Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  •  (Seshu): Check if user-67d6f , Lei Huang , Yan Yang can join March 2nd, 2021 to discuss about OVP/ONAP & VNFSDK
  •  (Timo/Catherine): Promote 2021 goals from OVP program and collect any particular requirement through ONAP Requirement and TSC meetings
  •  (Kenny): Contact EUAG about any CNF badging requirement (OVP)
  •  (Thinh): Share the ETSI event link when it will be available
  •  (Thinh): Share an alternative (Common CNF Packaging) to what was proposed by Fernando Oliveira , Byung-Woo Jun
  •  (Olivier): Check with CNCF if any cross-meeting with ONAP could be scheduled 
  •  (All): Collect feedback about our current CNF onboarding capabilities from 3rd party vendors
  •  (All): Build an ONAP proposition value to collaborate with XGVela Community
  •  (Seshu): Questions for XGVela
    • It would be great to highlight more clearly the purpose of XGVela as a platform to build CNFs and get feedback from 3rd party vendors, who are today already creating CNFS for carriers, to assess the value proposition
    • After the CNF is created via XGVela – can we then deploy the CNF on any Cloud environment without using XGVela at run-time?
    • If we need XGVela then have we performed an analysis to demonstrate the value proposition vs K8S and its ecosystem?
    • Build a slide to highlight how XGVela (i.e. create  CNF) is complementary to ONAP (onboard CNF/orchestrate CNF, etc.) and how it will fit to the CNCF Landscape
  •  (All) Try to identify where we are on the CNCF Trail Journey - Needs clarification to comment, need to dig into the details of the actual ask.

...