Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Updated Meeting notes for 13 June 2018

...

  • Record the Meeting!! (issue with Zoom recording)
  • Introductions
  • Additional Casablanca Proposals
    • Elizabeth Hoch
      • Service Request Status API
      • Service Request Profile API (may be part of TMF 641)
      • Performance Management API
      • Service Grouping on Service Order and Service Inventory APIs
      • Service Catalog Update Notifications
    • Adrian OSullivan
      • Relationship of External APIs with MEF and TM Forum
      • Service Modification
      • CC VPN Use Case may help with requirements for Interlude
      • Need support from other component teams to build needed functionality within ONAP
      • Service Catalog: Notifications, and API schema for Service Characteristics (based on OpenAPI)
      • Service Ordering and Activation: Service Modification, Full E2E activation (SO Impacts
      • Service Inventory: Service State; Traversal (Depth and Expand)
      • Potential integration with MSB
      • Interlude Enhancements
    • Manoj Nair
      • Hybrid Service Management
      • Edge automation Use Cases
      • Relationship with ETSI MEC Architecture
      • Mobile Edge Application Orchestrator and NFVO
      • Use of Legato and Interlude
      • External API is not addressing Presto, but we should identify which other projects are relevant here with the Architecture Sub-committee Explore TAPI 2.0 for Southbound
      • Explore TMF 640 and ETSI OS-MA
      • Need to capture E2E service capabilities
      • Explore Federated Network Slicing
      • ExtAPI to have it's own catalog and inventory for E2E (for coordination of multiple ONAP instances)

Last time:

  • Continue Proposal for Casablanca Manoj Nair
    • Presented proposal for Casablanca for hybrid service orchestration
      • Support for TMF 640 (or TMF 641); and  TAPI 2.0 and SOL002 for Customer Configuration to Partner Domains (Interlude)
      • Discussion: 
        • Could TMF 641 be used instead of TMF 640
        • Interactions with Partner Domain (Interlude) should be at Service Level not the Resource Level
        • Need to define flows based CCVPN use case to define function interactions and Service Level information
        • Relationship to ONAP Service Information Modeling effort
  • Interlude discussion Mehmet Toy
  • Next Time:
    • Additional Casablanca Proposals
    • Proposal for Casablanca Manoj Nair
    • Interlude discussion Mehmet 

...

  • Next call will take place on 30  May 2018 
  • Architectural considerations for External APIs (mapping to ONAP components)
  • User Stories / Use Cases; State Models; Sequence diagrams for External and Internal interactions with ONAP components
  • Continue review and refinement of ONAP Common Model UML (Service Abstraction focus)
  • Discussion on coordination with Architecture, Modeling, and MSB efforts (Alexander Vul)20 June 2018

Action items

  •