Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Table of Contents
maxLevel2

todo

Architecture

Description

description

Observation

Responsibilities and delivery process unclear. Stakeholders and tasks are not covered by the release process. Updates for the architecture description must be manually inquired from the Architecture Subcommittee and LFN Marketing and hence are provided late in the release process.

Relevant articles to be checked and updated arefiles:

Suggestion for Improvement

  •  todo

Marketing/Composite

Release Note

release note

Observation

Responsibilities and delivery process unclear. Stakeholders and tasks are not covered by the release process.

Who is in the lead to use the content provided in the 'Release Key Updates' to create the Marketing/Composite Release Note?

Content in 'Release Key Updates' (e.g. for the 'istanbul' release) is partly not provided by the projects/subcommittees. Partly is must be rephrased to be used in the Marketing/Composite Release Note.

x

Suggestion for Improvement

  •  todo

Branching of repositories

Observation

x

See Increased transparency on software modules included in an ONAP release

Suggestion for Improvement

Management of ONAP projects/software modules participating in a release

Observation

See Increased transparency on software modules included in an ONAP release

Suggestion for Improvement

  •  
Process to create documentation not clear

Process description

for 'doc' project team to create ONAP documentation

Observation

For the 'doc' project team there is no clear set of instructions to create the release specific documentation for an ONAP release.

Suggestion for Improvement

Process

to create documentation not clear

description for ONAP project teams to create project documentation

Observation

For the ONAP project teams there is no clear set of instructions to create the release specific project documentation for an ONAP release.

Suggestion for Improvement

...