Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Meeting Attendees

  1. Chris Donley
  2. Brian Hedstrom
  3. Kailun Qin
  4. user-67d6f
  5. Bryan Whittle
  6. steven stark
  7. Trevor Lovett
  8. @acm?
  9. Alexander Vul
  10. Lianhao Lu
  11. Moshe Hoadley
  12. Tina Tsou
  13. Weitao Gao
  14. Steven Wright
  15. Xiaohua Zhang
  16. Thinh Nguyenphu

Meeting Agenda & Minutes

Review open action items from last week

Agenda ItemsNotes

Logistics

PTL election


VNFReqs (Steven W)

Steven presented their readthedocs area which includes 5 main artifacts. Alex raised the concern about VNFRQTS specifying behavioral requirements versus interface requirements. There are static testing procedures for a VNF Package (e.g., via inspection).

Thinh will prepare slides for next week's meeting on ETSI NFV package requirements. This topic generated a lot of discussion and needs further discussion. Should VNFRQTS be specifying RFP type requirements and define tests to validate those type of requirements? Or should it only focus on those requirements need for a VNF to operate within the ONAP platform?

VNF SDK architecture (Victor/Kanagaraj)

user-67d6f presented a slide deck on VNF Testing Framework including objectives and pitfalls of existing frameworks. There were many questions from Moshe, as well as Alex and Brian on the presentation. The presentation needs additional clarification. Discussion was cut off as we went over.

Status and JIRA review

Not discussed

Any new business?

NoneCode reviews are dragging on for a long time (Moshe)


Meeting Recording

    • Video Recording:
    • Audio Only Recording:
    • Slides: 

Action Items

  •   Chris Donley will follow up with SDC on SOL004 support and VNFRQTS
  •  Thinh Nguyenphu will prepare a presentation for VNF SDK meeting on ETSI NFV package requirements
  •   Chris Donley will find additional CSAR examples
  •   
  • post slide contributions from today's meeting

Meeting Contributions

  •