Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Updated M1 for ExtAPI


It is envisioned that from a Service Provider to Partner Provider interaction context (i.e. MEF Interlude), the ONAP External API will support the following types of interacts:
•Service Provider controls aspects of the Service within the Partner domain (on behalf of the Customer) by requesting changes to dynamic parameters as permitted by service policies.
•Service Provider queries state of the Service.
•Service Provider requests change to administrative state or permitted attributes of a Service.
•Service Provider request creation of connectivity between two Service Interfaces as permitted by established business arrangement.
•Service Provider request instantiation of functional service components as permitted by established business arrangement.
•Service Provider queries the Partner for detailed information related to Services provided by the Partner to the Service Provider.
•Service Provider receives Service specific event notifications (e.g., Service Problem Alerts) from the Partner.
•Service Provider receives Service specific performance information from the Partner.
•Service Provider request Service related test initiation and receive test results from the Partner.

DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR COMMENTS

...

Project NameVNFRQTS
Target Release NameBeijing, Casablanca, Dublin
Project Lifecycle StateIncubation; Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company AT&T, CenturyLink, China Mobile, China Telecom, Orange, PCCW Global, Verizon, Amdocs, Ciena, Huawei, Intel, Netcracker, ZTE, MEF

...

Provide a clear and unambiguous ONAP service abstraction so that the BSS/OSS can exchange service requirements and service capabilities in a common and consistent fashion.
Provide a way to rapidly integrate new Services and Service Components into ONAP so that they can quickly introduce capabilities for their customers and within their infrastructure.
Enable management the entire lifecycle of Services within ONAP in a common way so that they can ensure orchestration, manageability and control of each Service in an easily integrateable and low cost way.
Model Driven approach: a cohesive way to have a shared view of information across ONAP external interfaces that can be used for or be input into a model driven process whereby the cost of delivering platform functionality is drastically reduced and the time to delivery is dramatically decreased.

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

It is envisioned that from a Service Provider to BSS/OSS interaction context (i.e. MEF Legato), the ONAP External API will support the following types of interacts:

  • BSS/OSS retrieves Service Models
  • BSS/OSS requests service feasibility determination.
  • BSS/OSS requests reservations of capabilities related to a potential Service.
  • BSS/OSS requests activation of Service.
  • BSS/OSS receives Service activation tracking status updates.
  • BSS/OSS retrieves Service Inventory
  • BSS/OSS receives usage events due to a Customer initiating dynamic activity on their Service (e.g., increase in bandwidth).
  • BSS/OSS receives a summary of Service quality and usage information.
  • BSS/OSS receives Service state and fault event information
  • BSS/OSS receives Service Activation Testing results.
  • BSS/OSS receive capability information about the Service layer.
  • BSS/OSS manages Licenses
  • BSS/OSS receives License Usage information

It is envisioned that from a Service Provider to Partner Provider interaction context (i.e. MEF Interlude), the ONAP External API will support the following types of interacts:

  • Service Provider controls aspects of the Service within the Partner domain (on behalf of the Customer) by requesting changes to dynamic parameters as permitted by service policies.
  • Service Provider queries state of the Service.
  • Service Provider requests change to administrative state or permitted attributes of a Service.
  • Service Provider request creation of connectivity between two Service Interfaces as permitted by established business arrangement.
  • Service Provider request instantiation of functional service components as permitted by established business arrangement.
  • Service Provider queries the Partner for detailed information related to Services provided by the Partner to the Service Provider.
  • Service Provider receives Service specific event notifications (e.g., Service Problem Alerts) from the Partner.
  • Service Provider receives Service specific performance information from the Partner.
  • Service Provider request Service related test initiation and receive test results from the Partner.

Image Added

Release Deliverables

To fill out
Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
DocumentationDocumentation of User Stories; Use Cases and Interactions (e.g., UML); Information Models (e.g., UML); Data Models (e.g., JSON); Interface Profiles and Functional Definition;ONAP Component Mapping and Functional Analysis
External APIJSON Swagger / OpenAPI for the External Interface
External API Agent SoftwareCode contribution for External API Agent functionality
Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
To fill out

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-component must be in sync with the overall release.

Sub-components are repositories are consolidate in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

  1. External API Agent
  2. Service Catalog API
  3. Service Ordering API
  4. Service Inventory API

ONAP Dependencies

List the other ONAP projects your depends on.

Dependent on APIs from SDC, SO, and AAI

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

...

Anyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.

API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this release is expecting from other releases.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

...

Image Added

Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

Area

Actual Level

Targeted Level for current Release

How, Evidences

Comments

Performance00
  • 0 -- none
  • 1 – baseline performance criteria identified and measured
  • 2 & 3 – performance improvement plans created & implemented
Stability00
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – 72 hours component level soak w/random transactions
  • 2 – 72 hours platform level soak w/random transactions
  • 3 – 6 months track record of reduced defect rate
Resiliency00
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – manual failure and recovery (< 30 minutes)
  • 2 – automated detection and recovery (single site)
  • 3 – automated detection and recovery (geo redundancy)
Security01
  • 0 – none
  • 1 – CII Passing badge + 50% Test Coverage
  • 2 – CII Silver badge; internal communication encrypted; role-based access control and authorization for all calls
  • 3 – CII Gold
Scalability00
  • 0 – no ability to scale
  • 1 – single site horizontal scaling
  • 2 – geographic scaling
  • 3 – scaling across multiple ONAP instances
Manageability00
  • 1 – single logging system across components; instantiation in < 1 hour
  • 2 – ability to upgrade a single component; tracing across components; externalized configuration management
Usability00
  • 1 – user guide; deployment documentation; API documentation
  • 2 – UI consistency; usability testing; tutorial documentation

API Incoming Dependencies

List the API this release is expecting from other releases.
Prior to Release Planning review, Team Leads must agreed on the date by which the API will be fully defined. The API Delivery date must not be later than the release API Freeze date.

Prior to the delivery date, it is a good practice to organize an API review with the API consumers.

API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)
SDC: Catalog APIExposes Service CatalogTBDTBDhttps://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/SDC+API
SO: Service Instantiation APIRequests for Service InstantiationTBDTBD
AAI: Service Inventory APIQuery for Service InventoryTBDTBD

API Outgoing Dependencies

API this release is delivering to other releases.

Link toward the detailed API description
API NameAPI DescriptionAPI Definition DateAPI Delivery dateAPI Definition link (i.e.swagger)To fill outHigh level description of the APIDate for which the API is reviewed and agreedTo fill out
ExtAPI: Service CatalogExternal Service Catalog APITBDTBDTBD
ExtAPI: Service OrderingExternal Service Ordering APITBDTBDTBD
ExtAPI: Service InventoryExternal Service Inventory APITBDTBDTBD

Third Party Products Dependencies

Third Party Products mean products that are mandatory to provide services for your components. Development of new functionality in third party product may or not be expected.
List the Third Party Products (OpenStack, ODL, RabbitMQ, ElasticSearch,Crystal Reports, ...).

NameDescriptionVersion
TBDTBDTBDTo fill outTo fill outTo fill out

In case there are specific dependencies  (Centos 7 vs Ubuntu 16. Etc.) list them as well.

...

Describe the plan to integrate and test the release deliverables within the overall ONAP system.
Confirm that resources have been allocated to perform such activities.

Potential Test Cases for External API include:

  • BSS/OSS retrieves Service Models
  • BSS/OSS requests activation of Service.
  • BSS/OSS receives Service activation tracking status updates.
  • BSS/OSS retrieves Service Inventory


Gaps

This section is used to document a limitation on a functionality or platform support. We are currently aware of this limitation and it will be delivered in a future Release.
List identified release gaps (if any), and its impact.

Gaps identifiedImpact
TBDTBDTo fill outTo fill out

Known Defects and Issues

Provide a link toward the list of all known project bugs.

...

Risk identifiedMitigation PlanContingency Plan
TBDTBDTBDTo fill outTo fill outTo fill out

Resources

Fill out the Resources Committed to the Release centralized page.

...

It is not expected to have a detailed project plan.

DateProjectDeliverable
TBDTBDTBDTo fill outTo fill outTo fill out

Documentation, Training

  • Highlight the team contributions to the specific document related to he project (Config guide, installation guide...).
  • Highlight the team contributions to the overall Release Documentation and training asset
  • High level list of documentation, training and tutorials necessary to understand the release capabilities, configuration and operation.
  • Documentation includes items such as:
    • Installation instructions
    • Configuration instructions
    • Developer guide
    • End User guide
    • Admin guide
    • ...

...