...
- Proposed name for the project:
ConfigPersistencySvc
- Proposed name for the repository:
ConfigPersistencySvc
- Project Logo:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Configuration Persistence Service is a platform component that is designed to serve as a data repository for Run time data that needs to be persistent. It is characterized by the following purpose statements:
...
SHARED SERVICE - The diagram below shows how the Configuration Persistence Service project fits into the overall ONAP architecture as a shared (common) service serving as a data layer for other ONAP components.
A&AI INDEPENDENCE - The Configuration Persistence Service stores information that is conceptual distinct from A&AI. The data is related because the DB also needs to keep track of the existence of xNFs; and A&AI is the master of resources & services. For more information about how information from A&AI is "synced" with the Configuration Persistence Service see the Operational Description section below.
DATA LAYER - Architecture conclusions is that this component should serve as a data layer to other components and be a data lake serving as a repository for storing run-time information. It shall also be within the shared services part of the architecture. Architecture concluded that this project should be an independent component in ONAP platform.
SCOPE (Type of Info Stored) - The type of information stored in the Configuration Persistence Service is run-time configuration, operational, and policy information.
ARCHITECTURE CONSISTENCY - The project is consistent with a data-centric ONAP architecture.
The following are links to Architecture related pages that describe the flows and component interfaces:
Architecture Info | Wiki Links | ARCHITECTURE FLOWS|
ARCHCOM: InfoFlow - RunTime Config DB Information Flow | COMPONENT DESCRIPTION R6 | ARC RunTime DB Component Description - R6 Frankfurt |
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION R7 | ARC Configuration & Persistency Service (CnPS) Component Description - Guilin (R7) Release | |
PROJECT PROPOSAL | RunTime Config DB Project Proposal (Oct 25 2019)Oct 25 2019) |
ARCHITECTURE CPS FLOW
The following page contains the CPS flows.
The flows detail the information flows in particular uses of CPS.
ARCHCOM: InfoFlow - Configuration Persistence Service (CPS) Information Flow
DEPLOYMENT VIEW
Excerpt Include | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPS SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
HTTPS
- CPS is compatible and in the process of migrating to a service mesh via the ONAP service mesh implementation. (https://gerrit.onap.org/r/c/oom/+/124287)
Logging and Monitoring
- CPS uses spring boots Logback and Log4j for logging information without exposing credentials (usernames and passwords).
- CPS has no logging of sensitive information such as usernames and passwords in plain text. The log files are only accessible within the authorized users of the application deployment.
SECURITY ASSURANCE
Input Validation
- CPS uses spring boot input validation support for initial input validation.
- CPS uses java mechanisms to further validate inputs such as parameters.
- CPS accepts models and data which are validated via a third-party tool (OpenDayLight YANG parser).
Authentication and Authorization
- CPS uses Basic Authentication control provided by spring security
- Usernames and passwords are configurable by the clients via passing the environment variables for use in application.yml file.
- For deployments, CPS uses K8s secrets which are generated and stored as the application is deployed.
When CPS is run with docker, the services use usernames and passwords that are stored as environment variables.
CPS does not run docker containers or services as 'root'.
- For deployments, CPS uses K8s secrets which are generated and stored as the application is deployed.
OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION
C&PS DB operation is described. The following sections describe the basic operations of C&PS DB.
BASIC CONCEPTS & PRINCIPLES
ASSOCIATIONS - These are "linkages" between elements within elements (or data records) in the database. Thus, this database is a relational database in the connective sense of a relational database (as opposed to the composition sense of a relational database).
CARDINALITY RULES - This allows for the specification of a cardinality of element associations. For example, one PNF might have a limit to the number of associated logical elements, such as a Logical Cell that it is allowed to have.
LINKING RESTRICTIONS - There may be rules which allow a operator to specify restrictions on the kind of associations that can be made. For example, an operator might want a particular kind of PNF to link to a specific kind of Logical object, such as a cell.
- DATA LAYER - This project is meant to serve as a data layer to other ONAP components. This means that it will be an intermediary for a component to write and access data.
- PERSISTENCY - The Configuration Persistence Service is meant to store data persistently, which means that it can hold data over time without losing it.
- SYNCHRONIZATION - The concept of synchronization is the ability to align data between the database and something else, such as an external source, or a xNF. For example, the Configuration Persistence Service needs to synchronize to A&AI view of the available resources in the system. See the section on Synchronization below.
- STORAGE vs OWNERSHIP - The Database STORES data, provides persistency, and gives access to data. The information is created, defined and used by other ONAP components. The OWNERSHIP and life cycle management is the responsibility of that other ONAP component. The DB stores the data but does not own the data. The result is that other ONAP components can freely access that data without other components creating new APIs. Thus, components don't have to have own data rather the database serves as steward of the data. If the owner is the only persona that writes the data, there should be no race conditions of two entities trying to write or modify data.
- ACCESS CHARACTERISTICS - Historical data and current data do not necessarily share the same characteristics & requirements. There might be multiple data base technologies that underlie the operation of the service.
...
NAME | GERRIT ID | COMPANY | TIME ZONE | ||||||
Toine Siebelink | Toine Siebelink | Ericsson | toine.siebelink@est.tech | UTC+1 | Tony Finnerty | Ericsson | tony.finnerty@ericsson.comUTC+1 | ||
Theodore Johnson | theodore johnson | AT&T | johnsont@research.att.com | UTC-4 | |||||
Rishi Chail | Ericsson | rishi | .chail@est.techUTC+1 | ||||||
Niamh Core | Niamh Core | Ericsson | niamh.core@est.tech | UTC+1 | |||||
Aditya Puthuparambil | Bell Canada | aditya.puthuparambil@bell.ca.chail@est.tech | UTC+1 | ||||||
Bruno Sakoto | user-4e793 | Bell Canada | bruno.sakoto@bell.ca | UTC-5 |
Table of Contributors: (+1)
...
NAME | GERRIT ID | COMPANY | TIME ZONE | ||||||
Benjamin Cheung | Benjamin Cheung | Nokia | ben.cheung@nokia.com | UTC-4 | |||||
N. K. Shankar | N.K. Shankaranarayanan | AT&T | shankar@research.att.com | UTC-4 | |||||
Marcin Krasowski | Marcin Sebastian Krasowski | Samsung | m.krasowski@samsung.com | UTC+2 | |||||
Pawel Slowikowski | Samsung | p.slowikows2@samsung.com | UTC+2 | ||||||
Krystian Kedron | user-7f92d | Samsung | k.kedron@partner.samsung.com | UTC+2 | |||||
Carlos Manzanares | Carlos Manzanares | Nokia | Carlos.Manzanares@nokia.com | UTC+3 | |||||
Fred Feisullin | Fred Feisullin | Verizon Wireless | Fred.Feisullin@Verizon.com | UTC-4 | |||||
Sandeep Shah | Sandeep Shah | IBM | Sandeep.Shah@ibm.com | ||||||
Philippe Leger | Philippe Leger | Bell | Philippe.Leger1@bell.ca | UTC-4 | |||||
Sandeep.Shah@ibm.com | |||||||||
Philippe Leger | Philippe Leger | Bell Canada | Philippe.Leger1@bell.ca | UTC-4 | |||||
Joachim Blixt | Samsung | j.blixt@partner.samsung.com | UTC+2 | ||||||
Tony Finnerty | Ericsson | tony.finnerty@ericsson.com | UTC+1 | ||||||
Theodore Johnson | theodore johnson | AT&T | johnsont@research.att.com | UTC-4 | |||||
Niamh Core | Niamh Core | Ericsson | niamh.core@est.tech | UTC+1 | |||||
Aditya Puthuparambil | Bell Canada | aditya.puthuparambil@bell.ca | UTC+1 | Joachim Blixt | Samsung | j.blixt@partner.samsung.com | UTC+2 | ||
Claudio D. Gasparini | Pantheon.tech | claudio.gasparini@pantheon.tech | UTC+1 | ||||||
Ruslan Kashapov | Pantheon.tech | ruslan.kashapov@pantheon.tech | EET (UTC+2) | ||||||
Martin Vezeau | Martin Vezeau | Bell Canada | martin.vezeau@bell.ca | UTC-4 |
Other Contact People:
- Zu Qiang (Ericsson)
- David Kinsey
- KINGSLY LAWRENCE
- Swaminathan Seetharaman
- N.K. Shankaranarayanan
- Melanie Sater
- Anita Hai
- Marge Hillis
- Marc-Alexandre Choquette
- Michela Bevilacqua
- Mike Elliott
- Munir Ahmad
- Junfeng Wang
- user-4e793
- Fred Feisullin
- Claudio David Gasparini
...
Next Step | Description | Response |
---|---|---|
1 | 1A. Name of the project is appropriate (no trademark issues etc.); 1B. Proposed repository name is all lower-case without any special characters | Official Name of the project will be CONFIGURATION PERSISTENCE SERVICE Apache Geode is also using CPS, but it is not trademarked. Geode CPS |
2 | Project contact name, company and email are defined and documented | Toine Siebelink is the PTL and info can be found at 71834220 KEYPROJECTFACTS |
3 | Description of the project goal and its purpose are defined | The goal and purpose are on the project proposal: 71834220 PROJECTDESCRIPTION |
4 | Scope and project plan are well defined | The scope is defined in the project proposal: 71834220 SCOPE |
5 | Resources committed and available (company commitments, all people) | These can be found here: 71834220 RESOURCES Repo TBD |
6 | Contributors identified (people who add code) +2 | |
7 | Initial list of committer identified (elected/proposed by initial contributors) +1 | |
8 | Meets ONAP TSC Policies (NFR, GR, Code review, Testing, Audits, Documenting Interface) | The C&PS team intends to follow all ONAP TSC Policies. |
9 | Proposal has been socialized with potentially interested or affected projects (e.g. AAI, CDS, SO) and/or parties | TSC - TSC 2020-10-01 Requirement S/C - ONAP R8 Modeling High Level Requirements Architecture S/C - Modeling S/C - ONAP R7 Resource IM Call 2020-9-21 E2E Network Slicing (Requirements/Use Cases) SON PCI (Requirement/Use Cases) |
10 | Cross Project Dependencies (XPDs). In the case where a project will require changes in other projects, those projects are listed in the proposal, and a sponsoring developer in the project has been identified | There are no changes required upon other ONAP Platform component projects. |
11 | Tools have been identified and discussed with relevant partners (Linux Foundation, IT). Once the project pass the review:
| 1. Tool Chain: (action) 2. Tools: (action) 3. Code Review: using Gerrit for Code Review. 4. Testing: unit, integration test will be part of the developer work; ONAP goal for 55% testing code coverage. Will be using SonarQube. 5. Project Page: Configuration & Persistency Service R7 Developer page: Configuration & Persistency Service PoC |
...