...
Muddasar's Proposed format for above process. Some actions have been rearranged. An unmaintained project must provide User Docs, SW and release notes. The unmaintained project must also go thru quality assurance process to discover new vulnerabilities that can help improve release notes or a decision to remove the project from release (archived)
...
numberOfFixedRows | 1 |
---|---|
numberOfFixedColumns | 1 |
Sequence | Action | R | A | C | I | Artifact | Tool/process |
1 | Final call to the ONAP Community raised by the PTL or by the TSC. (Negative Result for volunteer for succession) | TSC | TSC | PTLs | ArcSubComm SECCOM | JIRA EPIC(new) Ticket ( highest priority/severity) | JIRA Ticket |
2 | Review what is used by the Community and the dependencies to other components and maintain the repositories that are necessary for the ONAP Components | ArcSubComm | TSC | PTLs, SECCOM | PTLs | JIRA EPIC-Tasks per project-New (Projects Dependency List) | JIRA, Nexus, PTL Assigned task updates, Weekly status on TSC Meeting |
Verify what (if any) impact the change has on OOM/Integration (CIST)/DOC projects and ensure that is communicated | ArcSubComm | TSC | PTLs, SECCOM, DOC | PTLs | JIRA Task update, impact assessment report | JIRA, Weekly status on TSC Meeting | |
3 | Identify an alternative path (if any) | ArcSubComm | TSC | PTLs | ArcSubComm, SECCOM | JIRA Task update, | Weekly status on TSC Meeting |
4 | Identify potential remaining committers to maintain the remaining repositories | TSC | TSC | PTLs | ArcSubComm, SECCOM | Info.yaml to look up, JIRA | TSC delegation, JIRA, Gerrit Repo. |
5 | Decision to retire functionality made | TSC | TSC | Arc, Sec, PTLs | JIRA update | JIRA | |
6 | Update INFO.yaml | LFN IT | JIRA task | PTL, Commiter, Super Committer, Pam, LF-IT | |||
7 | In gerrit set the appropriate repositories that are no longer in use to 'Read Only' access | LF-IT? | |||||
8 | Update the Architecture diagrams and references (Need role assignment) | ||||||
9 | Remove Jenkins jobs (I think Code scanning and report generation needs to continue until closed and archived) | LF-IT? | |||||
10 | Inform Steven Winslow ( we should create alias as functions may be served by new staff) (LFN IP Legal) and disable all the scans (Sonar, FOSSology, NexusIQ) on the unmaintained repos (I think Code scanning and report generation needs to continue until closed and archived) | Pgm | TSC | PTLs | ArcSubComm, SECCOM | ||
11 | Move the project to Unmaintained State Projects including Clean-up of other wiki pages, RDT, JIRA, mailing lists, calendars, etc.(Need role assignment, tis may be multiple actions executed by multiple entities) | ||||||
12 | Indicate in the release note that the project is in Unmaintained state i.e. add a hint in the header. | DOC | |||||
13 | The project information for this component will no more be branched (i.e. master) and will be linked to the latest maintained release. (how would it impact CI tools?) | LF-IT, Integration, Release Mgt | |||||
14 | Any critical, severe or high vulnerability found in the code written by the project team MUST be fixed within 60 days or prior to the inclusion of the project in a new release, whichever occurs first. (This can not be done due to lack of resources. Can this be mentioned in the Release notes? if yes, who owns the risk? TSC?, SECCOM?) |
Tableenhancer | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
Transition from "Unmaintained" to "Incubation/Mature": A Unmaintained project can be moved to “Incubation” or “Mature" if there is a new interest from the ONAP Community and meeting the requirement for the project state while performing a project review, including PTL responsibility and committers engagement. The following steps will be re-initiatied
...