Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

#

Assumption

Notes

1

"fields" and "scope" are proprietary options or not in the scope of this analysis.


2



The Big(ger) Picture

Gliffy Diagram
macroId5966a68a-1641-430a-8c78-27c938f06e15
displayNameCm Handle Batch Interface Design
nameCm Handle Batch Interface Design
pagePin8

Issues & Decisions

#

Issue

Notes 

Decision

1Which operation(s) need support for multiple cm handles?
  1. Get
  2. Create
  3. Update (Put)
  4. Patch
  5. Delete

if many what is the priority?


2

Do we need to use same xpath (resourceIdentifierInQuery) for all cm handles or different for each cm handle ?




3

Which datasources ?

Do we need to support passthrough-only no-cached() data only ?

or, alternatively, support operational/running (cached) data too ?


4
Endpoint url patterns?

Existing : /v1/ch/{cm-handle}/data/ds/{datastore-name}

CPS Propossed : /v1/batch/data/ds/{datastore-name}

      ( include cm handles into payload / body and leave datastore into url)



keep datastore, topic and optional parameters in the URL itself instead into body.

CPS prefers keep interface similar as single cm handle interface (consistency and cost)

Existing : ...&topic=topicParamInQuery


3

Impacts on DMI Plugin Interfaces

    1. support in ONAP DMI-plugin


4

How we are supporting multiple anchors into CPS-Core ?

    1. Java Interface (depend on 2.1) or,
    2. REST Interface


5

Response always Async ie. topic is compulsory ?

    1. Reuse existing topic


...