Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

#

Issue

Notes 

Decision

1Which operation(s) need support for multiple cm handles?
  1. Get
  2. Create
  3. Update (Put)
  4. Patch
  5. Delete

if many what is the priority?

agreed with kieran mccarthy 

Only Get (read)

(in future other operations might be support batch option too)

2

Which datasources should be supported?

Do we need to support passthrough-only no-cached() data only ?
(maybe just start with that, support cached data bulk request later)

agreed with kieran mccarthy :

all passthrough datastores will be supported

Not implemented (yet) response, for non passthrough datastores 

3URL  pattern for NCMP bulk endpoints

Existing : /v1/ch/{cm-handle}/data/ds/{datastore-name}

CPS Proposed : /v1/batch/data/ds/{datastore-name}

      ( include cm handles into payload / body and leave datastore into url)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meeting : kafka message schema & batch interface extension

POST http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/batch/data&topic=my-topic-name

{
              operations: [
                             {
                                           operation: read,
                                           datastore: "...",
                                           options: "...",
                                           resourceIdentifier: "...",
                                           cmhandleIds: [4, 6]
                             },
                             {
                                           operation: read,
                                           datastore: "...",
                                           options: "...",
                                           resourceIdentifier: "...",
                                           cmhandleIds: [1, 2, 3]
                             }
              ]
}

 

POST http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/data&topic=my-topic-name

agreed with kieran mccarthy : Follow the existing interfaces as much as possible for consistency and efficiency

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

kieran mccarthy 


We had an internal review with some of our rApp colleagues around some of the recent proposed NCMP batch interface and they came back with some valid comment. 


The proposal is that we should not distinguish batch from bulk or other flavours of read/write. 

The aim is to only have a single flavour of interface for read or write for clients.  Therefore the proposal is to drop “batch” from the interface URL and just act toward “data”  (reads/writes/actions)


4keep datastore, topic and optional parameters in the URL itself instead into body.

CPS prefers keep interface similar as single cm handle interface (consistency and cost)

Existing : ...&topic=topicParamInQuery

agreed with kieran mccarthy : Follow the existing interfaces as much as possible for consistency and efficiency

5

support in ONAP DMI-plugin


agreed with Toine Siebelink : ONAP plugin can respond with not implemented yet code,

6

Response always Async ie. topic is compulsory ?

Assume topic is compulsory (defined in OPenApi) → Response therefore wil be 400 if not supplied

Agreed with kieran mccarthy :

Topic is optional but system will respond with 'Not implemented (yet when not specified or blank

7Should NCMP Amalgamate Async responses from DMI-Plugin before forwarding ?step 6 in flow diagram

Agreed with kieran mccarthy : NCMP wil only forward to client topic no handling tracking or any responses or status of request

8Handle non responding dmi-plugin

Agreed with kieran mccarthy :
No response for 4b then send an error response to the topic given by client

9Should (can) NCMP check if 'MyTopic' specified by client existConsider Access Control too. For now NCMP can log error. Client is responsible for topic setup

Agreed with kieran mccarthy :
NCMP can log error when forward to 'client topic' Security not in scope (yet)

10How to handle non-existing CM-Handles (id)

Suggestions

  1. Silently ignore
  2. (initial) error response
    1. should we combine all errors in one message?

Agreed with kieran mccarthy :

Additional error (messages) response with all cm-handles that cannot be resolved, also a separate error message wil be sent for each failed DMI

11

Overlap/clash with Deutsche Telekom user story:

Jira
serverONAP Jira
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
keyCPS-1377
?!


discussed in weekly ONAP meeting the DT user story is affect CPS-Core interface (not NCMP) and the requirement is to execute a query over ALL cm-handles (cached  only?!) instead of a given list of cm-handles (~anchors)

12

Schema of bulk response


Jira
serverONAP Jira
columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
keyCPS-1556

1) Agreement required on the structure of the response.  Please see response structure below.
2) Does 'eventTime' field which holds the timestamp of the bulk response event,  required or can it be dropped?


Code Block
titleBatch Event Headers Schema
collapsetrue
{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema",
  "$id": "urn:cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async:batch-event-headers:1.0.0",
  "$ref": "#/definitions/BatchEventHeaders",
  "definitions": {
    "BatchEventHeaders": {
      "description": "The header information of the Batch event.",
      "type": "object",
      "javaType" : "org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async.v1.BatchEventHeaders",
      "properties": {
        "eventId": {
          "description": "The unique id for identifying the event.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "eventCorrelationId": {
          "description": "The request id received by NCMP as an acknowledgement.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "eventTime": {
          "description": "The time of the event. It should be in RFC format ('yyyy-MM-		     dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSZ').",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "eventTarget": {
          "description": "The destination topic to forward the consumed event.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "eventSource": {
          "description": "The source of the event.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "eventType": {
          "description": "The type of the Batch event.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "eventSchema": {
          "description": "The schema of the Batch event payload.",
          "type": "string"
        },
        "eventSchemaVersion": {
          "description": "The schema version of the Batch event payload.",
          "type": "string"
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "eventId",
        "eventCorrelationId",
        "eventTarget",
        "eventType",
        "eventSchema",
        "eventSchemaVersion"
      ],
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
  }
}


Code Block
titleSample Batch Event Headers
collapsetrue
{
  "eventId":            "4cb32729-85e3-44d1-aa6e-c923b9b059a5",
  "eventCorrelationId": "68f15800-8ed4-4bae-9e53-27a9e03e1911",
  "eventTime":          "2023-03-28T14:29:23.876+0000",
  "eventTarget":        "client-topic"
  "eventSource":        "dmi-plugin:enm-1"(dmi service name)
  "eventType":          "org.onap.cps.ncmp.event.model.BulkResponseEvent",
  "eventSchema":        "urn:cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async:batch-event-schema:1.0.0",
  "schemaVersion":      "1.0.0",

}


Code Block
titleBatch Event Payload Schema
collapsetrue
{
  "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/schema",
  "$id": "urn:cps:org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async:batch-event-schema:1.0.0",
  "$ref": "#/definitions/BatchDataResponseEvent",
  "definitions": {
    "BatchDataResponseEvent": {
      "description": "The payload of batch event.",
      "type": "object",
      "javaType" : "org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.async.v1.BatchEvent",
      "properties": {
        "event": {
          "description": "The content of Batch event.",
          "type": "object",
          "existingJavaType": "java.lang.Object",
          "additionalProperties": false
        }
      },
      "required": [
        "event"
      ],
      "additionalProperties": false
    }
  }
}  


Code Block
titleSample Batch Event Payload
collapsetrue
{     
  "event": {
     "payload": "response of batch cm handles"
  } 
}


Need to follow schema structure there in  #15 under Issues & Decisions section and it  is  agreed on    

13

Schema for Bulk Response event forwarding to client specified  topic

CPS-1557 - NCMP : forward bulk response messages to client topic

Not keeping the 'eventTarget' which comes from the (BulkResponseEvent(In progress of the structure agreement)).

Note:  Will consider  'eventTarget', If it finalized the schema from

Jira
serverONAP Jira
columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
keyCPS-1556




Agreed on to keep one schema for both events (DMI → NCMP) and (NCMP → ClientApps)

14

How NCMP would forward response? (Response data : ref.  message flow #6)

Jira
serverONAP Jira
columnIdsissuekey,summary,issuetype,created,updated,duedate,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb
keyCPS-1556

    1. Do we need to send only one response containing all the requested cm handles ?
    2. Send single response for each cm handle?
    3. Single response message per DMI plugin?

kieran mccarthy - Please share your inputs on the above listed questions.


15Message format for the batch interfacesome non-styandard headers wil need to be implemented as 'extensions' and names to be confirmed
  • correlationid
  • target

 kieran mccarthy 

We have had some internal discussions including with some O-RAN standards representatives and one of the outcomes is that it would be good if we aligned with the some community standards for event header definitions.  IT is proposed (initially from AT&T) that we should follow Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) specification as defined in their cloudevents incubator project.
More details see CPS Events Structure#CNCFCloudEventalignment        

16NCMP wil send only one request to each DMI


Code Block
languagebash
titleNCMP batch endpoint
collapsetrue
curl --location 'http: //localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/data?topic=my-topic-name' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--header 'Authorization: Basic Y3BzdXNlcjpjcHNyMGNrcyE=' \
--data '{
    "operations": [
        {
            "operation": "read",
            "operationId": "12",
            "datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational",
            "options": "(fields=schemas/schema)",
            "resourceIdentifier": "parent/child",
            "targetIds": [
                "836bb62201f34a7aa056a47bd95a81ed",
                "202acb75b4a54e43bb1ff8c0c17a8e08"
            ]
        },
        {
            "operation": "read",
            "operationId": "14",
            "datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-running",
            "targetIds": [
                "ec2e9495679a43c58659c07d87025e72",
                "0df4d39af6514d99b816758148389cfd"
            ]
        }
    ]
}'


Code Block
languagebash
titleNCMP batch endpoint response (200->OK)
collapsetrue
{
    "requestId": "4753fc1f-7de2-449a-b306-a6204b5370b3"
}


Code Block
languagebash
titleDMI service batch endpoint
collapsetrue
DMI Service 1 (POST): http://172.26.202.25:8783/dmi/v1/data?topic=my-topic-name&requestId=4753fc1f-7de2-449a-b306-a6204b5370b3 -> 

[
    {
        "operationType": "read",
        "operationId": "14",
        "datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-running",
        "cmHandles": [
            {
                "id": "ec2e9495679a43c58659c07d87025e72",
                "cmHandleProperties": {
                    "neType": "RadioNode"
                }
            },
            {
                "id": "0df4d39af6514d99b816758148389cfd",
                "cmHandleProperties": {
                    "neType": "RadioNode"
                }
            }
        ]
    }
]

DMI Service 2 (POST) : http://172.26.202.26:8783/dmi/v1/data?topic=my-topic-name&requestId=4753fc1f-7de2-449a-b306-a6204b5370b3 -> 

   [
    {
        "operationType": "read",
        "operationId": "12",
        "datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational",
        "options": "(fields=schemas/schema)",
        "resourceIdentifier": "parent/child",
        "cmHandles": [
            {
                "id": "836bb62201f34a7aa056a47bd95a81ed",
                "cmHandleProperties": {
                    "neType": "RadioNode"
                }
            },
            {
                "id": "202acb75b4a54e43bb1ff8c0c17a8e08",
                "cmHandleProperties": {
                    "neType": "RadioNode"
                }
            }
        ]
    }
]


Agreed with Csaba Kocsis  and kieran mccarthy

requestId would be send as a path param from NCMP to DMI-plugin.


Example 

NCMP batch endpoint : http://localhost:8080/ncmp/v1/data?&topic=my-topic-name

DMI-Plugin batch endpoint : http://172.26.202.25:8783/dmi/v1/data?topic=my-topic-name&requestId=e6fa4d26-4dc1-4877-aa3c-45e99f840708


  • Mandatory Fileds :
      • "operation": "read"
      • "operationId": "12"
        "datastore": "ncmp-datastore:passthrough-operational"
      • "targetIds": [ "0df4d39af6514d99b816758148389cfd", "ec2e9495679a43c58659c07d87025e72" ]


  • Optional Fields : 
      • "options": "(fields=schemas/schema)"
      • "resourceIdentifier": "parent/child"




17Feature Name (events, URL)

event type proposal : from BatchDataXXXEvent  to

DataOperationXXXEvent

For example : DataOperationResponseEvent 

 'eventType' value as below 'org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.BatchDataXXXEvent

proposed Operation like :

'org.onap.cps.ncmp.events.DataOperationXXXEvent

'batch' was the keyword use in the URL for this feature (now gone) but much code classes etc uses this name still...


...

Field 

Type

Description

Mandatory?

Notes

id
stringThe unique id identifying the event

Mandatory

Generated by DMI-Plugin
correlationid
stringThe request id passed by NCMP

Mandatory

It's requestId that NCMP sent to client as an ACK.

Example : “request-1234" (UUID)

time
stringThe timestamp when original event occurred

Optional

The timestamp should follow that on https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339#section-5.
This follows ISO 8601 and is what is used/referenced in 3GPP standards

Example: 1985-04-12T23:20:50.52Z

   This represents 20 minutes and 50.52 seconds after the 23rd hour of

   April 12th, 1985 in UTC.

target (TBC)
stringThe destination topic of the client

Mandatory

Example : my-topic
source
stringThe source of the event

Optional

Example : dmi-plugin:enm-1 (dmi service name)
type
stringThe type of the event

Mandatory

NCMP owns eventType that would be used by dmi-plugins 

convention of eventType and Schema names is under discussion, see open issue #17

datacontenttype
stringThe schema and version of the Batch event payload.

Mandatory

NCMP owns eventSchema that would be used by dmi-plugins
convention of eventType and Schema names is under discussion, see open issue #17

schemaVersionstringThe schema version of the Batch event payload.Mandatory

Now included Included in datacontenttype

specversion  (default String
Mandatoryhardcoded value of 1.0)String


Event Body (data)

  • The current proposal is to use the CNFC Event structure and library as detail in CPS Events Structure#CNCFCloudEventalignment
  • To prevent problems with large data request a single response event will be sent for a successful read for each cm handle (id)
  • Error message can contain information about multiple cm handle ids

...