...
| M1 Version: v71 | AREA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Design / Run-Time | (min: Level 2 for closed-loop project; 0 for others) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 for runtime, level 1 others) | (min: Project Level 2, 70% at silver) | (min: level 1 for runtime projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | (min: level 2 all projects) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min TSC Recommendations | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | M1 Actual | M1 Target | M4 result | ||||||
| Project Name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A&AI | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 (Stretch goal) | 1 | 1 | 1+ (see note #10) | 1+ (see note #10) | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Application Authorization Framework | R | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| APPC | R | 0 | 1 or 2 (Stretch Target) | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 (Stretch goal) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 (Stretch goal) | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| CLAMP | D | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Common Controller SDK | R | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| DCAE | D & R | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 (Stretch goal) Note#2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 (STRETCH GOAL) | ||||||||||||
| DMaaP | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | WIP Note #9 | 2 (Stretch goal) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Documentation | NA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| External API Framework | R | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Holmes | R | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | NA | NA | NA | |||||||||||||||||||
| Logging Enhancements Project | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 (M4 stretch 1) | 1 | 1 | 1 (see note #8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| POMBA (under but separate pod from Logging) | R | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Microservices Bus | R | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Modeling | D/R | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Multi VIM/Cloud | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| MUSIC | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| ONAP CLI | D & R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| ONAP Operations Manager | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| ONAP Optimization Framework | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| ONAP Usecase UI Project Proposal | D | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+ | 1 | 1+ | ||||||||||||
| Policy Framework Project Proposal | D & R | D: 1 R: 1+ | D: 1 R: 2 | 2 | 2 | D: 1 R: 1+ | D: 2 R: 2 | 1 | 1 See Note #4 | 1 | 1 See Note #4 | 11 | 2 (Stretch goal) | 1 | See Note #4 1 | 1 | See Note #6 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Portal Platform Project Proposal | D & R | 1 | 1 See Note #11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| SDN-C | R | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Service Design & Creation | D | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1+AAF | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Service Orchestrator | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 (Stretch goal) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| VFC | R | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| VID | R | 0 | 0 | 2 (Note #1) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (Note #8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| VNF SDK | D | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| VNF Requirements | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |||||||||||||||||||
| VNF Validation (VVP) | D | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |||||||||||||||||||
...
Note 3: SO for security improvement based on the resource availability
Note 4: The policy project added a new application component to support SDC Service Distribution for the HPA Use Case. However, promised resources did not fulfill any of the S3P work for this runtime component.
Note 5: Only the drools PDP had a performance plan improvement. We ran out of time to build a performance plan for XACML PDP. (NOTE: No requirements for brand new Apex PDP, that is targeted for 'E' release).
Note 6: The resources for doing logging v1.2 went away as part of the contract/restructuring between the two corporations early 2018.
Note 8: logging spec and implementation changes done with AT&T/TechMahindra to sync to Acumos - logging resources are absolute minimal during casablanca - 1.2 spec completion is pushed to Dublin
...