| Table of Contents | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
DRAFT
|
This template should be filled out for any project wishing to move to the "Mature" phase of the ONAP project lifecycle. It should be copied under the Project Maturity Reviews page & completed. Once complete, the requestor should send the link to the onap-tsc mailing list to initiate the maturity review. Further information: Project Reviews
FYI, per the ONAP Technical Community Document, the metrics for maturity review are:
›Successful participation in releases: The project demonstrates stable output (code base, documents) within its history of releases in accordance with the release policy.
›Architecture has been reviewed by the Architecture Committee
›Project is active and contributes to ONAP: The project demonstrates a stable or increasing number of contributions across recent releases. Contributions are commits which got merged to a repository of an ONAP project or a related upstream project. Commits can for example be patches to update the requirements document of a project, code addition to an ONAP or upstream project repository, new test cases and so forth.
›Mature artifacts produced: The project demonstrates that the artifacts produced by the project are deployable (where applicable) and have been successfully deployed, configured and used by end users (typically, service providers).
Project Name:
Project Description:
- Provide high level description of the project
Leadership Resources :
...
Role
...
First Name Last Name
...
Linux Foundation ID
...
Email Address
...
...
...
...
Review Submission Date: TBD
Project Description
VNFSDK provides required tools for packaging CSAR and verfiying CSAR compliance to align with VNFREQS. It aslo provides VNF Test Platform (VTP) as a micro service to enable the VNF testing at various phase of VNF badging (OVP), Network service Designing (Design-time), etc.
It aalso provides VES agent for VNF metrics collections.
Project Landing Page: VNFSDK Project
Project Meeting Minutes: VNFSDK meetings
Leadership Resources Resources and Repositories (Deprecated)#VNFSDK
Role | Name | Linux Foundation Login (LFID) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTL | mkr1481 | ||
| Committers | Lianhao Lu | LianhaoLu | |
| Victor Gao | g310497 | ||
| Andy Mayer | ajmayer | ||
| Alex Vul | avul | ||
| Wenyao Guan | guanwenyao | ||
| Moshe Hoadley | moshe_hoadley | moshehoa@amdocs.com | |
Kailun Qin | kailun.qin | kailun.qin@intel.com | |
| Bogumil Zebek | bogumil_zebek | bogumil.zebek@nokia.com |
Project & Release History
- How long the project has been an active: At launch
- Release Participation: All Releases
- Engagement levels for past releases (up to 3):
- Commits per Release: see below
- Contributors per Release: see below
Companies per release: see below
Statistics taken from Bitergia : Bitergia
Release name and timeframe | commits | contributors | companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam ( 1/1/2017 to 11/16/2017 ) | 447 | 26 | 9 |
| Beijing ( 11/17/2017 to 6/7/2018 ) | 230 | 18 | 8 |
| Cassablanca ( 6/8/2018 to 11/30/2018 ) | 133 | 16 | 8 |
| Dublin ( 12/1/2018 to 7/9/2019 ) | 105 | 15 | 9 |
| El Alto ( 7/10/2019 to 10/24/2019 ) | 62 | 18 | 3 |
| Frankfurt ( 10/25/2019 to 6/18/2020 ) | 75 | 15 | 7 |
Use Cases: All use cases for various releases supported by VNFSDK listed here:
- VNFREQS test cases - Dovetail integration (Casablanca)
- VSP Compliance check - OVP (Dublin)
- VNF Lifecycle validation - OVP (ElAlto & Frankfurt)
- Test Automation (Guilin)
Architecture Alignment
VNFSDK is highlighted here
Artifact Information
- VNFSDK Repo:https://gerrit.onap.org/r/admin/repos/q/filter:vnfsdk
- VFSDK is used by OVP and operators for VNF testing.
- VNFSDK document:https://docs.onap.org/projects/onap-vnfsdk-model/en/latest/index.html#
- Nexus Artifacts: https://nexus.onap.org/content/repositories/releases/org/onap/vnfsdk
Docker Images: https://hub.docker.com/r/onap/vnfsdk-refrepo
Other Information
Code Coverage stats - VNFSDK Sonar
VNFSDK Bitergia (below was taken for last 90 days)
...
Project & Release History
The Policy Framework Project has been an active ONAP Project since Amsterdam and has participated in ALL releases through Frankfurt.
Use Case Participation
The key use cases that the Policy Framework project has contributed to are the following:
vFirewall
Scale Out
vCPE
CCVPN
5G OOF SON
BBS
Bitergia Statistics from the Last 2 Years
Architecture Alignment:
Last Architecture Review was for Frankfurt on 12/17/2019 with the results posted here: Policy R6 Frankfurt Architecture Review
Artifact Information:
- Describe & provide links to the artifacts (code, test cases, documentation) that the project has created.
- Describe the project's success & contributions in integration testing
The Policy Team supports the Integration vFirewall Use Case Testing every release and contributes changes to the Integration Robot Framework and Testsuite when updates are necessary.
Some example JIRA's for this:
| Jira | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jira | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Jira | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
integration/oparent support
Policy team members support the Integration oparent project
Team actively supports oparent checkstyle in all our repos. Our verify jobs will fail on any checkstyle violation.
Companies that run ONAP Policy internally
To our knowledge, the following companies have used ONAP Policy Framework internally: AT&T, Ericsson, Bell Canada, Tech Mahindra, Wipro.
Other Information:
ONAP Policy Framework has had topics and demo's at the ONAP Developer and LFN ONES conferences. Here is a list of recent demo's:
2019-06-12 LFN DDF Plugfest Kista, Sweden - won Best Demo award!
2019-09-23-25 ONS at Antwerp, Belgium Policy Framework Demonstration
2020-01-15 LF ONAP Prague DDF Policy Framework - Frankfurt Improvements
2020-04-23 LF Virtual Technical Event - Policy Framework Overview
Control Loop Sub Committee:
The Policy Framework Project has been active in the Control Loop subcommittee from its inception. Working very closely with CLAMP and DCAE to support the automation and enhancement of Control Loops in ONAP.
...