Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents
outlinetrue

Overview

Project NameEnter the name of the projectMUSIC
Target Release NameEnter the name of the release you are targeting to deliverBeijing
Project Lifecycle StateEither Incubation, Core, Mature. Refer to ONAP Charter, section 3.3 Project Lifecycle for further information
Participating Company List the company participating in this release. At least 3-4 organizations, including an operator are recommended.AT&T, Intel, Netcracker, Verizon, Windriver (in lexical order)

Scope

What is this release trying to address?

Describe the problem being solved by this release

Use Cases

Describe the use case this release is targeted for (better if reference to customer use case).

Minimum Viable Product

Describe the MVP for this release.

Functionalities

This release of MUSIC provides a shared service with recipes that individual ONAP components and micro-service can use for state replication, consistency management and state ownership across geo-distributed sites. This is a crucial component enabling ONAP components to achieve geo-redundancy (platform-maturity resiliency level 3). 

Use Cases

  • Targeted goal for R2: OOF-Homing Optimizer (HAS) uses MUSIC for its state persistence (as a queue) and as a highly available distributed messaging service. 
  • Stretch goal for R2: ONAP Portal will use MUSIC to store its http session state across sites in a persistent manner.  

Minimum Viable Product

MUSIC service that can serve the geo-redundancy needs of ONAP HAS and ONAP Portal while satisfying the platform maturity requirements for the Beijing release. 

Functionalities

Since we currently do not have the LF tool chain, we are just attaching the excel containing the epics and user stories. 


View file
nameMUSIC_functionality.xlsx
height250
List the functionalities that this release is committing to deliver by providing a link to JIRA Epics and Stories. In the JIRA Priority field, specify the priority (either High, Medium, Low). The priority will be used in case de-scoping is required. Don't assign High priority to all functionalities.

Epics

Jira
serverONAP JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
maximumIssues20
jqlQueryproject=sanbox and issuetype in (epic)
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb

...

Jira
serverONAP JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,created,updated,due,assignee,reporter,priority,status,resolution
maximumIssues20
jqlQueryproject=sanbox and issuetype in (story)
serverId425b2b0a-557c-3c0c-b515-579789cceedb

Longer term roadmap

Indicate at a high level the longer term roadmap. This is to put things into the big perspective.In the long term we hope that MUSIC will be state-management system for all ONAP components and micro-services to manage geo-redundancy. For example, we envisage the use of MUSIC for multi-site state management in SO (to store Camunda state across sites), <SDN-C, AppC> (to store ODL related state across sites) , A&AI (to store its graph data) and most other ONAP components that need to manage state across sites. Further, we envision that these services will use the MUSIC recipes  (mdbc, prom, musicCAS, musicQ) to achieve the goal of a multi-site active-active federated ONAP solution. 

Release Deliverables

Indicate the outcome (Executable, Source Code, Library, API description, Tool, Documentation, Release Note...) of this release.

Deliverable NameDeliverable Description
To fill outTo fill out

Sub-Components

List all sub-components part of this release.
Activities related to sub-components must be in sync with the overall release.

Cource code and REST API

The entire source code for the MUSIC service and

the corresponding REST API to access it.

Compilation scripts

Script to generate the MUSIC war file that

can be deployed in the Apache Tomcat webserver

Installation guide

Document that describes how MUSIC can be installed

in containers

Tool description

Complete description of the inner workings of MUSIC and

how it performs state management

Basic BenchmarksBasic performance benchmarks for the MUSIC operations
API documentationREST API documentation in Swagger
Test CasesJunit test cases covering sufficient parts of MUSIC code

Sub-Components

NA. Sub-components are repositories and are consolidated in a single centralized place. Edit the Release Components name for your project in the centralized page.

Architecture

High level architecture diagram

At that stage within the Release, the team is expected to provide more Architecture details describing how the functional modules are interacting.

Indicate where your project fit within the ONAP Archiecture diagram.

Block and sequence diagrams showing relation within the project as well as relation with external components are expected.


Image Added



MUSIC will be available as a common service like DMaap or AAF as shown in the red, oblong box below:


Image AddedAnyone reading this section should have a good understanding of all the interacting modules.


Platform Maturity

Refering to CII Badging Security Program and Platform Maturity Requirements, fill out the table below by indicating the actual level , the targeted level for the current release and the evidences on how you plan to achieve the targeted level.

...