Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

...

  • Sprint 1 Status
    • Security update
      • APPC-405 - Takamune Cho
        • Action: Need to open stories for area that are "unmet"
        • Taka will update the story with the list of the gaps identified
    • Code Coverage
    • Resiliency
    • ScaleOut
      • APPC-532 - Ramya Balaji
        • Can be moved to Delivered; code unit tested, junits added - story can be closed
      • APPC-479 - Vidjya Nerella

        • Move to Sprint 2; need additional time..
        • Another item will be added to Sprint 1 due to new requirements added by Paul: Vidhya to send details.
    • Stability-72hr soak

      • APPC-484Scott Seabolt

        • this has been prep for testing
        • Environment , clients, jmeter, all loaded
        • Investigation on metrics completed to define what we need to collect
        • Footprint for test defined; Sprint 2 will be to focus on writing the test
        • Aaron can help support these activities; he has a stable Amsterdam env to try things out on first
    • Documentation

    • Platform Hardening

      • APPC-307Takamune Cho

        • Move  out of Sprint 1, need to make decision about wanting to support Rebuilt via APPC provider - Check with Paul on direction.
      • APPC-292 - Patrick Brady

        • Submitted, needs to be merged
      • APPC-254 - Sonar story - many open sub-task

    • Logging

  • ODL & DB upgrade - Send CCSDK PTL request for status on Sprint 1 - sprint shows to be done on 2/3; however, many issues still showing open
    • Input from Dan Timoney is that ODL is not complete yet, he is targeting end of week
    • No update yet on MariaDB.
    • This will deplay our plans to complete these two items in Sprint 2. If CCSDK provides Nitrogen end of week, we can get ODL upgrade done in Sprint 2. For now, will leave both in Sprint 2 until we get further updates.
  • AAF dependency
    • Review with Sai Gandham planned for 2/8
    • Initial target for AAF-91 communicated was mid-Feb; will confirm tomorrow if this is still the plan
  • CDT
    • License scan needs to be done first before submitting seed code
  • ScaleOut
    • Multiple meetings have happened today to clarify requirements with SDC, VID, SO, and AAI.
    • It has been a challenge getting all needed participants to these calls due to timezones and VF2F meetings this week.
    • Still need further clarification from SDC on what identifier we can use to uniquely identify a VFModule so that we can associate the correct scale out template.

02/07/18 - Scale Out dependency

...

and cross product coordination

Participants: Scott Seabolt, Takamune Cho, James Forsyth, Lauren Lewis, Ofir Sonsino, Randa Maher, Scott Blandford, Paul Miller, Prabhuram Somasundaram, Dan Timoney, Seshu Kumar Mudiganti, Christina Monteleone

...

  • Decision: VID will provide Controller Type Property to SO so that SO can post request to correct DMaaP topic; this should be configurable. VID & SO will work together to flesh out the details.
  • Assumption is that user creating the scaleout request will know which controller needs to handle the request to scaleout.
  • Seshu will follow-up to determine out SO uses the APPC Client library and get back to us if additional discussions are needed.
  • Action: Another meeting is needed to since SDC representative was not able to make meeting. Follow-up sessionwill be planned for Monday, 2/12.
    • Open issue: What identifier can APPC use that uniquiely identifies the VfModule and does not change with environment.
      • Update: vfModuleModelName is proposed. See notes below.

02/12/18 - Scale Out dependency

...

and cross product coordination - Continued

Participants: Takamune Cho, Vidya Jog, Paul Miller, Scott Seabolt, Lior NachmiasSteve SmokowskiScott BlandfordLauren LewisMichael LandoDan Timoney, Prabhuram Somasundaram, David Ho, Shailendra Borale, Michael Zinnikas

...

  • Steve Smokowski had some concerns around doing throw-away work to support multiple controllers; ideally, the model should define which controller manages a given VNF and that should be information that is part of the onboarding process for any VNF. However, we are not at that level of maturity yet and the issue extends beyond scale out scenario. The question is what is doable in Beijing, which is why using VID was the interim solution proposed. Some more discussion will take place on this topic. 

02/13/18 - Scale Out dependency

...

and cross product coordination - VID to SO Controller Type- round 2

Participants: Takamune Cho, Vidya Jog, Paul Miller, Scott Seabolt, Scott BlandfordLauren LewisMichael LandoDan Timoney, Prabhuram Somasundaram, Ofir Sonsino

...

  • Need to follow-up with SDC again on their plans to move to onap from openecomp; we still have not gotten feedback on timeline for this dependency yet. Takamune Cho to follow-up with SDC,
  • Sai Gandham to schedule meeting with APPC team to review his design plans for AAF-91.
    • Update: Meeting moved to this Thurs, 2/8/18

...