Key Points
- There are many different types of logging formats that have been proposed and informally adopted across ONAP
- 2017 OpenECOMP Logging Specifications; ONAP Logging Specifications v1,1, v1,2 and v1.3.
- Many different types of logging libraries EELF, PyLog, Log4J, logback, FLog, dropwizard-logging, log4js, logkit, clojure logging, jboss-logging, UnderscoreLog. Probably others. (See Nexus Report Here).
- It is not the place of SECCOM to define a logging format for ONAP Projects to follow.
- We should stay focused on proposing Security focused logging requirements and recommend to TSC to adopt as a Best Practice and subsequently adopting as a Global Requirement.
- When proposing requirements we should not be dictating implementation details BUT we should be cognizant of existing implementations and how our proposed requirements will impact those existing implementations.
- We should strive to reduce impact on existing implementations as much as possible.
Security Log Structure
Timestamp | Log Type | Log Level | Transaction ID | Status Code | Severity | Container Data | Protocol | Service / Program Name | Log Message | |||||
Image Tag / Name | Image Digest | ID | Name | Principal ID | Role / Attribute ID | |||||||||
...