Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Recommendation based on the Use Case

Based on the above findings, the ArchNav platform has by to a large extent solved the highlighted shared problem on the problem statement. The goal for any softare software program is to eliminate complexity and not introduce one. Architecture Navigator on one side which is, offering an intuative intuitive graphical navigation, and quick access to the documentation, has consistently produced stellar performance. Conversely, the platform  platform which is a stand-alone application fails in the providing an integration structure for providing a single entry point for the ONAP documentation. Additionally, a pain point to be of concern would be the complexity that might arise in implementing a clickable image features. 

That said, to eliminate any confusion that could arise when ONAP community members try to access the official documentation, ArchNav as a parallel option would not be the ideal solution. However,