Versions Compared

Old Version 11

changes.mady.by.user Ofir Sonsino

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Ofir Sonsino

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Project NameEnter the name of the project
Target Release NameBeijing Release
Project Lifecycle StateMature Incubation (Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information)
Participating Company AT&T, Amdocs, Nokia

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

...

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

...

AreaActual LevelTargeted Level for current ReleaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance01Do benchmark
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability0172 hours test
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency12Use Galera cluster
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security01Cover 50% with JUnits
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability01Test single site horizontal
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability110
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability11Update user guides
  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation

...

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
NANANANANATBDHigh level description of the APIDate for which the API is reviewed and agreedTBDLink toward the detailed API description

  • Third Party Products Dependencies

...

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
To fill outTo fill outTo fill out

  • Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

  • Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

...