...
DCAE Policy Handler
| Code Block | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
https://pdp:8081/pdp/api/getConfig POST Content-Type: application/json {"configAttributes": {}, "unique": false, "ecompName": "DCAE", "configName": ".*", "policyName": ".*vFirewall*"} # # Returns # { "policyConfigMessage": "Config Retrieved! ", "policyConfigStatus": "CONFIG_RETRIEVED", "type": "JSON", "config": "{\"service\":\"tca_policy\",\"location\":\"SampleServiceLocation\",\"uuid\":\"test\",\"policyName\":\"MicroServicevFirewall\",\"description\":\"MicroService vFirewall Policy\",\"configName\":\"SampleConfigName\",\"templateVersion\":\"OpenSource.version.1\",\"version\":\"1.1.0\",\"priority\":\"1\",\"policyScope\":\"resource=SampleResource,service=SampleService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=ControlLoop-vFirewall-d0a1dfc6-94f5-4fd4-a5b5-4630b438850a\",\"riskType\":\"SampleRiskType\",\"riskLevel\":\"1\",\"guard\":\"False\",\"content\":{\"policyVersion\":\"v0.0.1\",\"threshholds\":[{\"severity\":\"MAJOR\",\"fieldPath\":\"$.event.measurementsForVfScalingFields.vNicUsageArray[*].receivedTotalPacketsDelta\",\"thresholdValue\":\"300\",\"closedLoopEventStatus\":\"ONSET\",\"closedLoopControlName\":\"ControlLoop-vFirewall-d0a1dfc6-94f5-4fd4-a5b5-4630b438850a\",\"version\":\"1.0.2\",\"direction\":\"LESS_OR_EQUAL\"},{\"severity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"fieldPath\":\"$.event.measurementsForVfScalingFields.vNicUsageArray[*].receivedTotalPacketsDelta\",\"thresholdValue\":\"700\",\"closedLoopEventStatus\":\"ONSET\",\"closedLoopControlName\":\"ControlLoop-vFirewall-d0a1dfc6-94f5-4fd4-a5b5-4630b438850a\",\"version\":\"1.0.2\",\"direction\":\"GREATER_OR_EQUAL\"}],\"policyName\":\"DCAE.Config_tca-hi-lo\",\"controlLoopSchemaType\":\"VNF\",\"policyScope\":\"DCAE\",\"eventName\":\"vFirewallBroadcastPackets\"}}", "policyName": "com.Config_MS_CSIT_kf0zc9b9olvs2gm_vFirewall.1.xml", ### Where did this come from?? Why isn't this com.MicroServicevFirewall?? "policyType": "MicroService", "policyVersion": "1", "matchingConditions": { "ECOMPName": "DCAE", "ONAPName": "DCAE", "ConfigName": "SampleConfigName", "service": "tca_policy", "uuid": "test", "Location": "SampleServiceLocation" }, "responseAttributes": {}, "property": null } # # The contents of the config UNESCAPED and PRETTY PRINTED # # MISSING under content: # "tca_policy": { # "domain": "measurementsForVfScaling", # "metricsPerEventName": [ # # { "service": "tca_policy", "location": "SampleServiceLocation", "uuid": "test", "policyName": "MicroServicevFirewall", "description": "MicroService vFirewall Policy", "configName": "SampleConfigName", "templateVersion": "OpenSource.version.1", "version": "1.1.0", "priority": "1", "policyScope": "resource=SampleResource,service=SampleService,type=SampleType,closedLoopControlName=ControlLoop-vFirewall-d0a1dfc6-94f5-4fd4-a5b5-4630b438850a", "riskType": "SampleRiskType", "riskLevel": "1", "guard": "False", "content": { "policyVersion": "v0.0.1", "threshholds": [ { "severity": "MAJOR", "fieldPath": "$.event.measurementsForVfScalingFields.vNicUsageArray[*].receivedTotalPacketsDelta", "thresholdValue": "300", "closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET", "closedLoopControlName": "ControlLoop-vFirewall-d0a1dfc6-94f5-4fd4-a5b5-4630b438850a", "version": "1.0.2", "direction": "LESS_OR_EQUAL" }, { "severity": "CRITICAL", "fieldPath": "$.event.measurementsForVfScalingFields.vNicUsageArray[*].receivedTotalPacketsDelta", "thresholdValue": "700", "closedLoopEventStatus": "ONSET", "closedLoopControlName": "ControlLoop-vFirewall-d0a1dfc6-94f5-4fd4-a5b5-4630b438850a", "version": "1.0.2", "direction": "GREATER_OR_EQUAL" } ], "policyName": "DCAE.Config_tca-hi-lo", "controlLoopSchemaType": "VNF", "policyScope": "DCAE", "eventName": "vFirewallBroadcastPackets" } } |
...
| Code Block | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
tosca_definitions_version: tosca_simple_yaml_1_0_0
imports:
-
tca_policy_model_dublin.yml
policies:
-
onap.vfirewall.tca:
type: onap.policy.monitoring.cdap.tca.hi.lo.app
properties:
domain: measurementsForVfScaling
metricsPerEventName:
-
eventName: vLoadBalancer
controlLoopSchemaType: VNF
policyScope: "resource=vLoadBalancer;type=configuration"
policyName: "onap.vfirewall.tca" # Do we need a name? The unique node name should be enough?
policyVersion: "v0.0.1" # This field should be removed as Policy Create/Update API will return the version
thresholds:
-
closedLoopControlName: "CL-LBAL-LOW-TRAFFIC-SIG-FB480F95-A453-6F24-B767-FD703241AB1A"
closedLoopEventStatus: ONSET
version: "1.0.2"
fieldPath: "$.event.measurementsForVfScalingFields.vNicPerformanceArray[*].receivedBroadcastPacketsAccumulated"
thresholdValue: 500
direction: LESS_OR_EQUAL
severity: MAJOR
-
closedLoopControlName: "CL-LBAL-LOW-TRAFFIC-SIG-0C5920A6-B564-8035-C878-0E814352BC2B"
closedLoopEventStatus: ONSET
version: "1.0.2"
fieldPath: "$.event.measurementsForVfScalingFields.vNicPerformanceArray[*].receivedBroadcastPacketsAccumulated"
thresholdValue: 5000
direction: GREATER_OR_EQUAL
severity: CRITICAL
|
Equivalency Table: Casablanca and Dublin APIs
(Comments pasted from API page)
In an equivalency table, this would be the same as the legacy - createPolicy and updatePolicy. Probably worth to mention for the benefit of other teams. The result would support the JSON format, so clients should expect little or no change.
This URL for POST should create a resource that we need to identify
POST
https://{url}:{port}/api/v1/policytypes/{policy type id}/versions/{version}/policies/
One proposal is to use the closedLoopControlName field:
CL-LBAL-LOW-TRAFFIC-SIG-FB480F95-A453-6F24-B767-FD703241AB1A
and the version in this case:
1.0.2.
The GET for this specific one would be then
GET
https://{url}:{port}/api/v1/policytypes/{policy type id}/versions/{version}/policies/CL-LBAL-LOW-TRAFFIC-SIG-FB480F95-A453-6F24-B767-FD703241AB1A/versions/1.0.2
They can name the policies however they want. If they want to use Closed Loop Control Name go ahead. The problem with the TCA model is they shove all that detail inside the model and use arrays of Control Loops. But its up to them on how they want their model to look.