The content of this template is expected to be fill out for M1 Release Planning Milestone.
Use the "Copy" and "Move" options (available under the ..., top right of this page) to duplicate this template into your project wiki. |
Project Name | Enter the name of the project |
---|---|
Target Release Name | Frankfurt |
Project Lifecycle State | Incubation |
Participating Company | China Mobile, Huawei |
The Usecase-UI Frankfurt release has following primary objectives:
1. Supporting use cases identified by ONAP and integration:
Multi-domain Optical Network Services
E2E Network Slicing Use Case
2. UUI enhancement and new features:
JDK upgrade evaluate and migrate (Depend on the commit resource)
3. Document current upgrade component strategy(TSC must have)
4. SECCOM Perform Software Composition Analysis - Vulnerability tables(TSC must have) - plan to solve the most of the security issues, but also depends on the commit resource
5. SECCOM Password removal from OOM HELM charts(TSC must have)
6. SECCOM HTTPS communication vs. HTTP(TSC must have) - Based on the resource contribution
Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer requirements).
Multi-domain Optical Network Services
E2E Network Slicing
Usecase-UI will include the necessary subcomponents supporting the primary objectives: meeting platform maturity goals and supporting the use cases.
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.
Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.
Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note, etc) of this release.
Deliverable Name | Deliverable Description |
---|---|
Source Code | Source code for all UUI components |
Maven Artifacts | Maven Artifacts for all UUI components |
Docker Containers | Docker container associated with UUI components |
Documentation | UUI detailed documentation |
List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.
Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.
At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.
Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.
Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.
Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.
Please fill out the centralized wiki page: Frankfurt Release Platform Maturity
List the API this project is expecting from other projects.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.
Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.
API Name | API Description | API Definition Date | API Delivery date | API Definition link (i.e.swagger) |
Portal Platform API | API for integration of portal applications | |||
Catalog API (SDC) | API to read the NS and VNF Catalog | |||
SO API(Modeling) | API for NS instantiation and termination | |||
MSB API | API for registration and use of micro-services bus | |||
A&AI API | API for gettring inventory and image management | |||
VF-C API | API for NS instantiation and termination | |||
DataLake API | API for FCAPS (VNF/VM monitoring) | |||
External API | API for external data |
None
None.
Provide a description of the testing activities (unit test, functional test, automation,...) that will be performed by the team within the scope of this release.
Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.
This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.
Gaps identified | Impact |
---|---|
Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.
List the risks identified for this release along with the plan to prevent the risk to occur (mitigation) and the plan of action in the case the risk would materialized (contingency).
Risk identified | Mitigation Plan | Contingency Plan |
---|---|---|
To fill out | To fill out | To fill out |
Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.
The milestones are defined at the Release Level and all the supporting project agreed to comply with these dates.
This section is optional and may be used to document internal milestones within a project team or multiple project teams. For instance, in the case the team has made agreement with other team to deliver some artifacts on a certain date that are not in the release milestone, it is erecommended to provide these agreements and dates in this section.
It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.
Date | Project | Deliverable |
---|---|---|
The Documentation project will provide the Documentation Tool Chain to edit, configure, store and publish all Documentation asset. |
If this project is coming from an existing proprietary codebase, ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed. All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols.
FOSS activities are critical to the delivery of the whole ONAP initiative. The information may not be fully available at Release Planning, however to avoid late refactoring, it is critical to accomplish this task as early as possible.
List all third party Free and Open Source Software used within the release and provide License type (BSD, MIT, Apache, GNU GPL,... ).
In the case non Apache License are found inform immediately the TSC and the Release Manager and document your reasoning on why you believe we can use a non Apache version 2 license.
Each project must edit its project table available at Project FOSS.
Charter Compliance
The project team comply with the ONAP Charter.