Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Expand
titleOpen Questions


Operator/EUAG

  • Do we need to consider intraoperator multi-administrative domain interaction – i.e communication across different instances of domain orchestrators (ONAP or non-ONAP) belonging to the same operator?
  • Do we need to limit the scope of Interlude to Service Control, Activation, and Configuration or include Service Order Management?
  • Use Cases: What use cases we should consider for the interlude specification? Generic Operational use cases (Service activation, query etc)  or Specific Business use case ? (NaaS, NFaaS, Access E-Line etc) – Short term and Long Term Target?
  • Consideration for interaction between ONAP and non-ONAP (Legacy) Management system across operator domains
  • Strategy for closed-loop control (Assurance) – Who will manage? Partner managed or SP managed
  • Resiliency requirements for inter-operator management connectivity – Failover mechanisms
  • Do we need to consider interdependency of Interlude and Legato/Sonata interface? (for example contract) 
  • Service Impact Assessment - Need for doing a Service impact analysis before any operation over interlude
  • Need for Service Change Management: Interlude operations to be initiated as work order through a Change management API (e.g. TMF 655) - Is this the practical mode of operation? Or expect a more dynamic service control operation ?
  • Dynamic or Static workflows to be supported to accommodate Interlude operations (SO and beyond)
  • Need for supporting ETSI Or-Or interface (ETSI SOL011) at Ext-API level or it can be supported as a component level (SO or VFC) east-west API

Architecture Subcommittee

    Onboarding and distribution model for SP and Partner Service Descriptors - Controlled by separate SDC instances or by common SDC instanCataloginstance
  • ogueCatalogue and Inventory Management – Strategy for 1) onboarding the catalog with service specification across interdomain boundaries 2) Reconciliation and aggregation of inventory at each domain – Pull vs Push model
  • ONAP specific terminology: Different SDOs follow different terminology e.g. operator interoperability, domain interoperability, administrative system interoperability etc.
  • Cross-layer interaction requirement and the need to accomodate this as part of interlude scope: for example OOF layer of SP need to interact with Multi-VIM of Partner for resource utilization, SDNC of partner sharing data to DCAE of SP (both not via Ext-API interlude but inter-component APIs) – Is this model valid (MLPOC as per ETSI IFA028 )
  • Federation vs Delegation
  • Federation actors and Roles : What type of provider roles we should consider ? Infrastructure provider, Connectivity SP, Partner SP, Master/Slave), Do we also need to consider different layers of partners – infrastructure, connectivity etc.
  • Need for including the Business layer interactions within the scope of interlude (for example dependency on Service Policy), Service Creation (in the absence of Business Application)
  • Separation of concerns : All external facing interactions to be managed via External-API, Should SO be Sservice Order aware ?
  • Need for supporting Or-Or interface over the interlude reference point

Modeling Subcommittee

  • Service Model Impact: Service hierarchy in the Service model – i.e Composite or Nested Service, Constituent Service – How the service model is decomposed and distributed to operator and partner domains? Any pattern to follow? Or based on request attributes?
  • Representation of Partner Service and Resources , Partner Registration data, Policy, Service associations between SP and Partner in Inventory
  • Use of Allotted Network Function vs SPPartner for representing Partner Service
  • Data Model Alignment for Ext-API : TMF vs MEF vs ONAP runtime model
  • SPPartner and ANF have similar functionality - Are they redundant ?

Security Subcommittee

  • Security mechanism to be established between parties - Recommendations and guidance
  • Regulatory guidance : What kind of regulatory checks to be incorporated

Project team input

  • SO: Plan for supporting Service configuration, Service change - What REST APIs to use PUT or PATCH of Service or a dedicated action
  • Policy: Representation of confguration policies for cross operator interaction, representation of constraints for scheduling operations on Interlude
  • SDC : Modelling and managing Partner services, service access points, distribution of service
  • A&AI : Representation of partner resources and services

...