Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Feb 16th, 2021 at 2pm UTC

  • ONAP/OVP - Interested in pursuing badging for ONAP CNF workloads in 2021?
  • <EMCO>?

Feb 23rd, 2021 at 2pm UTC

Action Items (In Progress)

  •  (Thinh): Share the ETSI event link when it will be available
  •  (Thinh): Share an alternative (Common CNF Packaging) to what was proposed by Fernando Oliveira , Byung-Woo Jun
  •  (Olivier): Check with CNCF if any cross-meeting with ONAP could be scheduled 
  •  (All): Collect feedback about our current CNF onboarding capabilities from 3rd party vendors
  •  (All): Build an ONAP proposition value to collaborate with XGVela Community
  •  (Seshu): Questions for XGVela
    • It would be great to highlight more clearly the purpose of XGVela as a platform to build CNFs and get feedback from 3rd party vendors, who are today already creating CNFS for carriers, to assess the value proposition
    • After the CNF is created via XGVela – can we then deploy the CNF on any Cloud environment without using XGVela at run-time?
    • If we need XGVela then have we performed an analysis to demonstrate the value proposition vs K8S and its ecosystem?
    • Build a slide to highlight how XGVela (i.e. create  CNF) is complementary to ONAP (onboard CNF/orchestrate CNF, etc.) and how it will fit to the CNCF Landscape
  •  (All) Try to identify where we are on the CNCF Trail Journey - Needs clarification to comment, need to dig into the details of the actual ask.

...