...
- RANK #0 – Special GO - fully covered by involved companies
- RANK #1 – GO “Must Have”
- RANK #2 - GO “Continuity of previous releases”
- RANK #3 –GO if PTLs are OK since the impacted applications are less “stretched” i.e. CLAMP, Policy, DCAE etc.
- RANK #4 – NO GO – Mostly new requirements/features/projects
Use Cases
| Priority | M1 Scorecard | TSC M1 Approval | Use Case | Owner | Projects or functional requirements impacted for Dublin | Link(s) to HLD/LLD if any | Dependency (from/to) another project(s) | T-Shirt Size | Project's Impact: Test Only (TO), Code (C) | Committed (C)/ Partially Committed (P) or not (N) per impacted project | If Partially or not Committed, then what are the gaps per impacted project (people/FTEs; HLD/LLD; etc) | Company Engagement | Notes | M4 Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-regression 3-enhancements | vFW | Policy/(APPC) HPA | vFirewall Use Case Upgrade | XS | All: Test Only except Policy APPC(TO) | Policy: Committed | Policy: Committed | AT&T | ||||||
| 1 | vDNS | Integration Team | HPA | All: Test Only | N/A - part of regression tests | N/A - part of regression tests | ||||||||
| 1 | VoLTE | Integration Team | HPA | All: Test Only | N/A - part of regression tests | N/A - part of regression tests | ||||||||
| 1 | vCPE with or without TOSCA | Integration Team | HPA | All: Test Only | N/A - part of regression tests | N/A - part of regression tests | ||||||||
| 2 | CCVPN Use Case(Dublin) High priority:1, SD-WAN Multi-site to Multi-site service creation; 2, Service change: add or delete a site;3, close loop intelligent surveillance | SDC, SO, SDN-C,OOF,ExternalAPI, UUI, ESR,Modeling,MultiVIM/Cloud, VFC, Modeling, DCAE, Policy, Holmes, Consistent ID of a cloud region | CCVPN Use Case (Dublin) | AAI: M | AAI: TO DCAE: TO ExtAPI: TO? Multi-VIM: Test support | SDC: Partially committed based on Chinamobile/ZTE/Vodafone contribution SO: Committed based on the contributions from CMCC, ZTE and VDF for the main flows SDN-C/CCSDK : Committee based on contributions from Huawei and ZTE VF-C: Committed Modeling: Committed Usecase-UI: Committed Holmes Multi-VIM/Cloud: Committed based on VMware contribution Policy: Committed base on Huawei contribution | SDC: not enough resources | Dev/Test privided by Chinamobile, Vodafone, Huawei, ZTE, WindRiver, VMWare, Intel, Lenovo, ChinaTelecom, Fujitsu | ||||||
| 2 | 5G | SDC, SO, VNFSDK, AAI, DCAE, SDNC,CCSDK,VID, PORTAL, AAI/ESR, VFC,APPC, DMaaP, Policy | 5G Use Case | AAI: M | SDC: Committed based on Nokia/Ericsson/Amdocs contribution DCAE: Committed based on Ericsson contribution for 5G - Bulk PM (Casablanca carry-over items) and Wipro contribution on - 5G - OOF and PCI SO: Partial Committed based on the contributions from Nokia (to be confirmed) AAI: Partially committed CCSDK/SDN-C : Committed to Tosca ingest changes PORTAL: Partial committed VID: Partial committed Policy: Committed based on wipro contribution | SO: Resource commitment to be confirmed AAI: assuming schema/model changes only contributed by community. Also depends on AAI modelling SME availability PORTAL: Targets only the top menu integration required for 5G use case functions from VID and SDC/AAI VID: No enhancements dev | - Benjamin Cheung I added policy because my understanding from N.K. Shankaranarayanan there are additions for 5G - OOF and PCI | |||||||
| 0 | BBS | David Perez Caparros | DCAE, ExternalAPI, Modeling, SDNC, SO | BBS Broadband Service Use Case (Dublin) | PRH - 5G Use Case | AAI: TO DCAE: C ExtAPI: C SDC: TO SO (using 5G use case PNF discovery and re-registration): TO (to be confirmed) Policy: TO CLAMP: TO SDNC w/new DG: TO (to be confirmed) Modeling: design | DCAE: Committed based on contribution from Huawei, TechM and Nokia ExternalAPI: Committed SO: Committed based on the contributions from Nokia /Huawei? Modeling: contributions from Swisscom/Huawei/Nokia | AAI: assuming schema/model changes only contributed by community. Also depends on AAI modelling SME availability | Nokia, Swisscom, Huawei |
...