Practice Area | Checkpoint | Yes/No | Evidence - Comment | How to? | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product Management | Are all provisional APIs interface (stub) been defined (at beta-quality level)? | Yes | Our code already has support for swagger. We are working with Gildas to figure out how to expose this. | ||
Is there a final list of externally consumable APIs available? | Yes | Our code already has support for swagger. We are working with Gildas to figure out how to expose this. | |||
For all completed Sprints, have Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | In progressYes | ||||
Are all tasks associated with the completed Sprint Backlog Stories been marked as "Done" in Jira? | In progressYes | https://jira.onap.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=113&view=detail&selectedIssue=MUSIC-9&quickFilter=273 | |||
If applicable to your project, has your team been able to clear the project' blockers? If not provide status on the plan to close the blocker(s). | Yes | ||||
What new features or changes to existing features in this project scope need to be communicated to VNF Providers? List the changes in the Evidence tab. | NA | ||||
If yes to the previous question, have these been communicated to the VNF Requirements project? | NA | ||||
Release Management | Have all source code files been updated with License Apache 2 header? | In progress | Yes | Had the initial approval from Steve Winslow and followed all his suggestions. However, the CLM job is still pending: https://jenkins.onap.org/view/music/job/music-maven-clm-master/. Working with Linux foundation fix this.Sent mail to onap helpdesk asking them to trigger license test job | Specific rules and instruction are available in ONAP wiki. |
Has the year format in copyright header of all source code files been updated? (Rules for new files created in 2018 and existing files modified in 2018 are different) | In progress | Sent mail to onap helpdesk asking them to trigger license test jobNA | Guidance on year format | ||
In case source code can't be edited, has a "License.txt" file been placed at the root directory for which the license is applicable? | In progress | Sent mail to onap helpdesk asking them to trigger license test job | NA | Guidance for source code file that can't be edited | |
(a) Has the Project Team added appropriate license and copyright notices to all ONAP source code and documentation files, where possible for the particular file format? | In progress | Yes | Had the initial approval from Steve Winslow and followed all his suggestions. However, the CLM job is still pending: https://jenkins.onap.org/view/music/job/music-maven-clm-master/. Working with Linux foundation fix this. Sent mail to onap helpdesk asking them to trigger license test job | ||
(b) Has the Project Team reviewed and understood the most recent license scan reports from the LF, for both (a) licenses within the codebase and (b) licenses for third-party build time dependencies? | In progress | Yes | Had the initial approval from Steve Winslow and followed all his suggestions. However, the CLM job is still pending: https://jenkins.onap.org/view/music/job/music-maven-clm-master/. Working with Linux foundation fix this. Sent mail to onap helpdesk asking them to trigger license test job | ||
For both (a) and (b) questions, have all high priority non-Project Licenses been either removed, planned for removal before code freeze, or escalated as likely exception requests? | In progress | Yes | Had the initial approval from Steve Winslow and followed all his suggestions. However, the CLM job is still pending: https://jenkins.onap.org/view/music/job/music-maven-clm-master/. Working with Linux foundation fix this. Sent mail to onap helpdesk asking them to trigger license test job | ||
Have all API projects dependencies been captured? NA | Yes | Working on getting a swagger.json into the code. However, we do have a pdf version of the API: https://github.com/att/music/blob/master/RestMusicOverview.pdf | |||
Development | For new projects approved for this release, have all defined repositories source code been placed into Gerrit? | Yes | For evidences, provide link(s) to Gerrit repos by providing the URL as shown in this example | ||
Has the project team reach the Automated Unit Test Code Coverage expectation? (Refer to artifacts available in Sonar) | In progress | We now are showing up in SONAR but there are still errors that need to be resolved: https://jenkins.onap.org/view/01-all-sonar/job/music-sonar/ Working with LF for to resolve Sonar integration is done, but working with Linux foundation to automatethis. | |||
Is there any binaries (jar, war, tar, gz, gzip, zip files) in Gerrit project repository? | No | Refer to CI Development Best Practices | |||
Could you ensure that all proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, company name, etc. have been removed? All ONAP deliverables must comply with this rule and be agnostic of any proprietary symbols. | Yes | ||||
Is there any pending commit request older than 36 business hours in Gerrit? | No | ||||
Have all the Jenkins jobs successfully passed (Merge-Jobs)?Provide link as evidence to Jenkins project tab | Yes | https://jenkins.onap.org/view/music/job/music-master-merge-java/ | |||
Are all snapshot binaries available in Nexus?Provide link to evidence in Nexus project folder | Yes | https://nexus.onap.org/#nexus-search;quick~music | |||
Integration and Testing | Have functional test cases been documented in wiki? | Yes | https://wiki.onap.org/download/attachments/22250137/ONAP-Music-Functional-Test-Cases-ed.01.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1518121792784&api=v2 | ||
Have you implemented in Jenkins at least 1 functional test case for each of the project repository? | Yes | Working with Linux foundation to get the automatcion working.In progress | As an example (provided by Integration Team) | ||
Has the project code successfully passed the Build process? | In progress | Yes | Working with Linux foundation to get the automatcion working. https://jenkins.onap.org/view/music/job/music-master-verify-java/ | Goal is to ensure your project latest commits have not broken the build. | |
Documentation | Has the team identified and outlined the set of documentations to be delivered in this Release? | Yes |