...
Operation | Concurrent requests/parallel | DMI Delay | Response size | Performance Requirement (Blue Stone tablet KPI) | Notes | Sign-Off | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Registration of 20,000 CM-handles (in batches of 100) | 1 (requests are sequential) | 100 ms to get module references | N/A |
|
| |
2 | De-registration of 100 CM-handles | 1 (requests are sequential) | No Module delays | N/A |
| De-registration is currently not mentioned in Stone Tablet KPI or FS, however we have agreed to match the performance of registration for now as de-reg is also not a priority at this point in time | |
3 | CM-handle ID search with Module filter | 2.5 | N/A | 20,000 CM Handles i.e. 100*20.000 = 2MB | As provided byCsaba Kocsis 0.625 seconds/Operation | TDB||
4 | CM-handle search with Module filter | 2.5 Run in parallel with #3 | N/A | 20,000 CM Handles i.e. 500*20.000 = 10MB | As provided by Csaba Kocsis 13 seconds/Operation | TDB||
5 | Synchronous single CM-handle pass-through read | 10 | 300 ms Csaba Kocsis | 5 KB | 25 (parallel) request/sec | Read are done in parallel with Write | TDB|
6 | Synchronous single CM-handle pass-through write (CUD) | 10 | 670 msCsaba Kocsis | 5 KB | 13 (parallel) request/sec | No response is expected | TDB
Notes
- This is for mixed TCs
- Single KPIs will be monitored in NCMP owned pipeline with our performance every day(2 hrs interval) - Performance
- As confirmed, test was carried out on 2 instances in ETH env. CPS validated 2 replica instances have show considerably better test performance - CPS-2038
Synchronous single cm-handle pass-through (read) requests
...