Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

AreaActual levelTargeted level for current releaseHow, EvidencesComments
Performance0

0

(given CLAMP is design time there is no point to adhere to L2 requirement) 

Run performance basic test, depends on performance criteria availability for level 1 - not able to commit to more than what was done on Beijing
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability11

Participate to Stability runs Level 1

Jira
serverONAP JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
keyCLAMP-100

  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency11

Jira
serverONAP JIRA
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
keyCLAMP-83

  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security11
  • Reach CII passing badge, increasing test coverage as remaining item
  • AAF CADI integration
  • Infrastructure setup for js test coverage



  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage, including no critical and high known vulnerabilities>60 days old
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal/external communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls based on CADI
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability11

Level 1 single site horizontal scaling

Jira
serverONAP JIRA
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
keyCLAMP-102

  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability1

1

(2, if CLAMP can get more resource from the community

2

(1 if not enough resource)


  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
    ; All application logging to adhere to
    ONAP Application Logging Specification v1.2

  • 3 - Transaction tracing across components

Usability1

21

(1 if not enough resource)2, if CLAMP can get more resource from the community)

CLAMP is not anticipating new API at this point, so we are technically compliant with API CVS at this point

  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – API documentation; usability testing; tutorial documentation;

    All new API’s must adhere to the ONAP API Common Versioning Strategy and Documentation Guidelines; All existing APIs must be documented in Swagger 2.0

  • 3 - UI consistency; usability testing; API Documentation

    (changed and external APIs follow policy)

  • 4 - API Documentation (all follow policy)




     

...

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
new policy api(and contents) for guard policies creation not defined yet 


 "vf_module_id" usage for scale out use case not yet completely confirmed implement textbox to manually enter target parameter(for policy api call)use the textbox to enter the value of whatever vf_module id's we need to make the CL works 

Resources

Link toward the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

Release Milestone

...