Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Follow principles/patterns of RESTCONF RFC-8040 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8040
Follow principles/patterns of yang-patch RFC-8072 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8040
Follow principles/patterns of RESTCONF NMDA RFC-8527 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8527

Requirements

Note

Please note this section was added long after the implementation and focuses on characteristic only.

Issues & Decisions


IssuesNotesDecisions
1KPI for De-registration of 100 CM-handlesThis was mentioned. Was this ever agreed, is this a valid use case that needs to be covered together with the Registration
see
?

Not priority for now, but acceptable if we match the registration req.
#2 for de-reg  
kieran mccarthy Kolawole Adebisi-Adeolokun 

2DMI delayCould we get some feedback on DMI-delays for other use cases as not mentioned in FS document
Will wait

Awaiting for ETH feedback

2024 

Characteristics - WIP


Provided

3

Number of instances


In some cases, ETH have used 2 instances, can we verify the number of instances for each use case.

Some of the req were defined per instance and resources used : Identify which of these ? 

Agreed to;

CPS use 1 instance currently, but should focus on aligning performance with 2 instances for all use case 

4Input Load Distribution the CM-handle search and ID search

Currently has 5 parallel request between them distributed at 2.5 each. This fractional distribution isn't feasible for parallel processing; the load should be allocated as whole numbers. Load needs to be distributed at. Would it be acceptable to adjust this distribution to either 2 or 3 parallel requests each (and vice versa ) without any negative repercussions?


Agreed to do 6 parallel request combined total and divide the load to 3 parallel request each

5Regarding CM-handle search and ID search

FS only identified Module performance, are there any testing done towards a combined search of properties and modules in a single query


Confirmed no other testing was previously done on this.....  

CPS have the capabilities to do mixed testing. ETH tbc on if they want to consider this ( Csaba Kocsis )


Requirements

Note

Please note this section was added long after the implementation and focuses on characteristic and enhancements after this study only.


Characteristics

It is proposed that reported characteristics will be used as a It is proposed that reported characteristics will be used as a baseline for NCMP when agreed and sign-off.


Operation
Total CM-handles registered
Concurrent requests/parallelDMI Delay
NotesRest response
Response sizePerformance Requirement
Observed Rate
(rate not measured
(Blue Stone tablet KPI)
Expected duration
NotesSign-Off
1Registration of
100
20,000 CM-handles
20k Nodes (200 operations
(in batches of 100)1 (requests are sequential)

100 ms to get module references

1000

1,000 ms to get module resources

Currently without Modulesettag, when // start using Modulesettag, we'll need to revisit these numbers. 

  • Currently as per FS -
  • module references - 20k 
  • get module resources -1000 unique module ref. 
  • 5 different types of Nodes

ST

N/A

11 NEs/second ST

NCMP should be target 22 NEs/Second 

TBD

N/A

  • 11 CM-Handles/second as per Stone Tablet E2E Wich include module conversion warm-up
  • NCMP Budget: 22 Cm Handles/second 
  1. Batch Size: 100 (per request)
    Not using Module Set Tags
  2. Time measured start of first rest-call until all cm handle states READY
  3. 1,000 unique module references.
  4. Five different types of Nodes. So 5 requests for Module Resources. Avg 200 modules each.
2De-registration of 100 CM-handles
20k Nodes (200 operations)
1 (requests are sequential)

No Module delays

Not in the StoneTablet.

N/A

  • 11 NEs/second
CPS
  • NCMP should
be
  • target 22 NEs/Second 
CPS to record & report2.5 parallel (5)

De-registration is currently not mentioned in Stone Tablet KPI or FS, however we have agreed to match the performance of registration for now as de-reg is also not a priority at this point in time




3CM-handle ID search with Module filter
20k Nodes

3
Run in parallel with #4

N/A
Combine test3&4 to = 5 (2.5 each)100byte*20k

TBD will be derived when testing is done in ETH envi

20,000 CM Handles i.e.
100*20.000 = 2MB

As provided byCsaba Kocsis 0.625 seconds/Operation

FS stated 5 parallel request for both ID search and search.  CPS to run with 3 parallel each for both ID search and Search meaning a combine total of 6 parallel request 
TDB2.5 parallel

4CM-handle search with Module filter
20k Nodes
3
Run in parallel with #3
N/A
500bytes*20k per handleTBD will be derived when testing is done in ETH envi
20,000 CM Handles i.e.
500*20.000 = 10MB

As provided by Csaba Kocsis 13 seconds/Operation

FS stated 5 parallel request for both ID search and search.  CPS to test with 3 parallel each for both ID search and Search meaning a combine total of 6 parallel request 
TDB

5Synchronous single CM-handle pass-through read
20k Nodes

10

Awaiting input from eth Csaba Kocsis

Read are done

Run in parallel with

Writes

#6

5 KB

25

op

(parallel) request/sec

shall not exceedTBD

Read are done in parallel with Write

TDBAwaiting input from eth

6Synchronous single CM-handle pass-through write (CUD)
20k Nodes

10

10
Run in parallel with #5

670 ms

5 KB

13 (parallel) request/sec

No response is expected

5kb

13 ops/sec 

TBD
7Batch/Bulk Read

1 read request with  200 cmHandles per second



150 cmhandles/sec

The batch data operation is asynchronous. NCMP returns the response on the ncmp-async-m2m kafka topic.

TDB


Notes

  1. This is for mixed TCs
  2. Single KPIs will be monitored in NCMP owned pipeline with our performance every day(2 hrs interval) - Performance

...