...
# | Assumption | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | "fields" and "scope" are propriotary proprietary options or not in the scope of this anylysisanalysis. | |
| 2 |
Issues & Decisions
# | Issue | Notes | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Which operation(s) need support for multiple cm handles? |
if many what is the priority? | |
| 12 | Do we need to use same xpath (resourceIdentifierInQuery) for all cm handles or different for each cm handle ? | ||
| 23 | Which datasources ? | Do we need to support passthrough-only no-cached() data only ? or, alternatively, support operational/running (cached) data too ? | |
| 4 | Endpoint url patterns? | Existing : /v1/ch/{cm-handle}/data/ds/{datastore-name} CPS Propossed : /v1/batch/data/ds/{datastore-name} ( include cm handles into payload / body and leave datastore into url) | |
| keep datastore, topic and optional parameters in the URL itself instead into body. | CPS prefers keep interface similaralsimilar as single cm handle interface (consistency and cost) Existing : ...&topic=topicParamInQuery | ||
| 3 | Impacts on DMI Plugin Interfaces
| ||
| 4 | How we are supporting multiple anchors into CPS-Core ?
| ||
| 5 | Response always Async ie. topic is compulsory ?
|
...