Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Have dao methods for creating and retrieving row(s) from aforementioned table.



models-pap

/policy-models-pap/src/main/java/org/onap/policy/models/pap/concepts/PolicyAudit.java - concept

/policy-models-pap/src/main/java/org/onap/policy/models/pap/persistence/concepts/JpaPolicyAudit.java - persistence entity

/policy-models-pap/src/main/java/org/onap/policy/models/pap/persistence/provider/PolicyAuditProvider.java - dao actions


tests and a persistence.xml file would be added to src/test


policy-pap:

have the endpoints for deploy/undeploy updated with the call for storing the process for tracking.

...

  • there are two methods - trackDeploy and trackUndeploy - where the call for new method(s) would be added
  • have a map list of trackers audit (similar to create/update groups)
  • the new method(s) would create a track object and add to a trackMap an auditList for when the updateDb method is called

have a new endpoint to get the audit on policy (need to confirm which fields would be used for filter - assuming pdp group or policy name/version, and begin/end times)


Questions:


  • How many records could this return? may want to force a limit on the record count and maximum time window. may want to require starting timestamp
    • limit set on API: 10
    • limit set on models provider: 50 (there's a validation to check if number is over models limit) - should we keep this and this range (10-50)
  • Does the table need to be cleaned up at times?
    • Jira
      serverONAP Jira
      serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
      keyPOLICY-3328
  • what sort of filters should be allowed? 
    • none
    • pdpGroup
    • policy (name and version)
    • group and policy (name and version)
  • Should still use timestamp on filter?
  • Should we filter by actions? (i.e. want to see only deployments)
  • Failure (result of a DEPLOY) is to be tracked as well?