Table of Contents |
---|
Overview
The second API proposed under the Delta feature is to generate a delta between configuration stored under an Anchor and JSON payload provided by the user. All the responses and exceptions thrown by this API will be similar to the API to generate delta between 2 anchors to maintain consistency between the API's.
Issues & Decisions
Questions/Issues | Decisions/Answers | How should the reporting of xPaths of newly added data nodes in JSON payload be done in a schema free approach for delta feature | Should the "descendants" option be provided as part of the API? The JSON payload may or may not contain all the child data nodes. Hence there is always the uncertainty. So, would it be a better approach to fetch all descendants always from the anchor and compare them against the JSON payload? |
---|---|---|---|
HTTP response codes for Delta between Anchor and Payload API
Proposed API
The proposed API will be part of the CPS Data Interface. This API takes multipart form data as request body, using this the user can provide the JSON payload and its corresponding Schema Context in form of a Yang or ZIP file. This file will only be used to generate the data nodes from the JSON payload and will not be persisted in CPS DB. The following response codes will be returned by the API:
# | Sub Interface | Method | Scenario | HTTP Response codes to be implemented | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Data | Proposed API: | |||
POST- /v2/dataspaces/{dataspace-name}/anchors/{anchor-name}/ | |||||
deltaPayload?xpath={xpath} | |||||
Proposed method name: CpsDataApi.getDeltaByDataspaceAnchorAndPayload()
| Generate a delta report between an anchor and JSON payload |
|
Request parameters:
Parameter name | In | Required | Description |
---|---|---|---|
dataspace-name | Path | Yes | Dataspace name |
anchor | Path | Yes | Anchor Name/Reference Anchor |
xpath | Query | Yes | xpath of the node |
descendants | Query | No | Level of descendants for delta comparison |
. Set to INCLUDE_ALL_DESCENDANTS by default. |
Request body:
Content-Type: multipart/form-data
Type | Format | Description |
---|---|---|
File | Yang file/Zip file | file containing the schema details. |
Text/String | JSON payload as plain text | raw JSON payload |
Response Body/Delta Report Format
Code Block | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
[ { "action": "ADD", "xpath": "/bookstore/categories/[@code=3]", "target-data": { "code": 3, "name": "kidz" } }, { "action": "DELETE", "xpath": "/bookstore/categories/[@code=1]", "source-data": { "code": 1, "name": "Fiction" } }, { "action": "UPDATE", "xpath": "/bookstore/categories/[@code=2]", "source-data": { "name": "Funny" }, "target-data": { "name": "Comic" } } ] |
Alternative approach for schema free delta report.
Problem Statement
The problem with 2nd Delta API is that it needs to compare any JSON payload to data stored under an anchor. This JSON payload can be coming from any source and regardless of its schema a delta should be generated between the payload and the data under the anchor.
The preferable approach here would be to parse the JSON payload into DataNodes and then compare the generated DataNodes against the DataNodes under the anchor. This would allow us to have a delta report which is in line with CPS and would enable us to provide crucial detail about the data nodes that is their xpath.
But since the second API accepts any JSON string as an input, one cannot be always sure that the payload will have the same schema as the anchor. And hence the approach of parsing to DataNodes can only happen when the schemas are identical.
In cases where schemas are not identical, there as soon as we attempt to parse the payload to DataNode, CPS will throw an exception terminating the parsing.
The most feasible alternative is to make use of JSON Nodes along with JSON path. Where JSON Nodes and JSON Path are used as a replacement for DataNodes and xPaths respectively.
Use of JSON Nodes and JSON Path
Another alternative approach can be use of JSON Nodes and JSON Path as a replacement for DataNodes and xPaths respectively. In this approach, we can use JSON Paths to identify if a JSON Node has been added or deleted and if two identical JSON Paths exist in source anchor and the JSON payload then a comparison of JSON Nodes will be performed.
In order to achieve this the overall approach will be divided into two parts,
First, we determine if the JSON payload has the same schema as the data within the anchor. To do so the payload will be parsed against the schema information retrieved from the anchor and DataNodes will be formulated using this schema. If the parsing of JSON payload to DataNodes fails, then this would mean the schema differs and we switch to the alternative approach. If the parsing is successful we can go ahead with generating delta between the DataNodes.
If the parsing fails then, the data from source anchor needs to be fetched as a JSON string. And then both the JSON payload and the data from the anchor will be parsed to JSON Nodes and their respective JSON paths.
Once this is done a separate algorithm will be used to find the delta between JSON Nodes.
JSON Path
The most suitable candidate to be used as replacement for xpath are JSON path, a sample JSON path looks like this:
Code Block |
---|
$.store.book[0].title |
Here:
- $ symbol refers to the root object or element.
- . operator is the dot-child operator, which you use to denote a child element of the current element.
- [ ] is the subscript operator, which you use to denote a child element of the current element (by name or index).
In order to utilize the JSON Path a new algorithm will need to be implemented to generate JSON paths from the available JSON Nodes.
Also, the existing delta algorithm can then be modified and reused for JSON path and JSON nodes.
Note |
---|
Note: Open for suggestions for alternative approaches |
...
Functional Details about the API
The proposed API will be used to generate a delta between data fetched from an anchor against JSON payload provided by the user. The following are some key functional details about the API:
- The second Delta API utilizes the same algorithm which is used by the 1st CPS Delta API i.e. the API to generate delta between 2 anchors, by doing so we can ensure consistent results between both APIs, similar performance in delta generation and easier maintainability of code.
- The second API fetches the data from the anchor provided as part of request and compares it to the raw JSON payload which is also sent as part of the request.
- In order to generate the delta report in the expected format, the JSON payload needs to be parsed into data nodes which would provide essential details such as xpath and leaf data.
- In order to parse the JSON payload to data nodes, the schema context of the JSON is required. The schema can be fetched using two approaches depending on the user's requirement:
- The request body is of type multipart form data and accepts two parameters, one is the JSON payload as Text/String and the second is an optional parameter to provide the schema details in form of a yang or zip file. If the schema details are provided as part of request body, then the particular schema will be used to parse the JSON payload into data nodes.
- If no Schema detail is provided as part of the request, then the algorithm will fetch the Schema Context using the anchor name, but here the assumption is that the JSON payload has same schema as that of the anchor.
- If no schema is provided explicitly then the assumption is that the JSON payload has same schema as that of the anchor and it uses the anchor name to get the schema context which it, then uses to parse the JSON payload to data nodes. If in case, no schema is provided, and the schema of the anchor does not match the schema of the JSON payload then appropriate error message will be thrown.
- The descendants option is not provided as part of the request and is set to INCLUDE_ALL_DESCENDANTS by default, as one cannot be sure whether the JSON payload contains the descendants similar to the descendants in the anchor. So, the best-case scenario is to fetch all the descendants under the anchor and compare them to JSON payload.