You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Current »

Date

at 10:00AM EDT

Meeting Link: https://zoom.us/j/957965398

Discussed

  • Recording: zoom_0.mp4
    • Chat Log: none
  • Project Update - El Alto ExtAPI status
  • Discussion CFS Mapping to RFS resolver René ROBERT versus SDC ServiceProxy. Potential collaboration also with Third Party Operation Domain Manager from Atif Husain. Presentation material from Atif is available here:  https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/60890278/ONAP%20usecase%20-%20Third%20Party%20ODM_v18.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1566954017000&api=v2
  • MEF Update Karthik Sethuraman . Karthik, did not get a chance to present but he gave quick update in chat, hope to allow Karthik time on next meeting to give update. 

    "here is my update: 3 items of note related to MEF Legato Service API: IPS (Interface Profile Specification) - the information model part - CfC#1 deadline end of next week , Interface Implementation Specification IIS (Interface Implementation Specification) - - the API part - work started on the generic APIs as well as SD-WAN - generic APIs are based on ONAP External API as starting point. 

    3rd item - MEF LSO committee is discussing the best ways to document the API and the contents of such documentation, which tools to use for such developing, reviewing and delivering such documentation"

Frankfurt Release Requirements gathering page created, please add your requirements here Frankfurt Release API Requirements Gathering Page


Next week:

  • MEF Update Karthik Sethuraman
  • Continue to discuss potential use of CDS by NBI (TMF 640)and support for macro mode Service Orders (TMF 641) Yuriy Malakov
  • Continue Discuss CFS Mapping to RFS resolver René ROBERT
  • Discuss El Alto Jira progress/issues Matthieu Geerebaert
  • Third Party Domain Manger Interactions Nishi Mathur
  • Service Qualification API Flows Mohammad Nurujjaman
  • Examine TM Forum specs such as TMF 641 v18.5 (e.g., added service type) Should we group services to service type?

Last week:

  • No labels