Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand
titleMEF Interlude Scope

Referring to MEF55 document the Interlude reference point is used by Service Orchestration Functionality to request initiation of technical operations or dynamic control behavior associated with a Service with a partner network domain. The dynamic control (Service Control Orchestration) behavior is elaborated in section 8.2.3 of MEF55 as

  • Scheduling, assigning and coordinating service control related activities;
  • Undertaking necessary tracking of the execution process of service control requests;
  • Adding additional information to an existing service control request under execution;
  • Modifying information in an existing service control request under execution;
  • Modifying the service control request status, and indicating completion of a service control request;
  • Canceling a service control request; - Monitoring the jeopardy status of service control requests, and escalating service control requests as necessary;
  • Instantiating, when appropriate, an event for the billing system to capture the policy-constrained change.

MEF55 also differentiates Order Fulfillment Orchestration, Service Configuration and Activation, Service Control Orchestration. While Order Fulfillment Orchestration deals with establishing or modifying a service through the ordering process, Service Control permits the service to be dynamically changed within specific bounds described in policies that are established at the time of ordering. After a service is provisioned and established, LSO may enable Service Control to Customers/parties, such as the ability to modify attributes subject to schedule policies and service constraint policies with for example specified ranges of valid values. Service Control relates to capabilities such as turning on or off connections, throttling bandwidth or other QoS characteristics, etc.

So considering the scope in MEF55, Interlude reference point is primarily used for Service Control Orchestration. The interactions factored in the MEF Interlude Reference point are as follows

  • Service Provider controls aspects of the Service within the Partner domain (on behalf of the Customer) by requesting changes to dynamic parameters as permitted by service policies.
  • Service Provider queries the operational state of the Service.
  • Service Provider requests change to the administrative state of a service or service component (e.g. Service Interface)
  • Service Provider requests update to defaulted service parameters which are allowed to be customized (policy-controlled)
  • Service Provider requests the creation of connectivity between two Service Interfaces as permitted by established business arrangement.
  • Service Provider provider queries the Partner's Service Inventory for services provided by the Partner to the Service Provider.
  • Service Provider receives Service specific event notifications from the Partner.
  • Service Provider receives Service specific performance information from the Partner.
  • Service Provider requests test initiation and receive test results from the Partner.

The green one'sare interactions currently supported in External API as part of the CCVPN use case. In addition to the above listed capabilities (in green) already supported by Ext-API , there are two other capabilities

-Service Provider Queries the Service Catalogue for the offered Services by Partner [via Ext-API Service Catalogue API, Not an expected Interlude capability]
-Service Provider places Service Order for a Service offered by Partner[Not specifically Interlude Capability as per MEF Interlude]
-Service Provider queries operational state of the Service. [via Ext-API Service Inventory API]


Expand
titleRelevant SDO and Opensource Work

Standardization Work

Characteristic

ETSI

MEF

TMF

NGMN

ONF

IETF

Use Case

NFVIaaS

Access E-Line + MEF-62 (May 2018)

NaaS

5G Slicing

Inter Cluster ONOS Network Application (Collaboration withONOS)

Mainly transport network traffic engineering based on the multi-domain path computation

Focus Area

Federation across MANO (virtualization domain) and ZSM Management Domains

Service Orchestration Function Federation – Focus on Service Layer

ODA : Autonomic Management interoperability across AD or Operational Domain interoperability – Focus on Service Layer

Slicing Management function interoperability, resource, and service Layer interoperability

•Cross Stratum Orchestration –  end-to-end orchestration, abstraction and resource optimization across different SDN Controllers serving specific domains.
•ONF/ OIF: Multi-Domain Control as part of TAPI

ACTN (Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks ): Coordination of network resources across multiple independent networks, multiple technology layers, SDN & Non-SDN, Network abstraction, Network Slicing

Scope

Interaction between MANO instances in different administrative domains  , interaction across management domain in ZSM

Interaction between SOF function between operator and partner domains in LSO architecture

Interaction between Operational Domains  through TMF Open API, Interaction between autonomic management functions

Interoperability between Slice management functions , service and resource layers

Orchestration of connectivity service that includes resources from several different domains, Coordinate service activation , monitor ongoing service

Multi-domain coordination, Network abstraction, Customer request mapping, virtual service coordination

Standard Interfaces/Reference points

Define a new Or-Or interface for inter orchestrator federation

MEF Interlude Reference point

Open API for inter-domain interaction – specifically TMF 641, 640, 645, 656, 653, 677, 633

None

Cross Stratum Orchestration CPI interface between CSO Controller and Domain Controller – TAPI


MPI – Interface between Multi-domain network controller and provisioning network controller – use NetConf Yang

Relevance in ONAP

Interaction between NFVOs across Administrative domains assumingCatalogueis synchronized – ETSI Os-Ma or Or-Or interface

Interaction between SOF (ONAP Ext-API + SO) in two administrative domains through TMF APIs

Mostly Open API for interaction across Administrative Domains

General vision on Slicing across multiple domains

View on interaction between Orchestration and Controller functions across administrative domains. Use of Yang Models and TAPI

View on the interaction between Controllers in multiple administrative domains. May not be relevant for Ext-API but may be useful for ONAP in general

Opensource (including ONAP) Work

Characteristic

OSM

ONAP

5GEx

Use Case

No specific use case

CCVPN

Many (NFVIaaS, VNFaaS, SlicingaaS etc)

Focus Area

Interoperability between functional blocks across different domains

Federation across two operators ONAP instances for Service instantiation enabled through Ext-API

Federation in a multi-domain multi-layer orchestration scenario

Scope

Interoperability between federated Functional blocks at different layers – i.e SO and RO, SO and SO etc.

Interoperability between Orchestration function and Ext-API across operator domains

Covers federation across multiple layers including business, orchestration and resource layers

Standard Interfaces/Reference points

No standard interfaces, but SO expose SOL005 interfaces as of Release 3

TMF 641 exposed by Ext-API

At NFVO layer 5GEx suggests the ETSI MANO specific interfaces, At RO layer, suggests NetConf/Yang

...