issues 

A:

Q: Are there "CNF requirements" available in ONAP, similar to the "VNF Requirements"?

A:

  • Helm 3 is supported in Honolulu (maintenance release). Helm hooks are not fully supported.
  • CNF Descriptor Proposals: https://wiki.

...

Q: How could developers get involved? Where do you mostly need help? Are there open Jira tickets people can start working on?

A:

  • Call for developers to implement in Jakarta new features:
    • CNF Control Loop 
    • Integration with XGVela
    • Merging Native Helm/ETSI flows
    • Entreprise use cases
    • etc
  • Istanbul CNF Orchestrator Requirements:  Image AddedREQ-627 - ONAP CNF orchestration - Istanbul Enhancements DONE
  • Those are the short term goals. Have a great deal more in the backlog for future released. refer to 2021-06-09 - ONAP TSC Taskforce: Cloud Native (Roadmap)

Q: What it is not supported today and is part of the roadmap?

A:

Q: What do we need to ask to CNF Vendors to be onboarded on the ONAP Platform?

A:

Q: What has changed in CNF packaging since Frankfurt?

A:

  • In Frankfurt, the Helm chart was a 'second class citizen' in SDC. In Honolulu there is native support for Helm charts. SO understands Helm type now.

Q: Is there a plan to support NETCONF configuration, or will the solution be limited to CDS CBAs? Is there alignment with C&PS?

A:

  • No integration with C&PS, but it may happen at a later stage. But this is a good approach and may be discussed further in the CNF Taskforce.

Recent Presentation Material:

ONE-Summit_Cloud_Native_Service_Orchestration_ONAP v0.4.pptx

2021-06-08 - ONAP TSC Taskforce: Cloud Native (Demos)

2021-06-09 - ONAP TSC Taskforce: Cloud Native (Roadmap)

2021-06-10 - ONAP TSC Task Force: Cloud Native (Ask Us Anything)/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=56066622