Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Interoperability  

    • SDO specifications supported: 
    • APIs/Interfaces:
      • http/https northbound towards web browser
    • Information/data models:
      • Relies on customer data from keycloak
      • Current approach is to work dataless except for caching southbound requests
    • If there is an existing ONAP project that does something similar to this project explain why this being a new stand-alone project?
      • ONAP project is unmaintained. Telekom has a portal it uses internally and would like to donate parts of it's code


  • Other Dependencies

    • Upstream open source projects: 
      • Keycloak 
    • Non ONAP APIs/Interfaces:
      • KeyCloak
    • Specific IDE integration requirements:
      • None
    • Integration Testing: 
      • TBD and aligned with existing ONAP processes. Extensive E2E tests for DT use cases existing but not yet stripped down for smaller feature set
    • etc.

Community Alignment:

  • Vendor Neutrality:
    • The PortalNG does not include any vendor specific code nor require any vendor specific integrations (e.g. Element Manager)
  • Seed code Location (if any):
    • In-House
  • If "In-House" please answer the the following questions:
    • Code is ready to be uploaded
      • Theoretically yes
    • Approved by project leadership team
      • approval from DT open source responsible available, approval from DT
      XXX
      • project lead available
    • All proprietary trademarks, logos, product names and internal company secrets were removed
      • yes
  • No waivers to ONAP policies (including IPR) are required by this project.

    TODO
  • Plan for providing education to onboard the ONAP developer community : Currently no plan available for this.

    TODO

...