...

This release is targeting ONAP's Minimal Environment and, as a stretch goal, the vFW use case.

Minimum Viable Product

...

The work will be approached in three phases:

Phase 1: Minimize the footprint of container images used on ONAP Minimal Environment

Phase 2: Build platform-agnostic container images (i.e. multi-cpu architecture support) for the vFW use case.ONAP minimal environment

Phase 23: Minimize the footprint of container images used on the vFW use case.

Phase 4: Build platform-agnostic container images (i.e. multi-cpu architecture support) for vFW use case.

Phase 5: Review Dockerfiles for the vFW use case, identify patterns 3: Review dockerfiles for the vFW use case, identify patterns and propose re-usable Dockerfile templates.

...

List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

...

Stories

...

...

Stories

...

...

Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.

Working on the vFW use case will provide the foundation for the optimization of the entire onap container base.

The lessons learned during Casablanca will be put to use and refined during this release.

The next logical step is to expand, on futures releases, the containers and use cases that can benefit from producing efficient vendor-agnostic container images.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

...

Contributions in the form of

-modifications to the Dockerfile generating container images.

-when appropriate, modifications to the build process

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

...

• 0 -- none
• 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
• 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented

...

• 0 – none
• 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
• 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
• 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate

...

• 0 – none
• 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
• 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
• 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)

...

• 0 – none
• 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
• 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
• 3 – CII Gold

Longer term roadmap

Working on the vFW use case will provide the foundation for the optimization of the entire onap container base.

The lessons learned during Casablanca will be put to use and refined during this release.

The next logical step is to expand, on futures releases, the containers and use cases that can benefit from producing efficient vendor-agnostic container images.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

Changes introduced to the code base by this project, as described above, fit within the ONAP architecture diagram.

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

• API Incoming Dependencies

No API dependencies are expected.

• API Outgoing Dependencies

No API dependencies are expected and this project does not deliver APIs to other projects.

• Third Party Products Dependencies

Testing Strategies

Background

A container image is just another software packaging format (typically a bunch of compressed tar files). Base images offer just the foundation and they are immutable and sealed.
For those reasons, changing the base image doesn't change the logic of the service it delivers and doesn't require any special kind of tests.

Migrating containers to different base image does not affect functional testing

The same test method and tools in use today will work with the new container you run from a smaller base image.

Testing each service:

a) in isolation - running unit test and
b) running service tests (or API contract tests) and
c) using point-to-point integration tests (pairwise)

will continue to use the same test artifacts you use today.

Why? mainly because you are running containers in Linux now and you will continue to run containers in Linux after.

Roles and Responsibilities

Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

Documentation, Training

• The team maintains documentation and guidelines on the their wiki page.

Other Information

• Vendor Neutral

The project contributions are predicated on the need to make ONAP vendor-neutral.

• Free and Open Source Software

Each project will

...

• 0 – no ability to scale
• 1 – single site horizontal scaling
• 2 – geographic scaling
• 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances

...

• 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
• 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management

...

• 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
• 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation

• API Incoming Dependencies

No API dependencies are expected.

• API Outgoing Dependencies

No API dependencies are expected.

API this project is delivering to other projects.

...

• Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

...

Linux/Intel version

Linux/aarch64 version

...

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

• Testing and Integration Plans

Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

• Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

...

• Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

• Risks

List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).

...

• Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

• Release Milestone

The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.

• Team Internal Milestone

This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

...

• Documentation, Training

• Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
• Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
• High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
• Documentation includes items such as:
  • Installation instructions
  • Configuration instructions
  • Developer guide
  • End User guide
  • Admin guide
  • ...

...

• Vendor Neutral

If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.

• Free and Open Source Software

FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.

Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.

...