...
| Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
|---|---|
| Target Release Name | Enter the name of the release you are targeting to deliverBeijing Release |
| Project Lifecycle State | Either Incubation, Core, Mature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information |
| Participating Company List | the company participating in this release. At least 3-4 organizations, including an operator are recommended.AT&T, Intel, Tech Mahindra |
Scope
What is this release trying to address?
...
The Beijing Release will be focusing on Platform Maturity as a priority. Additional LCM actions will be added to the scope of APIs supported. These additional LCM actions have already been developed and validated by AT&T and will be contributed to ONAP.
More specifically, APPC will focus on the following areas in Beijing.
- Remove references and use of openecomp and replace with onap
- Address S3P requirements to the extent possible to comply with minimum requirements requested for Beijing for areas not already at this level.
- Notes:
- Compliancy for Performance Level 1 is still being investigated
- Compliancy for Stability is assumed to be addressed by Integration team system level testing
- Resiliency -
- Local HA: this is a function of ODL clustering capability, so whatever is supported by ODL Nitrogen defines local HA capabilities
- Geo-red: manual site failover only will be supported in Beijing
- Notes:
- Support AAF (Authentication and Authorization Framework) for API access
- Upgrade ODL version to Nitrogen (driven by CCSDK dependency)
- Replace MySQL with MariaDB (driven by CCSDK dependency)
- Increase Code Coverage to 50%
- Provide support for the following new LCM actions:
- Following Actions in support of In-place software upgrade
- QuiesceTraffic
- ResumeTraffic
- UpgradeSoftware
- UpgradePreCheck
- UpgradePostCheck
- UpgradeBackup
- UpgradeBackout
- Following Actions in support of In-place software upgrade
Use Cases
Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer use case).
...
API this project is delivering to other projects.
| API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| To fill out | High level description of the API | Date for which the API is reviewed and agreed | To fill out | Link toward the detailed API description |
Third Party Products Dependencies
...