...
Follow principles/patterns of RESTCONF RFC-8040 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8040
Follow principles/patterns of yang-patch RFC-8072 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8040
Follow principles/patterns of RESTCONF NMDA RFC-8527 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8527
Issues & Decisions
Issues | Notes | Decisions | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | KPI for De-registration of 100 CM-handles | This was mentioned. Was this ever agreed, is this a valid use case that needs to be covered together with the Registration ? | Not priority for now, but acceptable if we match the registration req. |
2 | DMI delay | Could we get some feedback on DMI-delays for other use cases as not mentioned in FS document | Awaiting for ETH feedback AP On Kolawole Adebisi-Adeolokun and Csaba Kocsis Provided |
3 | Number of instances In some cases, ETH have used 2 instances, can we verify the number of instances for each use case. Some of the req were defined per instance and resources used : Identify which of these ? | Agreed to; CPS use 1 instance currently, but should focus on aligning performance with 2 instances for all use case | |
4 | Input Load Distribution the CM-handle search and ID search | Currently has 5 parallel request between them distributed at 2.5 each. This fractional distribution isn't feasible for parallel processing; the load should be allocated as whole numbers. Load needs to be distributed at. Would it be acceptable to adjust this distribution to either 2 or 3 parallel requests each (and vice versa ) without any negative repercussions? Agreed to do 6 parallel request combined total and divide the load to 3 parallel request each | |
5 | Regarding CM-handle search and ID search | FS only identified Module performance, are there any testing done towards a combined search of properties and modules in a single query Confirmed no other testing was previously done on this..... CPS have the capabilities to do mixed testing. ETH tbc on if they want to consider this ( Csaba Kocsis ) |
Requirements
Note |
---|
Please note this section was added long after the implementation and focuses on characteristic and enhancements after this study only. |
Excerpt Include | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Characteristics
It is proposed that reported characteristics will be used as a baseline for NCMP when agreed and sign-off.
Operation | Concurrent requests/parallel | DMI Delay | Response size | Performance Requirement (Blue Stone tablet KPI) | Notes | Sign-Off | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Registration of 20,000 CM-handles (in batches of 100) | 1 (requests are sequential) | 100 ms to get module references | N/A |
|
| |
2 | De-registration of 100 CM-handles | 1 (requests are sequential) | No Module delays | N/A |
| De-registration is currently not mentioned in Stone Tablet KPI or FS, however we have agreed to match the performance of registration for now as de-reg is also not a priority at this point in time | |
3 | CM-handle ID search with Module filter | 3 | N/A | 20,000 CM Handles i.e. 100*20.000 = 2MB | As provided byCsaba Kocsis 0.625 seconds/Operation | FS stated 5 parallel request for both ID search and search. CPS to run with 3 parallel each for both ID search and Search meaning a combine total of 6 parallel request | |
4 | CM-handle search with Module filter | 3 Run in parallel with #3 | N/A | 20,000 CM Handles i.e. 500*20.000 = 10MB | As provided by Csaba Kocsis 13 seconds/Operation | FS stated 5 parallel request for both ID search and search. CPS to test with 3 parallel each for both ID search and Search meaning a combine total of 6 parallel request | |
5 | Synchronous single CM-handle pass-through read | 10 | 300 ms Csaba Kocsis | 5 KB | 25 (parallel) request/sec | Read are done in parallel with Write | |
6 | Synchronous single CM-handle pass-through write (CUD) | 10 | 670 msCsaba Kocsis | 5 KB | 13 (parallel) request/sec | No response is expected | |
7 | Batch/Bulk Read | 1 read request with 200 cmHandles per second | 150 cmhandles/sec | The batch data operation is asynchronous. NCMP returns the response on the ncmp-async-m2m kafka topic. |
Notes
- This is for mixed TCs
- Single KPIs will be monitored in NCMP owned pipeline with our performance every day(2 hrs interval) - Performance
Synchronous single cm-handle pass-through (read) requests
Parameter | Expectation | Notes | Sign-Off | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Response Size | 5KB | Shall not exceed 5KB | |||
Concurrent request | 12 clients requests toward 1 NCMP simultaneously DMI also support 12 simultaneous requests | 40ms of overhead on top of DMI latency for each requests, at most for NCMP request. This shall remain within 40ms for 12 parallel requests. Given the DMI delay below; this means up to 240 request per second | |||
DMI Delay | 10ms | This is not in control of CPS. Assume DMI is 1.25 seconds average DMI response time for high latency, low latency =10 ms, this should also work for DMI Plugin. I.e 40ms ontop of the DMI. 1.25seconds+40ms= 1.29seconds | |||
Test Environment |
| ||||
Security | Disable Basic Authentication in Springboot | If configurable from application yaml, then it’s acceptable. |
Open Issues & Decisions
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...
NCMP URI format to follow below pattern<OP>/ncmp/<v{vNumber}>/ch/<cmHandle>/<data|operations|{ncmpAction}>/ds/{datastore}/[rp:]{resourcePath}?{query}
<OP>/ncmp/<v{vNumber}>/ch/<cmHandle>/<data|operations|{ncmpAction}>/ds/{datastore}?[rp:]{resourcePath}&{options}
Below table shows the proposed interface, actual implementation might deviate from this but can be accessed from
- Gerrit Source
- Read-the-docs: https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-cps/en/latest/design.html#offered-apis
URI | Mandatory or Optional | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
<OP> | the HTTP method | Mandatory | ||
ncmp / | the ncmp root resource | Mandatory | ||
<v{vNumber}> | version of the ncmp interface <path> is the target resource URI <query> is the query parameter list | Mandatory | ||
ch/<cmHandle> | unique (string) identifier of a yang tree instance. | Mandatory | ||
<data|operations|{ncmpAction}> | request category - yang data, rpc operation or a (non-modelled) ncmp api action. this could be data, operations or ncmpAction (e.g. 'sync-data') | Mandatory | ||
ds/{datastore} | Mandatory | |||
<resourcePath><resourceIdentifier> | the path expression identifying the resource that is being accessed by the operation. If this field is not present, then the target resource is the API itself. | Optional | ||
<options> | Parameters with | <query> | the set of parameters associated with the RESTCONF message; see Section 3.4 of [RFC3986]. RESTCONF parameters have the familiar form of "name=value" pairs. Most query Query parameters are optional to implement by the server and optional to use by the client. Each optional query parameter is identified by a URI | Optional DMI should be able to support (/pass through) ANY parameter associated with the RESTCONF message; see Section 3.4 of [RFC3986]. |
Datastores
New datastores are defined for ncmp to access the CPS 'running' or 'operational' datastore.
Alternatively, the request can be sent directly to the 'device' itself (bypassing CPS datastores) using one of the 'passthrough-*' datastores options as below
...
Excerpt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Datastore, Paths and Format Combinations for Read Operations
non-config
*Note Convert cpsPath to RESTConfPath wil only support 'absolute' cpsPath for conversion no query-type paths Read Example
Works Items for above.
Datastore, Paths and Format Combinations for Write Operations
Write Example
|
Sync & Model API
Expand | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NCMP / DMI Overview
Expand | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...