Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. The concept of participant replicas into ACM-R and the Participant Intermediary
  2. A lightweight mechanism for replica update between replicas and ACM-R. Every time a replica changes its data, the change is reported to ACM-R and ACM-R updates all other replicas for that participant

The diagram above depicts data management as implemented today in ACM-R. ACM-R maintains the "source of truth" for all compositions and their elements in the ACM-R database.

  1. Composition type data is pushed from ACM-R to the participants and is read-only in the participants
  2. Composition element data (state information mainly) is built up by interactinos between ACM-R and participants for the various ACM operations (Deploy/Update/Undeploy etc) and ACM-R always maintains the current composition element data in the ACM-R database
  3. Composition element properties are pushed by ACM-R to the participant and can be updated in the participant by the participant implementation. When the properties are updated on the participant side, those changes are propagated to the ACM-R database

Therefore today, for the three types of data above, the ACM-R database has the state of the participant. This means that creation of participant replicas is rather trivial. We

In this solution:

  1. Participant Design backward compatibility is preserved, there is no change to the participant intermediary interface for participant implementations
  2. Participant Configuration Backward compatibility is preserved, apart from a new "replicas" parameter (optional, default is 1), there is no change to participant configuration
  3. ACM-R introduces a new REST API for replica management
  4. ACM-R is made HA so that it itself can scale

...