Versions Compared

Old Version 247

changes.mady.by.user Kenny Paul

Saved on

compared with

New Version 248

changes.mady.by.user Kenny Paul

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Agenda set Sept. 18

...

TOPIC RECOMMENDATIONS


Anchor
TH3
TH3


Amsterdam M4 Code Freeze Milestone Review  

...

  • Description: M4 Code Freeze Review of all Amsterdam Projects. TSC will vote on the projects and depending on the findings, TSC will need to decide on:

...

Anchor
M6
M6


Training: On the Importance of adopting Scrum and Estimating 

...

  • Description: Discussion on the benefits of applying Scrum techniques and Poker Planning for Estimating.
    1. Why is Scrum important for the Team. How to apply Scrum for distributed Team
    2. You can't swallow more that you can shew: Estimating with Poker Planning will make the team more realistic.

...

  • Description: Description of the topic and the objective/outcome desired at the end of the discussion.
  • Topic Leader: The person that is knowledgeable enough to lead and moderate this discussion.
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration:
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Anchor
TH11
TH11


External Open Source collaboration (OPNFV, ODL, etc.) and required actions  

...

Anchor
TH6
TH6


External Standards Coordination and required actions with a different SDO   

...

Anchor
W3
W3


Joint Architecture/Usecase subcommittees' meeting 

...

Anchor
W4
W4


Joint Architecture/Usecase/Modeling subcommittees' meeting 

...

Anchor
TH10
TH10


ONAP security subcommittees' meeting   

...

  • Description: A discussion and feedback on ONAP security topics:  Static Code Scanning; CII Badiging program certification feedback (CLAMP team); Credential Management
  • Topic Leader: Stephen Terrill; (together with a CLAMP team memember)
  • Volunteer Note Taker: Pawel Pawlak pawel.pawlak3@orange.com 
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hour
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Anchor
W5
W5


R2 (Beijing) Architecture 

...

...

Anchor
W7
W7


R2 (Beijing) use cases/platform capabilities first presentation to the TSC 

...

...

Anchor
TH15
TH15


Usecase subcommittee meeting  

...

Anchor
M8
M8


Kubernetes ONAP deployment overview and hands-on  

...

...



Anchor
TH2
TH2


Modeling 

Anchor
T2
T2


Residential vCPE Use-Case deep dive 

...

Anchor
T3
T3


VoLTE Use-Case deep dive 

...

...


...

Anchor
M2
M2


Microservice Bus Tutorial 

Anchor
M3
M3


Introducing CLI Model engine &  Tutorial 

...

  • Description: As part of this session, audience will learn about the CLI model engine capabilities and how to develop ONAP commands using it just by writing YAML file with zero line of code, CLI model engine produce Commands directly from YAML.
  • Topic Leader: user-67d6f
  • Volunteer Note Taker: user-67d6f
  • Estimated Duration: 1h 
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

...

Anchor
T1
T1


Integration / Testing 

  • Description: This session will give an overview of ONAP status from Integrtaion / Testing point of view:
    1. ntegration testing process and its status:
      1. UT
      2. CSIT
      3. Integration lab, this includes pair testing rules for each project, this includes a brief on how to use the lab in general, Stephen and Yang will give details later
      4. End to End lab status overview for vCPE, VoLTE  (deep dive will be covered in another two sessions) and vFW / vDNS
      5. Integration deployment strategy for Amsterdam: assets requirement and deployment topology, quick review of how to use heat template to deploy ONAP in Integration lab
    2. Integration testing practice and results from Orange open lab

Anchor
M4
M4


How to use ONAP Community Lab 

...

Anchor
W2
W2


R2: Non-functional requirements proposals  

...

...

Anchor
M1
M1


ONAP Development Tutorial 

...

Anchor
T8
T8


Control Loop - E2E 

Anchor
M5
M5


LF Productivity and Process Town Hall Session  

...

  • Description:  Everyone has their favorite tool they want to use to work and communicate more efficiently.   The LF IT Department gets requests to add new tools or functiuonaluty on an almost daily basis, but accomodating all of these isn't feasable.  We need a more complete strategy for supporting your needs and this Monday session is intended to gather community input and share ideas on what is working well and can be improved upon in the area of tools and processes.  NOTE: This is not a technical "how-to" session.
  • Topic Leader:Kenny Paul  Tech. Program Manager, The Linux Foundation
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last email
  • Estimated Duration: 1hr
  • Interested to attend:

Anchor
M7
M7


Documentation: how to describe detailed call flows 

...

  • Description: To undestrand the various ONAP component inteactio, call flows description are very impôrtant. They are currenly used in various projects  and use-cases. Various tools are used to describe call flows with various levels of details. This session will present a way to describe some detailed call flows with API calls between various components using PlantUML.
  • Date: TBD
  • Topic Leader: Eric Debeau - Orange
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 30'
  • Interested to attend:

Anchor
TH12
TH12


Future Plan for the Development of Holmes 

...

  • Description:  The basic analysis capability of Holmes will be available by R1. We want to discuss how to enhance the functionalities to make Holmes be able to support more use cases and scenarios. Besides, we want to have a brief introduction on the vision of a smarter and more general analysis application based on the big data components provided by the ONAP community. 
  • Topic Leader: Guangrong Fu
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last email
  • Estimated Duration: 1hr
  • Interested to attend:

...

  • Description:  David Shadmi from SDC team gave a small group people a demo of VoLTE E2E service design by using early version of SDC, it was very helpful. We would like to see the same demo with the latest SDC code and bigger audience to get the feedback.  
  • Topic Leader: David Shadmi
  • Volunteer Note Taker: Yang Xu
  • Estimated Duration: 1hr
  • Interested to attend:

Anchor
TH1
TH1


End-to-End Model Driven VNF Lifecycle Management/Modeling 

...

  • Description: As part of the VNF SDK project, VNF modeling subproject has been focusing on establishing a consistent end-to-end approach for VNF and VNF package modeling in R2. We have identified several starting point for standardization of these models. What we need to do next is to agree on what models and/or standards are going to be applicable at what stages of the VNF lifecycle.

    We will start with the VNF model, as it is seen by VNF developers, inclusive of compute/storage/network hardware requirements, telemetry and policy specification, and identified how this information is ingested and trasformed into other models as part as part of VNF on-boarding (SDC), instantiation (SO/VF-C/Optimization/Policy) and operation (APPC/VFC/Optimization/Policy).

    We will also need to understand how policies and telemetry apply across the VNF management lifecycle, at what point they are defined, who gets to define them and how they are blended/federated with policies already provided during VNF on-boarding.

Anchor
T9
T9


Enhancing ONAP to orchestrate container VNFs using container orchestration as VIMs 

...

  • Description: Release 1 ONAP instantiates VNFs as VMs in compute farm using VIMs such as Openstack which manages VM. Increasing VNF density on each node, need for multiple networks/slices, Services using SFC and reduced bringup & network latency requirements in market such as 5G and vCPE  are driving container based VNFs.  This project proposal is to enhance ONAP to support VNFs as containers in addition to VNFs as VMs by container orchestration as VIM instead of VM manager like openstack.

...

...

Anchor
TH9
TH9


DCAE New Features and Enhancements for Beijing and Future Releases 

...

...

Anchor
TH13
TH13


SDC: R2 Backlog Discussion 

...

...

Anchor
TH8
TH8


VID: R2 Backlog Discussion  

...

  • Description: Presenting and further gathering of R2 candidate requirements
  • Topic Leader: David Shadmi 
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

Anchor
TH14
TH14


AAI: Graph DB Evolution 

...

...

  • Description: Discuss Beijing plans to move to JanusGraph, migration strategies, etc.
  • Topic Leader: Jimmy Forsyth
  • Volunteer Note Taker: 
  • Estimated Duration: 1 hours
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:
         

Anchor
TH7
TH7


Service Orchestration Workflow Development and Testing  

...

...

Anchor
T10
T10


TOSCA Native Service Orchestration Design 

...

Anchor
TH5
TH5


ONAP Modeling: long-term strategy vs short-term tactics  

...

...


  • Description: Discuss goals, challenges and approaches to define an ONAP modeling long-term strategy (R2 and beyond), with the emphasis on E2E service automation, in sync with long-term architecture and driven by ONAP Service Provider requirements, and the short-term tactics (R2) in support of the long-term strategy; consider requirements, architecture, info models, data models, and DSLs in this order, and discuss the landscape of standards and open source communities contributing to them. Make specific long-term strategic, as well as specific short-term tactical recommendations for ONAP and other SDOs/open source communities.
  • Topic Leader: Michael Brenner, Cloudify, michael@cloudify.co
  • Volunteer Note Taker: First Last  email
  • Estimated Duration: 1.5 hrs
  • Link to data Source (if applicable)
  • Interested to attend:

...

Anchor
T4
T4


Subtopic 1:   Multi-Cloud Architectural Vision Introduction 

...

...

Description:   This session will focus on discussion of the evolution of the Multi-Cloud framework for R2 and beyond, to address some of the platform gaps and move towards a more extensible and consistent cloud mediation layer. We would like to introduce a few key focus areas for this evolution, both in term of the use cases, architectural design principles, and integrations.

...

Presenters:                       AT&T, VMware, Wind River, Intel

Anchor
T5
T5

Subtopic 2: Performance & Isolation - "Towards a performance-aware and portable cloud-agnostic Infrastructure"  AnchorT5T5

Description:                    Multi-vendor cloud portability and interoperability while delivering performance is a mandatory feature of distributed DC deployments. The practical challenge in achieving this goal is the lack of standardization of Platform-aware and QoS features, for example extra specs in OpenStack, which results in a vertically integrated solution. This session will focus on how Multi Cloud can offer policy standardization and translation as a microservice for platform-aware and QoS features (hard-guarantee, min-guarantee, best effort etc.) for addressing this challenge and how NFV application classes such as IMS/EPC Control/Data Plane can benefit from this framework.

...

Presenters:                      Wind River, Intel

Anchor
T6
T6

Subtopic 3:  SDN - "Architectural options for Multi-vendor SDN Controller and Multi Cloud Deployments in a DC"  AnchorT6T6

Description:                    Multi-vendor components in a DC including underlay, overlay, gateway and SDN Controllers for the same pose various architectural challenges in terms interoperability, security etc. This session will focus on an in depth analysis of the architectural options including related efforts such as OpenStack Gluon. This proposal also addresses communication latency-bound multi-side physical DCs which can be treated as a single virtual DC for management purposes.

...

Presenters:                     AT&T, Intel, Huawei, VMware

Anchor
T7
T7


Subtopic 4:   FCAPS Telemetry - "Standardized Infrastructure Class statistics Model" 

...

...

Description:                   This session will focus on a hierarchical cloud-platform-aware architectural framework with separation of collection, storage, processing functions and real-time vs historical analytics components. In this framework, Multi Cloud will deliver a standardized infrastructure class statistics model for driving ONAP component/VNF placement/change management across distributed DC multi cloud instances through ONAP-OF, DCAE and other components. The benefit to ONAP platform, across all use cases, will be delivering the best performance and security while minimizing cost.

...

Presenters:                       VMware, Wind River, AT&T, Intel


Anchor
TH4
TH4

Kubernetes vs Dockers Swarm supporting ONAP-OOM on multi-cloud multi-stack environment  AnchorTH4TH4

Description:  ONAP was set originally to support multiple container platform and cloud through TOSCA. In R1 ONAP and OOM is dependent completely on Kubernetes. As there are other container platforms such as Docker Swarm that are gaining more wider adoption as a simple alternative to Kubernetes. In addition operator may need the flexibility to choose their own container platform and be open for future platform. We need to weight the alternatives and avoid using package managers as Helm that makes K8s mandatory.

...

Description:  The purpose of this topic is to share preliminary Amsterdam Release Lesson Learned, to reflect together on how everything went and then to decide what changes we want to make in the next ONAP release (i.e. Beijing), answering the following questions:

...