NOTE: Moved it to Casablanca, See SO Monitoring Feature Design for further development/implementation
- A design idea
- Why not Camunda Cockpit as is: current Camunda Cockpit was designed from a BPMN process management perspective (note: need to study for TOSCA cases).
- It does not meet service-level orchestration monitoring.
- It is designed for BPMN definition/execution monitoring; require process knowledge for monitoring.
- We need higher-level monitoring abstraction for both BPMN and TOSCA.
- Associate Service Instance Id (or other keys) to the top-level process instance id. For the association,
- Could use a process variable holding the Service Instance id (or other keys), or
- Could use a database holding the association
- Allow VID, UUI or external apps monitor process workflow process (graphically and text-based) based on extensible search keys.
- We need a platform level runtime and history process activity report capabilties out of the box.
- Regardless use of Camunda Enterprise Edition or Community Edition.
- Query to Camunda/ARIA database to extract activities.
- The following diagram depicts the high-level concept.
- Why not Camunda Cockpit as is: current Camunda Cockpit was designed from a BPMN process management perspective (note: need to study for TOSCA cases).
...